Abstract
Our work at the interface of psychology and religion can proceed in two complementary directions. When reading a psychological theory, (1) we may pay special attention to how certain concepts in particular, and the system of ideas as a whole, are being or might be used to interpret religious phenomena. We may focus on how those ideas may be involved in doing “psychology of religion”: the psychological interpretation of religious phenomena. Alternatively, (2) we may pay special attention to how certain concepts in particular, and the system of ideas as a whole, are being or might be used, either implicitly or explicitly, to make claims about “human nature,” about the meaning and purpose of life, about “God.” We may identify the “psychology as religion-theology”: psychological ideas potentially functioning in a religious-theological manner. I will illustrate this by: (a) examining D. W. Winnicott's article, “Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena” (1953/1986) in terms of three successive concepts or categories: transitional object, transitional phenomena, and “a third intermediate area of experiencing”; (b) considering how these categories can be used in psychology “of” religion; (c) reconsidering how the “psychological” categories may function “as” religious-theological. The discussion is intended to illustrate how we might more fully appreciate how and why a psychological theory may “work” well in doing psychology of religion when we more fully appreciate how that psychology implicitly functions as theology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arkema, P. (1981). The borderline personality and transitional relatedness.American Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 172–177.
Batson, C. D. (1986). An agenda item for psychology of religion: Getting respect.Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 5, 6–11.
Bernstein, R. (1985).Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Brody, S. (1980). Transitional objects: Idealization of a phenomenon.Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 49, 561–605.
Browning, D. S. (1987).Religious Thought and the Modern Psychologies. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
Busch, F. (1977). Theme and variation in the development of the first transitional object.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 58, 479–486.
Coppolillo, H. P. (1967). Maturational aspects of the transitional phenomenon.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 48, 237–246.
Coppolillo, H. P. (1976). The transitional phenomenon revisited.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1, 36–47.
Ehrenberg, D. V. (1976). “The intimate edge” and the “third area.”Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 12, 489–495.
Freud, S. (1953–73). Obsessive acts and religious practices. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 115–128). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1970)
Freud, S. (1953–73). Totem and taboo. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13, pp. 1–161). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1913)
Freud, S. (1953–73). The future of an illusion. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 1–56). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1927)
Freud, S. (1953–73). Civilization and its discontents. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 57–146). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1930)
Freud, S. (1953–73). Moses and monotheism. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 1–138). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1939)
Gay, V. (1983). Winnicott's contribution to religious studies: The resurrection of the culture hero.Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 51, 371–395.
Grolnick, S., & Barkin, (Eds.). (1978).Between reality and fantasy: Transitional objects and phenomena. New York: Jason Aronson.
Hong, M. K. (1978). The transitional phenomena: A theoretical integration.The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 33, 47–49.
Horton, P. C. (1981).Solace—The missing dimension in psychiatry. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Horton, P., Gewertz, H., & Kreutter, K. (1988).The solace paradigm: An eclectic search for psychological immunity. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Jonte-Pace, D. (1987). Object relations theory, mothering, and religion: Toward a feminist psychology of religion.Horizons, 14, 310–327.
Kahne, M. J. (1987). On the persistence of transitional phenomena into adult life.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 48, 247–258.
Maloney, H. M. (1986). The psychology of religion and the religion of psychology.Journal of Pastoral Counseling, 21, 22–33.
McDargh, J. (1983).Psychoanalytic object relations theory and the study of religion. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.
McDargh, J. (1986). God, mother and me: An object relational perspective on religious material.Pastoral Psychology, 34, 251–263
Meissner, W. W. (1984).Psychoanalysis and religious experience. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Meissner, W. W. (1987).Life and faith: Psychological perspectives on religious experience. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
Modell, A. (1968).Object love and reality. New York: International Universities Press, 1968.
Modell, A. (1970). The transitional object and the creative act.Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 39, 240–250.
Modell, A. (1984).Psychoanalysis in a new context. New York: International Universities Press, 1984.
Pruyser, P. (1983).The play of the imagination: Toward a psychoanalysis of culture. New York: International Universities Press.
Rizzuto, A. -M. (1979).The birth of the living god: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Toulmin, S. (1986). Self psychology as a “postrnodern” science.Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 6, 459–477.
Vitz, P. (1977).Psychology as religion: The cult of self-worship. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans.
Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. InPlaying and reality. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1953)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlauch, C.R. Illustrating two complementary enterprises at the interface of psychology and religion through reading Winnicott. Pastoral Psychol 39, 47–63 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01037183
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01037183