Skip to main content
Log in

Do legal variables predict police decisions regarding the prosecution of juvenile offenders?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

This study investigated whether legal variables predict police dispositions as regards the prosecution of juveniles. For this purpose first apprehensions of a sample of 479 Israeli adolescents (aged 13.5–15.5) in a one-year period were analyzed. The association between the legal variables and police dispositions was analyzed separately within four hierarchical stages of involvement with the juvenile justice system. Previous referral to court and previous court appearance were found to be excellent predictors of police decision to prosecute. However, in the earlier stages of involvement with the juvenile justice system, (i.e., when juveniles had no previous court referrals or appearances), the predicting power of the few available legal variables (type and seriousness of offense and number of previous police apprehensions) was found to be negligible. In the discussion of the findings, the contradicting labeling and deterrence theories are applied to the functioning of the juvenile units within the police: The present study has empirically identified the specific point where police decision-making reflects a switch-over from the labeling to the deterrence approach. Some suggestions for future research are put forward in order to improve the predictability of police dispositions at the early stages of the juvenile's involvement with the criminal justice system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black, D.J., & Reiss, A.J. Police Control of Juveniles.American Sociological Review, 1970,35, 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.V.The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice New York: John Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, N.The Differential Selection of Juvenile Offenders for Court Appearance. National Council on Crime and Delinquency, 1963.

  • Gibbs, J.P.Crime, Punishment and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartjen, C.A.Crime and Criminalization. New York: Praeger, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. Labelling theory and juvenile delinquency: An assessment of the evidence. In Gove, Walter (Ed.)The Labelling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective. New York: Wiley, 1975, pp. 181–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel Police Annual Report, 1975. Jerusalem: The Publication Section, Public Relation and Information Division, Israel Police H.Q., 1976.

  • Israel Police Annual Report, 1976. Jerusalem: The Publication Section, Public Relation and Information Division, Israel Police H.Q., 1977.

  • Landau, S.F. Discrimination in the handling of juvenile offenders by the police: Some Israeli findings. Presented at the Ninth International Congress of Sociology, Upsala, August, 1978.

  • Lemert, E.M.Human Deviance, Social Problems, and Social Control. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEachern, A.W., & Bauzer, R. Factors related to disposition in juvenile police contacts. In Klein, Malcolm W., and Myerhoff, Barbara G. (Eds.)Juvenile Gangs in Context. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967, pp. 148–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, I., & Briar, S. Police encounters with juveniles.American Journal of Sociology, 1964,70, 206–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, R.The Social Reality of Crime. Boston: Little Brown, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H., Waite, E., Bose, C.E., & Berk, R.E. The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences.American Sociological Review, 1974,39, 224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E.M.Labelling Deviant Behavior: Its Sociological Implications New York: Harper and Row, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, R.M. Discrimination in the handling of juvenile offenders by social control agencies.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1967,4, 218–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. Race, Socioenconomic status and sentencing in the juvenile justice system.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1973,64, 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C.R. Deterrents or labelling?Social Forces, 1975,53, 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C.R., & Rowe, A.R. Certainty of arrest and crime rates: A further test of the deterrence hypothesis.Social Forces, 1974,52, 455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, N.L., & Willie, C.V. Decisions by juvenile officers.American Journal of Sociology, 1971,77, 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, C. Labelling Theory and Criminology: An assessment.Social Problems, 1975,22, 332–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F.E., & Hawkins, G.J.Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Landau, S.F. Do legal variables predict police decisions regarding the prosecution of juvenile offenders?. Law Hum Behav 2, 95–105 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040386

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040386

Keywords

Navigation