Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling conserved nutrient limited growth: Effects of a bound substrate pool

  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An extension to the model previously presented by Brown et al. (1988) is developed for the case of a conserved substrate that is incorporated into the cell structure. It is shown that the model can predict both an inflection point and a period of essentially linear growth. Effects of the adjustable parameters and the ability to predict experimental results are determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, D.E., Gaddum, R.N. and McAvoy, A. (1988).Biotechnology Letters, 10, No. 8, 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantero, D., (1988).Biotechnology Letters, 10, No. 10, 759–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, W.R., (1988). Personal Communication.

  • Nyholm, N. (1976).Biotechnology Bioengineering, 18, 1043–1056.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westgate, P., Emery, A.H. Modeling conserved nutrient limited growth: Effects of a bound substrate pool. Biotechnol Lett 11, 555–560 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040035

Keywords

Navigation