, Volume 68, Issue 3, pp 446–455 | Cite as

Effects of plant spinescence on large mammalian herbivores

  • Susan M. Cooper
  • Norman Owen-Smith
Original Papers


Plant thorns and spines had these effects on the feeding behaviour of the three species of browsing ungulate that we studied, kudu, impala and domestic goats: (i) bite sizes were restricted, in most cases to single leaves or leaf clusters; (ii) hooked thorns retarded biting rates; (iii) the acceptability of those plant species offering small leaf size in conjunction with prickles was lower, at least for the kudus, than those of other palatable plant species; (iv) the inhibitory effect of prickles on feeding was much less for the smaller impalas and goats than for the larger kudus; (v) from certain hook-thorned species the kudus bit off shoot ends despite their prickles; (vi) for certain straight-thorned species the kudus compensated partially for the slow eating rates obtained by extending their feeding durations per encounter. Most spinescent species were similar in their acceptability to the ungulates to unarmed palatable species, despite higher crude protein contents in their foliage than the latter. Such structural features furthermore reduce the tissue losses incurred by plants per encounter by a large ungulate herbivore, by restricting the eating rates that the animals obtain. In this way prickles function to restrict foliage losses to large herbivores below the levels that might otherwise occur.


Protein Content Structural Feature Crude Protein Eating Rate Tissue Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahamson WG (1979) Patterns of resource allocation in wildflower populations of fields and woods. Am J Bot 66:71–79Google Scholar
  2. Brown WL Jr (1960) Ants, Acacias and browsing mammals. Ecology 41:587–592Google Scholar
  3. Carlquist S (1974) Island biology. Columbia Univ PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper SM, Owen-Smith N (in preparation) Food selection by three species of browsing ruminant in relation to plant chemistryGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawley MJ (1983) Herbivory: the dynamics of animal — plant interactions. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunham KM (1980) The feeding behaviour of a tame impalaAepyceros melampus. Afr J Ecol 18:253–257Google Scholar
  7. Guggisberg CAW (1966) S.O.S. Rhino. Andre Deutsch, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Hassel RH (1982) Incidence of rabies in kudu in South West Africa/Namibia. S Afr J Sci 78:418–421Google Scholar
  9. Janzen DH (1979) New horizons in the biology of plant defenses. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores. Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 331–350Google Scholar
  10. Janzen DH, Martin PS (1982) Neotropical anachronisms: the fruit the Gomphotheres ate. Science 215:19–27Google Scholar
  11. Kozlowski TT (1971) Growth and development of trees, Vol 1. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Novellie PA (1982) The feeding ecology of the kudu in the Kruger National Park. DSc Thesis, University of PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  13. Owen-Smith N (1979) Assessing the foraging efficiency of a large herbivore, the kudu. S Afr J Wildl Res 9:102–110Google Scholar
  14. Owen-Smith N, Cooper SM (submitted a) Assessing food selection by large herbivoresGoogle Scholar
  15. Owen-Smith N, Cooper SM (submitted b) A palatability classification of the woody plants in a South African savanna with reference to browsing ruminantsGoogle Scholar
  16. Owen-Smith N, Novellie P (1982) What should a clever ungulate eat? Am Nat 119:151–177Google Scholar
  17. Pellew RA (1984) Food consumption and energy budgets of giraffe. J Appl Ecol 21:141–159Google Scholar
  18. Stephenson GR, Roberts TW (1977) The SSR System 7: a generalized encoding system with computerized transcription. Behav Res Methods Instrum 9:434–441Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan M. Cooper
    • 1
  • Norman Owen-Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Resource EcologyUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations