Abstract
Thermal comfort field experiments were conducted in Singapore in both naturally ventilated highrise residential buildings and air conditioned office buildings. Each of the 818 questionnaire responses was made simultaneously with a detailed set of indoor climatic measurements, and estimates of clothing insulation and metabolic rate. Results for the air conditioned sample indicated that office buildings were overcooled, causing up to one-third of their occupants to experience cool thermal comfort sensations. These observations in air conditioned buildings were broadly consistent with the ISO, ASHRAE and Singapore indoor climatic standards. Indoor climates of the naturally ventilated apartments during the day and early evening were on average three degrees warmer than the ISO comfort standard prescriptions, but caused much less thermal discomfort than expected. Discrepancies between thermal comfort responses in apartment blocks and office buildings are discussed in terms of contemporary perceptual theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASHRAE (1981) ASHRAE/ANSI standard 55–81: Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. ASHRAE, Atlanta
Auliciems A (1981) Towards a psycho-physiological model of thermal perception. Int J Biometerol 25:109–122
Auliciems A (1983) Psycho-physiological criteria for global thermal zones of building design. Int J Biometeorol 26 (Suppl. 2):69–86
Auliciems A, de Dear R (1986) Air conditioning in a tropical climate: Impacts upon European residents in Darwin, Australia. Int J Biometeorol 30:259–282
Ballantyne ER, Hill RK, Spencer JW (1977) Probit analysis of thermal sensation assessments. Int J Biometeorol 21:29–43
Busch J (1990) Thermal responses to the Thai office environment. ASHRAE Trans 96(1):859–872
Carlton-Foss JA (1982) Energy engineering for occupied spaces. ASHRAE J 24:35–39
de Dear RJ (1989) Diurnal and seasonal variations in the human thermal climate of Singapore. Singapore J Trop Geog 10:13–26
de Dear RJ, Auliciems A (1985) Validation of the Predicted Mean Vote model of thermal comfort in six Australian field studies. ASHRAE Trans 91(2):452–468
Elder J, Tibbott RL (1981) User acceptance of an energy efficient office building—A case study of the Norris Cotton Federal Office Building. NBS Bldg Ser No. 130. National Bureau of Standards, Washington DC
Ellis FP (1953) Thermal comfort in warm, humid atmospheres-Observations on groups and individuals in Singapore. J Hyg (Camb) 51:386–404
Fanger PO (1970) Thermal comfort. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen
Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Gagge AP, Nevins RG (1976) Effect of energy conservation guidelines on comfort, acceptability and health. Final Report on Contract No. CO-04-51891-00 of Federal Energy Administration. JB Pierce Lab, New Haven
Gagge AP, Fobelets A, Berglund LG (1986) A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment. ASHRAE Trans 92(2B):709–731
HDB (1987) Housing Development Board of Singapore annual report 1986/87. HDB, Singapore
Helson H (1971) Adaptation-level theory: 1970 and after. In: Appley MH (ed) Adaptation-level theory. Academic Press, New York, pp 5–17
Humphreys MA (1976) Field studies of comfort compared and applied. Bldg Serv Engnr 44:5–27
Humphreys MA (1981) The dependence of comfortable temperatures upon indoor and outdoor climates. In: Cena K, Clark JA (eds) Bioengineering, thermal physiology and comfort. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 229–250
Hunt DRG, Gidman MI (1982) A national field survey of house temperatures. Bldg Environ 17:107–124
ISO (1984) Standard 7730: Moderate thermal environments-determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort. ISO, Geneva
Ittelson WH (1973) Environment perception and contemporary perception theory. In: Ittelson WH (ed) Environment and cognition. Seminar Press, New York, pp 1–19
Knudsen HN, de Dear RJ, Ring JW, Li TL, Puntener TW, Fanger PO (1989) Thermal comfort in passive solar buildings. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby
McCullough EA, Jones BW, Huck J (1985) A comprehensive data base for estimating clothing insulation. ASHRAE Trans 91(2):29–47
McIntyre DA (1978) Seven point scales of warmth. Bldg Serv Engnr 45:215–226
McIntyre DA (1982) Chamber studies-Reductio ad absurdum? Energy Bldgs 5:89–96
Nicol JF, Humphreys MA (1973) Thermal comfort as part of a self-regulating system. In: Langdon FJ, Humphreys MA, Nicol JF (eds) Thermal comfort and moderate heat stress. HMSO, UK, pp 19–34
Olesen BW, Nielsen R (1983) Thermal insulation of clothing measured on a moveable thermal manikin and on human subjects. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby
Proshansky HM (1972) Methodology in environmental psychology: Problems and issues. Human Factors 14:451–460
Russell JA, Ward LM (1982) Environmental psychology. Annu Rev Psychol 33:651–688
Schiller G, Arens E, Benton C, Bauman F (1989) A field study of thermal comfort in office buildings. In: Kulic E, Todorovic B, Novak P (eds) Proceedings of the second world congress on heating, ventilating, refrigerating and air conditioning-CLIMA 2000. REHVA Science Series, Amersfoort, pp 163–169
Singapore Meterological Service (1987) Summary of Observations 1986. Singapore Meteorological Service, Singapore
SISIR (1983) Singapore standard CP13-Code of practice for mechanical ventilation and air-conditioning in buildings. Singapore Institute of Standards and Industrial Research, Singapore
Stokols D (1977) Origins and directions in environment-behavior research. In: Stokols D (ed) Perspectives on environment and behavior. Plenum, New York, pp 5–35
Webb CG (1959) An analysis of some observations of thermal comfort in an equatorial climate. Br J Ind Med 16:297–310
Wong AK, Yeh SHK (1985) Housing a nation: Twenty five years of public housing in Singapore. Maruzen Asia, Singapore
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Dear, R.J., Leow, K.G. & Foo, S.C. Thermal comfort in the humid tropics: Field experiments in air conditioned and naturally ventilated buildings in Singapore. Int J Biometeorol 34, 259–265 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01041840
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01041840