Skip to main content
Log in

The 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: A brief critique

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines of the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission represent an improvement over previous horizontal merger guidelines in certain respects especially in the treatment of entry. However, the 1992 Guidelines continue to suffer from problems with market definition methodology. Also, the softening of HHI presumptions and burdens and the incorporation of an increased competitive effects section seem to reduce the effectiveness of the Guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block, M. K. Nold, F. C. and J. G. Sidaks (1981) ‘The deterrent effect antitrust enforcement’,Journal of Political Economy,89, 429–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Franklin M. (1989) ‘Games economists play: A noncooperative view’,Rand Journal of Economics,20, 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Guidelines’ (1992) Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission horizontal merger guidelines, repr in 4 Trade Reg. Rep. (CCH) ¶13,104 (April 2, 1992).

  • ‘Guidelines — 1984’ (1984) Department of Justice, merger guidelines, repr in 4 Trade Reg. Rep. (CCH) ¶13,103 (June 18, 1984).

  • Jacquemin, Alexis and Margaret E. Slade (1989) ‘Cartels, collusion, and horizontal merger’, in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds,Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Willard F. and Russell C. Parker (1992) ‘The bakers of Washington cartel: twenty-five years later’,Review of Industrial Organization,7, 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard F. (1976)Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rill, James F. (1990)Antitrust,4, 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rill, James F. (1992) ‘60 minutes with the Honorable James F. Rill, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice’, 61 Antitrust L. J. (forthcoming).

  • Salop, Steven C. (1991) ‘Comments and discussion [of R. Willig's paper]’,Brookings Papers on Microeconomics, 311–322.

  • Scherer, F. M. and David Ross (1990)Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, George W. and Willard F. Mueller (1955) ‘The cellophane case and the new competition’,American Economic Review,45, 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Myron W. (1961) ‘Electrical Equipment Antitrust Cases — Their Implications for Government and for business’,University of Chicago Law Review,29, 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Dennis A. and Kevin J. Arquit (1992) ‘Applying the 1992 horizontal merger guidelines,Antitrust,6, 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and not of any state or federal agency.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueller, W.F., O'Connor, K.J. The 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: A brief critique. Rev Ind Organ 8, 163–172 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034175

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034175

Key words

Navigation