Skip to main content
Log in

Illustrating two complementary enterprises at the interface of psychology and religion through reading Winnicott

  • Articles
  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our work at the interface of psychology and religion can proceed in two complementary directions. When reading a psychological theory, (1) we may pay special attention to how certain concepts in particular, and the system of ideas as a whole, are being or might be used to interpret religious phenomena. We may focus on how those ideas may be involved in doing “psychology of religion”: the psychological interpretation of religious phenomena. Alternatively, (2) we may pay special attention to how certain concepts in particular, and the system of ideas as a whole, are being or might be used, either implicitly or explicitly, to make claims about “human nature,” about the meaning and purpose of life, about “God.” We may identify the “psychology as religion-theology”: psychological ideas potentially functioning in a religious-theological manner. I will illustrate this by: (a) examining D. W. Winnicott's article, “Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena” (1953/1986) in terms of three successive concepts or categories: transitional object, transitional phenomena, and “a third intermediate area of experiencing”; (b) considering how these categories can be used in psychology “of” religion; (c) reconsidering how the “psychological” categories may function “as” religious-theological. The discussion is intended to illustrate how we might more fully appreciate how and why a psychological theory may “work” well in doing psychology of religion when we more fully appreciate how that psychology implicitly functions as theology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkema, P. (1981). The borderline personality and transitional relatedness.American Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 172–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1986). An agenda item for psychology of religion: Getting respect.Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 5, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. (1985).Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S. (1980). Transitional objects: Idealization of a phenomenon.Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 49, 561–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S. (1987).Religious Thought and the Modern Psychologies. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, F. (1977). Theme and variation in the development of the first transitional object.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 58, 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppolillo, H. P. (1967). Maturational aspects of the transitional phenomenon.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 48, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppolillo, H. P. (1976). The transitional phenomenon revisited.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1, 36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, D. V. (1976). “The intimate edge” and the “third area.”Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 12, 489–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953–73). Obsessive acts and religious practices. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 115–128). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953–73). Totem and taboo. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13, pp. 1–161). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1913)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953–73). The future of an illusion. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 1–56). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1927)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953–73). Civilization and its discontents. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 57–146). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1930)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953–73). Moses and monotheism. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 1–138). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1939)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, V. (1983). Winnicott's contribution to religious studies: The resurrection of the culture hero.Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 51, 371–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, S., & Barkin, (Eds.). (1978).Between reality and fantasy: Transitional objects and phenomena. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, M. K. (1978). The transitional phenomena: A theoretical integration.The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 33, 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, P. C. (1981).Solace—The missing dimension in psychiatry. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, P., Gewertz, H., & Kreutter, K. (1988).The solace paradigm: An eclectic search for psychological immunity. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonte-Pace, D. (1987). Object relations theory, mothering, and religion: Toward a feminist psychology of religion.Horizons, 14, 310–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahne, M. J. (1987). On the persistence of transitional phenomena into adult life.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 48, 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, H. M. (1986). The psychology of religion and the religion of psychology.Journal of Pastoral Counseling, 21, 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDargh, J. (1983).Psychoanalytic object relations theory and the study of religion. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDargh, J. (1986). God, mother and me: An object relational perspective on religious material.Pastoral Psychology, 34, 251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, W. W. (1984).Psychoanalysis and religious experience. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, W. W. (1987).Life and faith: Psychological perspectives on religious experience. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, A. (1968).Object love and reality. New York: International Universities Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, A. (1970). The transitional object and the creative act.Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 39, 240–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, A. (1984).Psychoanalysis in a new context. New York: International Universities Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruyser, P. (1983).The play of the imagination: Toward a psychoanalysis of culture. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzuto, A. -M. (1979).The birth of the living god: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1986). Self psychology as a “postrnodern” science.Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 6, 459–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitz, P. (1977).Psychology as religion: The cult of self-worship. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. InPlaying and reality. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1953)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlauch, C.R. Illustrating two complementary enterprises at the interface of psychology and religion through reading Winnicott. Pastoral Psychol 39, 47–63 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01037183

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01037183

Keywords

Navigation