Skip to main content
Log in

Formal rationality, substantive justice, and discrimination

A study of a juvenile court

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which a juvenile court uses legal, substantive, and discriminatory criteria in assessing dispositions. The indicators of legal criteria are the seriousness of offense and the extent of prior arrest record, of substantive criteria, the presence of family and school problems, and of discriminatory criteria, race and social class. An examination of the dispositions accorded to a sample of 464 fourteen and fifteen year old arrestees in one juvenile court shows that, while discrimination in sentencing is minimal, the court is more likely to use substantive than formal criteria of decisionmaking. These findings suggest that studies of the juvenile court should be reoriented away from their traditional focus on “legal” and “extralegal” determinants of decision making toward a focus on substantive criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, W.R. Race and ethnicity relative to other factors in juvenile court dispositions.American Journal of Sociology, 1972,77, 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H.Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W.J., & Seidman, C.B.Law, Order, and Power. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.V.The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.E., & Kluegel, J.R. Determinants of juvenile court dispositions: Ascriptive and achieved factors in two metropolitan courts.American Sociological Review, 1972,43, 162–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culbertson, R. Commitment practices in Indiana's juvenile courts.Juvenile Justice. 1973,24, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N.Sociological Constructions of Deviance. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M.Judging Delinquents: Context and Process in the Juvenile Court. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empey, L.American Delinquency: Its Meaning and Construction. Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, E., and Courtless, T. Pre-dispositional data, role of counsel, and delinquency in juvenile court.Law and Society Review, 1972,7, 195–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. (Ed.).The Labeling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective. New York: Wiley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D.F. Socioeconomic status and criminal sentences: is there an association?American Sociological Review, 1977,42, 174–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J.L. Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: An assessment of a sociological viewpoint.Law and Society Review, 1974,8, 357–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. Labeling theory and juvenile delinquency: An assessment of the evidence. In W. Gove (Ed.),The Labeling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective. New York: Wiley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. Is there a class bias in criminal sentencing?American Sociological Review, 1977,42, 176–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, P. Child convicts.Trans-Action, 1971,8, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D.Delinquency and Drift, New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEachern, A.W., & Bauzer, R. Factors related to disposition in juvenile police contacts. In W. Klein & B.G. Myerhoff (Eds.),Juvenile Gangs in Context. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, S., & Weitzman, L.J. Women as litigants.Hastings Law Journal, 1971,23, 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of JusticeTask Force Report: Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, R.The Social Reality of Crime. Boston: Little-Brown, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H., Waite, E., Bose, D.E., & Berk, R.E. The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences.American Sociological Review, 1974,39, 224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E.M.Radical Non-Intervention: Rethinking the Delinquency Problem. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temin, C.E. Discriminatory sentencing of women offenders: The argument for ERA in a nutshell.American Criminal Law Review, 1973,11, 358–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, R. Discrimination in the handling of juvenile offenders by social control agencies.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1967,4, 218–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.W., & Cage, R.J. The effect of social characteristics on juvenile court dispositions,Sociological Quarterly, 1977,18, 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. Race, socioeconomic status, and sentencing in the juvenile justice system.Criminology, 1973,64, 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R.M.Law in Modern Society. New York: Free Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. M. Rheinstein (Ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954 (first edition, 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellford, C. Labeling theory and criminology: An assessment.Social Problems, 1975,22, 332–345.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by Ford Foundation under grant no. 73-96. We are grateful to Jackson Toby, principal investigator, for his aid in all phases of this study. William Smith and Antonia Steegen provided invaluable research assistance. This is a thoroughly revised version of a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, November, 1977.

About this article

Cite this article

Horwitz, A., Wasserman, M. Formal rationality, substantive justice, and discrimination. Law Hum Behav 4, 103–115 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040486

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040486

Keywords

Navigation