A probabilistic approach to the assessment of uranium resources

  • Kamal Golabi
  • Alan Lamont
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a probabilistic approach to the estimation of uranium resources that allows for the integration of geologic observations with the experience and judgment of geologists. The paper focuses on estimating roll-front type deposits. The approach is based on a quantitative material balance model of ore formation that describes the quantity of uranium resources in terms of several key parameters constituting the quantity of uranium entering a host, and the fraction of the entering uranium that has been precipitated. The parameters cannot necessarily be measured in the field, but they can be inferred from available information and interpretation of field observations. The key to this approach is eliciting these inferences from geologists, representing the uncertainties inherent in drawing the geologic inferences as probability distributions, and combining the distributions to arrive at a probability distribution for uranium resources in a region. This paper presents the model, procedures for eliciting subjective probabilities and updating the distribution over resources within a Bayesian framework, and a demonstration of the procedure by obtaining estimates for three roll-front type deposits in Wyoming.

Key words

Uranium resource estimation probability Bayes roll-front deposits 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, F. C., 1970, Geologic factors controlling uranium resources in the Gas Hills District, Wyoming: Wyoming Geol. Assoc. Guidebook, p. 31–44.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, R. V., and Childers, M. O., 1977, Applied mineral exploration with special reference to uranium: Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 542 p.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchfield, D. M., 1980, Methodology for uranium estimates and reliability: U.S. Department of Energy, Grand Junction.Google Scholar
  4. Golabi, K. and Lamont, A., 1978. Study to integrate NURE data: Woodward-Clyde Consultants, San Francisco, NTIS no. GJBX-25 (79), 92 p.Google Scholar
  5. Harris, D. P., 1977a, Quantitative methods for the appraisal of mineral resources: Dept. of Mining and Geological Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  6. Harris, D. P., 1977b, Informational and conceptual issues of uranium resources and potential supply: Workshop on Energy Information, Institute of Energy Studies, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  7. Rackley, R. I., 1976, Origin of Western-States type uranium mineralization,in Wolf, K. H. (Ed.) Handbook of stratabound and strataform ore deposits (vol. 7): Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
  8. Spetzler, C. S. and Stael von Holstein, C. A., 1975, Probability encoding in decision analysis: Man. Sci., v. 22, n. 3, p. 340–358.Google Scholar
  9. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1974, Judgments under uncertainty, heuristics and biases: Science, v. 185, p. 1124–1131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamal Golabi
    • 1
  • Alan Lamont
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Woodward-Clyde Consultants3 Embarcadero CenterSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations