Skip to main content

Occupational licensing and minorities

Abstract

The costs of occupational licensing fall disproportionately on minorities and the poor. Licensing seeks to eliminate the lower-quality, lower-price services that low-income consumers would be more likely to select. Perhaps more important, however, is the impact on workers who are denied entry into the occupation. Recent evidence confirms that licensing regulations esclude less-educated and minority workers more than proportionally. The consequences for these excluded workers include unemployment or lower earnings—either by moving to a less-favored occupation or practicing without a license. The outcomes ofnonprofessional trades regulated by licensing are similar to those predicted by segmented labor market theory. Those who fail to obtain the credential (license) are denied access to the trade even if they are no less productive.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Agency charges bias in state licensing tests.Los Angeles Times, June 5, 1981.

  • Allison, E. K. Sex-linked earnings differentials in the beauty industry.Journal of Human Resources, 1976,11, 383–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benham, L., & Benham, A. Regulating through the professions.Journal of Law and Economics, 1975,18, 421–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, G. The challenge of segemented labor market theoris to orthodox theory: A survey.Journal of Economic Literature, 1976,14(2), 1215–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, S.The occupational licensing queue: Theory and evidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University (St. Louis), 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, S. the occupational licensing queue.Journal of Human Resources, 1980,15(3), 424–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B. The effect of occupational licensure on black occupational attainment. In S. Rottenberg (Ed.),Occupational licensure and regulation. Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.Capitalism and freedom Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalachek, E., & Raines, F. The structure of wage differences among mature male workers.Journal of Human Resources, 1976,11(4), 484–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. E. Quacks, lemons, and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards.Journal of Political Economy, 1979,87(6), 1328–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellow, W. S. Employer size and wages.Review of economics and statistics, 198264(3), 495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revised agent-broker exams still geared to middle-class whites.Illinois Underwriter, 1978, April, 1.

  • Rottenberg, S. The economics of occupational licensing. InAspects oflabor economics, Princeton, New Jersey: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. Licensing restrictions and the cost of dental care.Journal of Law and Economics, 1978,21, 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimberg, B., Esser, B. F., & Kruger, D. H.Occupational licensing: Practices and policies. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. The theory of economic regulation.Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 19711, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was completed before the author joined the Committee and does not represent an official position of the Committee.

About this article

Cite this article

Dorsey, S. Occupational licensing and minorities. Law Hum Behav 7, 171–181 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044521

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044521

Keywords

  • Labor Market
  • Social Psychology
  • Lower Earning
  • Market Theory
  • License Regulation