Opinion polls in Canada, the United States, Great Britain, Australia, and elsewhere suggest that most members of the public would like their criminal courts to be harsher. Does media coverage of criminal sentencing contribute to a preference for harsher sentencing? Most people derive their information about sentencing from the news media and content analyses of news stories in Canada and the United States demonstrate that crimes of violence and sentences of imprisonment are overrepresented. Moreover, the news media provide little systematic information about the sentencing process or its underlying principles. This article reports the results of three studies examining the effects of media coverage on public opinion about sentencing. Subjects who read actual newspaper stories about sentencing that appeared in Canadian newspapers rated most reported sentences as too lenient. However, the specific account they read influenced their leniency judgments. Furthermore, in one experiment, participants assigned to read a newspaper account of a sentencing decision supported harsher sentences than participants who read a summary of actual court documents from the sentencing hearing.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Broadhurst, R., & Indermaur, D. (1982). Crime seriousness ratings: The relationship of information accuracy and general attitudes in Western Australia.Australia and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 15, 219–234.
Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987).Sentencing, reform: A Canadian approach. Ottawa: Canadian Government Publishing Centre.
Canadian Sentencing Commission (1988).Sentencing in the media: A content analysis of English-language newspapers in Canada. Research reports of the Canadian Sentencing Commission. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada.
Department of Justice, Canada (1983).Sentencing practices and trends in Canada: A summary of statistical information. Ottawa: Department Justice, Canada.
Diamond, S. S. (1989) Using psychology to control law: From deceptive advertising to criminal sentencing.Law and Human Behavior, 13, 239–252.
Doob, A. N. (1985).The many realities of crime. In A. N. Doob & E. L. Greenspan (Eds).,Perspectives in criminal law. Aurora, Ontario: Canada Law Book.
Doob, A. N., & Roberts, J. V. (1982).Crime: Some views of the Canadian public. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada.
Doob, A. N., & Roberts, J. V. (1983).An analysis of the public's view of sentencing. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada.
Doob, A. N., & Roberts, J. V. (1984). Social psychology, social attitudes, and attitudes toward sentencing.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 16, 269–280.
Doob, A. N., & Roberts, J. V. (1988). Public punitiveness and public knowledge of the facts: Some Canadian surveys. In N. Walker and M. Hough (Eds.),Public attitudes to sentencing: Surveys from five countries. Aldershot, England: Gower.
Dussuyer, I. (1979).Crime news: A study of 40 Ontario newspapers. Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.
Flanagan, T. J., McGarrell, E. F., & Brown, E. J. (1985). Public perceptions of the criminal courts: The role of demographic and related attitudinal variables.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 66–82.
Gordon, J. T., & Heath, L. (1981). The news business, crime and fear. In D. A. Lewis (Ed.),Reactions to crime. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Graber, D. A. (1980)Crime news and the public. New York: Praeger.
Hamill, R., Wilson, T. D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1980). Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 578–589.
Hough, M., & Moxon, D. (1985). Dealing with offenders: Public opinion and the views of victims—Findings from the British crime survey.Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 160–175.
Indermaur, D. (1987). Public perception of sentencing in Perth, Western Australia.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 20, 163–183.
Law Reform Commission-Australia (1988).Sentencing (Report No. 44). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990).Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford.
Roberts, J. V., & Doob, A. N. (1989). Sentencing and public opinion: Taking false shadows for true substances.Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 27, 491–515.
Roberts, J. V., & Edwards, D. (1989). Contextual effects in judgements of crimes, criminals and the purposes of sentencing.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 902–917.
Roberts, J. V., & White, N. R. (1986). Public estimates of recidivism rates: Consequences of a criminal stereotype.Canadian Journal of Criminology, 28, 229–241.
Standing Committee on Justice and Solicitor General (1988).Taking responsibility: Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Solicitor General on its review of sentencing, conditional release and related aspects of corrections. Ottawa: House of Commons.
Surette, R. (1984).Justice and the media. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
Verdun-Jones, S., & Mitchell-Banks, T. (1988).The fine as a sentencing option in Canada. Research Reports of The Canadian Sentencing Commission. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada.
Walker, N., & Hough, M. (1988).Public attitudes to sentencing: Surveys from five countries. Cambridge Studies in Criminology, LIX. Aldershot, England: Gower.
United Kingdom (1990).Crime, justice and protecting the public: The government's proposal for legislation. London: HMSO.
U.S. Sentencing Commission (1987).Manual: Sentencing guidelines Washington, DC: U.S. Sentencing Commission.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Valerie Hans and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper. The research reported in this article was carried out under contract with the Department of Justice, Canada, in some instances, and as part of the research program of the Canadian Sentencing Commission in others. Some of this research is derived from material contained in Doob and Roberts, 1982, 1983, 1984, and 1988, and the Report of the Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987). The writing of this article was supported by the Contributions Programme of the Solicitor General, Canada, to the Canadian criminology centers—specifically the Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto and the Department of Criminology, University of Ottawa. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of any government department or commission. We wish to thank Patricia Parker for running Study 2, and Brian Greenspan for providing the materials for Study 3. We would also like to thank the administration of the Ontario Science Centre for generously giving us access to facilities and visitors. Copies of the research materials used in, any of the studies described here are available from the authors.
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, J.V., Doob, A.N. News media influences on public views of sentencing. Law Hum Behav 14, 451–468 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044222
- Systematic Information
- Media Coverage
- News Medium
- News Story
- Underlying Principle