This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Guizot, F.:Essai sur l'histoire de France (preface).
Kohn, H.:The Mind of Modern Russia, p. VII (cf. Bibliography II). All works mentioned in the text which appear in ‘Selected Writings on Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century Russian Thought’ on pp. 114ff. of this issue will be referred to in the references by the number (Roman numeral) of the Section in which they appear.
Berdjaev, N. [1E] (Bibl. II), p. 7.
Stephen F. Cohen, inThe Russian Review 23 (1964) 4, 390–391.
Ibid., p. 390 and p. 391 respectively.
Martin E. Malia, inThe Russian Review 17 (1958) 2, 146.
Shapiro, David:A Select Bibliography of Works in English on Russian History, 1801–1917 (abbreviated: WERH; Bibl. I), p. V.
Ibid., Ch. 14, p. 68, A. note. The distinction drawn between “revolutionary movements” and “social thought” is, as Shapiro himself admits, an awkward one — leading, say, to the arbitrary classification of Bakunin as a “revolutionary” and Herzen as a “social thinker” (p. XI). Shapiro groups “social thought” with “philosophy” (Ch. 17), while Chapter 14 (Revolutionary Movements) covers more specifically political thought.
Malia, Martin E.,op. cit., p. 146 (where he cites Lampert, E. [1] (q.v. Bibl. III) as “a highly refreshing exception”).
Horecky, Paul L. (ed.) [1]:Basic Russian Publications (abbreviated: BRP; Bibl. I), p. V.
WERH, Ch. 17, p. 79, A. note.
Zen'kovskij ([2E], I/p. 14; [2R], p. 26) criticises Masaryk for not always being objective in his exposition, but finds his work “very useful” nevertheless (“vsë. že očen' polezna”).
The Spirit of Russia, Vol. I, p. VII (Translators' Foreword).
By V. A. Riasanovsky, writing inThe Russian Review 14 (1955) 1, 60.
Cf. BRP 359 note.
Cf.The Russian Review 23 (1964) 2, 191.
Cf.The Russian Review 23 (1964) 2, 191. The Russian version, surprisingly, is not listed in BRP (The English version appeared too late for inclusion in WERH).
Cf. WERH 870 note.
Koyré, Alexandre:La philosophie et le problème national en Russie au début du XIXe siècle. Paris, Honoré Champion, 1929 (Bibliothèque de l'Institut de Léningrad, tome 10).
Cf.Russia and the West in the Teaching of the Slavophiles, p. 223.
Nicolas Berdyaev:Dream and Reality. An Essay in Autobiography. Preface, pp. XIII–XIV.
Both authors have more recently written companion studies dealing with the later part of the century. These are Hare, R.:Portraits of Russian Personalities Between Reform and Revolution, London, Oxford University Press, 1959, and Lampert, E.:Sons Against Fathers. Studies in Russian Radicalism and Revolution, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1965. The latter is reviewed on page 101–103 of this issue. Both works will be examined in more detail at a later stage.
Hare, R.:Pioneers of Russian Social Thought, p. V.
Malia, Martin E.: inThe Russian Review 17 (1958) 2, 147.
Cf.Russia and the West in the Teaching of the Slavophiles, p. 230.
Cf. BRP 1270 note.
Riasanovsky, N. V. [5], p. 1.
See Reference 35.
Riasanovsky, N. V. [5], pp. 211–213.
WERH, Ch. 17, p. 80, B. note.
Riasanovsky, N. V. [5], p. 234.
Sic. Presumably refers to Vaseckij, G. S.et al. [1]; cf.General Works II.
Riasanovsky, N. V. [5], pp. 188–189.
Nikolaj Berdjaev [2R], p. 43. Lavrin ([3], p. 307) expresses much the same idea but the other way round: “In some respectsnarodnichestvo might even strike one as secularised Slavophilism” (though he does add: “with due reservations, of course”).
Cited in Berdjaev [2R], p. 41.
Cf. Riasanovsky, N. V. [5], p. 188.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kemball, R.J. Nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Russian thought. A preliminary review of the literature. Studies in Soviet Thought 5, 30–50 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01043985
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01043985