Skip to main content
Log in

Response to criticism in V. A. Borovikov's and B. E. Kinber's paper: “Errors in the ‘universal and sufficient’ heuristic criteria of estimating validity limits of geometric optics and of the geometric theory of diffraction”

  • Published:
Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. V. A. Borovikov and B. E. Kinber, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Radiofiz.,30, No. 10, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Asatryan, Brief Commun. in Physics [in Russian], No. 10, 17 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. P. Yarygin, Radiotekh. Elektron.,25, 1826 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. A. Kravtsov, Radiotekh. Elecktron.,32, 883 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Institute of General Physics, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Translated from Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Radiofizika, Vol. 30, No. 10, pp. 1237–1242, October, 1987.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kravtsov, Y.A. Response to criticism in V. A. Borovikov's and B. E. Kinber's paper: “Errors in the ‘universal and sufficient’ heuristic criteria of estimating validity limits of geometric optics and of the geometric theory of diffraction”. Radiophys Quantum Electron 30, 912–917 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034854

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034854

Keywords

Navigation