Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing females acquitted by reason of insanity, convicted, and civilly committed in Florida 1977–1984

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Females who had been acquitted by reason of insanity (N=41), convicted of comparable offenses (N=41), and involuntarily hospitalized without criminal involvement (N=41) were matched for age and race. The psychiatric histories of the acquitted and civilly committed women were similar, and significantly more extensive than the convicted group. The acquitted women had been arrested significantly more often than the civilly committed women but less frequently than the convicted women. Total length of stay (hospitalization or imprisonment) reflected a similar pattern, with civilly commited women hospitalized for the shortest period, acauitted women an intermediate period, and convicted women the longest. Regression-based prediction of length of stay reflected a number of common predictors for the acquitted and convicted women, with offense type one of the most powerful for both groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreasen, N. (1983). The clinical differentiation of affective and schizophrenic disorders. In Zales, M. (Ed.),Affective and schizophrenic disorders: New approaches to diagnosis and treatment. New York: Prunner/Mazel, pp. 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arens, R. (1967). The Durham rule in action: Judicial psychiatry and psychiatric justice.Law and Society Review, 1, 41–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, N., & Hotz, A. (1984). The behavior of mentally disordered criminals in civil mental hospitals.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 35, 585–589.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boehnert, C. (1985). Psychological and demographic factors associated with individuals using the insanity defense.Journal of Psychiatry and Law, Spring/Summer, 9–31.

  • Cooke, G., & Sikorski, C. (1974). Factors affecting length of hospitalization of persons adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 2, 251–261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Criss, M., & Racine, D. (1980). Impact of change in legal standards for those adjudicated not guitly by reason of insanity.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 8, 261–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-III), 3rd ed. (1980). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Endicott, J., & Spitzer, R. (1978). A diagnostic interview: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia.Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 837–844.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukunaga, K. (1977).The criminally insane in Hawaii. Honolulu: State of Hawaii Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, C. (1979). Crime and the insanity defense, an international comparison: Ontario and New York state.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 7, 125–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, M., & Pasewark, R. (1983). Characteristics of persons utilizing the insanity plea.Psychological Reports, 53, 191–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herjanic, M., Henn, F., & Vanderpearl, R. (1977). Forensic psychiatry: Female offenders.American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 556–558.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones v. United States, 103 S.C. 3043 (1983).

  • Kahn, M., and Raifman, L. (1981). Hospitalization versus imprisonment and the insanity plea.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 483–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, A. (1970).Mental disabiliry and the law: A field study. Chicago: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megargee, E. (1982). Psychological determinants and correlates of criminal violence. In Wolfgang, M., and Weiner, N. (Eds.),Criminal violence. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 81–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, W., and Petersen, D. (1966). Follow-up on discharged offenders-“Not guilty by reason of insanity” and “criminal sexual psychopaths”.Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 57, 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. (1978). Crazy behavior, morals, and science: An analysis of mental health law.Southern California Law Review, 51, 527–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantle, M., Pasewark, R., & Steadman, H. (1980). Comparing institutionalization periods and subsequent arrests of insanity acquittees and convicted felons.Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 8, 305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasewark, R. (1986). A review of research on the insanity defense.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 484, 100–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pasewark, R., & Lanthorn, B. (1977). Dispositions of persons utilizing the insanity plea in a rural state.Journal of Humanics, 5, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasewark, R., Pantle, M., & Steadman, H. (1979a). characteristics and disposition of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity in New York State, 1971–1976.American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 655–660.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pasewark, R., Pantle, M., & Steadman, H. (1979b). The insanity plea in New York state. 1965–76.New York State Bar Journal, 52, 186–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasewark, R., Pantle, M., & Steadman, H. (1982). Detention and rearrest rates of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity and convicted felons.American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 892–897.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrila, J. (1982). The insanity defense and other mental health dispositions in Missouri.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 81–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B., & Pasewark, R. (1980). Insanity plea in Connecticut.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 8, 335–344.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, H., & Lipinski, J. (1978). Diagnosis in schizophrenia and manic-depressive illness.Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 811–828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, R., & Pasewark, R. (1983). Characteristics, dispositions, and subsequent arrests of defendants pleading insanity in a rural state.Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 11, 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., Golding, S., & Finchman, F. (1987). Implicit theories of criminal responsibility: Decision making and the insanity defense.Law and Human Behavior. 11, 207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J., & Bloom, J. (1982). Characteristics of persons committed to Oregon's Psychiatric Security Review Board.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 10, 155–164.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. (1978). Insanity acquittal in the seventies: Observations and empirical analysis of one jurisdiction.Mental Disability Law Reporter, 1, 406–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1978). U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1979). U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1980). U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1981). U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1982). U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1983). U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1984). U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1985). U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Spitzer, R., & Williams, J. (1985).Structured clinical interview for DSM-III. New York State Psychiatric Institute: Biometrics Research Department.

  • Spitzer, R., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. (1978). Research diagnostic criteria: Rationale and reliability.Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 773–782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spodak, M., Silver, S., & Wright, C. (1984). Criminality of discharged insanity acquittees: Fifteen year experience in Maryland reviewed.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 12, 373–382.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H. (1980). Insanity acquittals in New York State, 1965–1978.American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H., & Braff, J. (1983). Defendants not guilty by reason of insanity. In Monahan, J., and Steadman, H. (Eds.),Mentally disordered offenders: Perspectives from law and social science. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H., Keitner, L., Braff, J., & Arvanites, T. (1983). Factors associated with a successful insanity plea.American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 401–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H., Pasewark, R., Hawkins, M., Kaiser, M., & Bieber, S. (1983). Hospitalization length of insanity acquittees.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 611–614.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Heilbrun, K., Heilbrun, P.G. & Griffin, N. Comparing females acquitted by reason of insanity, convicted, and civilly committed in Florida 1977–1984. Law Hum Behav 12, 295–311 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044386

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044386

Keywords

Navigation