Advertisement

Resolving controls on epeiric sedimentation using trend surface analysis

  • W. L. Watney
Article

Abstract

An understanding of patterns of regional sedimentation is crucial to identifying trends of perspective petroleum reservoirs. The Upper Pennsylvanian, Missourian Kansas City Group consists of repetitions of widespread carbonate rock and shale. Each of four cyclothems chosen for subsurface study of western Kansas contains transgressive and regressive lithofacies with evidence of extensive subaerial exposure across the entire paleoshelf. Distribution of carbonate facies on the 350+ km-wide shelf was affected strongly by slight changes in structural configuration of the shelf and variations in sea level. Polynomial trend surface models prepared from selected wireline log information for four successive cyclothems assist in resolving regional and local patterns of sedimentation and help to access the effect of subtle structural deformation on sedimentation. Isopachs of marine portions of four cyclothems were fit by fourth-order trend surfaces, optimizing fit by comparing goodness-of-fit and minimizing skewness of residuals using the smallest order surface. Several cyclothems showed simple patterns of regional, basinward thickening with local, strike-elongated anomalies where goodness-of-fit was maximized with increasing order. One cyclothem did not converge to a good fit at small orders nor did distribution of residuals indicate convergence toward zero. Both anomalies reflected a more complex surface. Rather than thickening regionally, the pattern created by this anomalous cyclothem was more irregular. Mapped patterns resemble those of the present-day structural configuration of these horizons suggesting a general persistence in similar epeirogenic deformation.

Key words

Trend surface cyclothem sedimentation Missourian Kansas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, M. M., 1967, Carbonate sand bodies of Florida and the Bahamas: Jour. Sedi. Pet., v. 37, p. 556–591.Google Scholar
  2. Bornemann, E. and Doveton, J. H., 1983, Lithofacies mapping of Viola Limestone in South-Central Kansas, based on wireline logs: Amer. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., v. 67, no. 4, p. 609–623.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, V., 1976, Precambrian structure of Kansas: Kan. Geol. Sur., map M-7.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, J. C., 1973, Statistics and data analysis in geology: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 550 p.Google Scholar
  5. Duff, P., McL. D., Hallam, A., and Walton, E. K. (Eds.), 1967, Cyclic sedimentation: Developments in sedimentology 10, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 280 p.Google Scholar
  6. Harris, P. M., 1975, Facies anatomy and diagenesis of a Bahamian ooid shoal: Ginsburg, R. N. (Ed.), Sedimenta VII, University of Miami, Florida, 163 p.Google Scholar
  7. Heckel, P. H. and Baesmann, J. F., 1975, Environmental interpretation of conodont distribution in Upper Pennsylvanian (Missourian) megacyclothems in eastern Kansas: Amer. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., v. 53, p. 486–508.Google Scholar
  8. Heckel, P. H., 1977, Origin of phosphatic block shale facies in Pennsylvanian cyclothems of Midcontinent North America: Amer. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., v. 61, no. 7, p. 1043–1068.Google Scholar
  9. Heckel, P. H., 1980, Paleogeography of eustatic model for deposition of Midcontinent Upper Pennsylvanian cyclothems,in T. D. Fouch and E. R. Magathan (Eds.), Paleozoic paleogeography of west-central United States, Symposium 1: Rocky Mountain Section SEPM, p. 197–215.Google Scholar
  10. Heckel, P. H., 1983, Diagenetic model for carbonate rocks in Midcontinent Pennsylvanian eustatic cyclothems: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 53, p. 733–759.Google Scholar
  11. Koch, G. S., Jr. and Link, R. F., 1980, Statistical analysis of geological data: vol. I, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 375 p.Google Scholar
  12. Merriam, D. F., 1963, The geological history of Kansas: Kans. Geol. Sur. Bull. 162, 317 p.Google Scholar
  13. Merriam, D. F. (Ed.), 1964, Symposium on cyclic sedimentation: Kans. Geol. Surv. Bull. 169, v. 1 and 2, 636 p.Google Scholar
  14. Moore, R. C., 1931, Pennsylvanian cycles in the northern Mid-Continent region: Ill. Geol. Surv. Bull. 60, p. 247–257.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, R. C., 1932, A reclassification of the Pennsylvanian system in the northern Midcontinent region: Kans. Geol. Soci. Guidebook, 6th annual field conference, p. 79–98.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, J. V., 1952, Correlation of radioactive logs of the Lansing and Kansas City groups in central Kansas: Jour. Pet. Tech., v. 4, no. 6, p. 111–118.Google Scholar
  17. Multer, H. G., 1977, Field guide to some carbonate rock environments—Florida Keys and Western Bahamas: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, Iowa, 415 p.Google Scholar
  18. Parkhurst, R. W., 1959, Surface to subsurface correlations and oil entrapment in the Lansing and Kansas City groups (Pennsylvanian) in northwest Kansas: M.S. thesis, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  19. Wanless, H. R., 1931, Pennsylvanian cycles in western Ilinois: Ill. Geol. Surv. Bull., v. 60, p. 179–193.Google Scholar
  20. Wanless, H. R. and Shepard, F. P., 1936, Sea level and climatic changes related to Late Paleozoic cycles: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v. 47, no. 8, p. 1177–1206.Google Scholar
  21. Watney, W. L., 1980, Cyclic sedimentation of Lansing—Kansas City groups in northwestern Kansas and southwestern Nebraska: Kan. Geol. Surv. Bull. 220, 72 p.Google Scholar
  22. Watney, W. L., 1983, Carbonate dominated shelf cycles in the Late Pennsylvanian of the Midcontinent U.S.A., Intra and extrabasinal controls on sedimentation and early diagenesis (Abstract): Amer. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., v. 67, no. 3, p. 567.Google Scholar
  23. Watney, W. L. and Paul, S. E., 1983, Oil exploration and production in Kansas—Present activity and future potential: Oil Gas Jour., July 25, p. 193–198.Google Scholar
  24. Watney, W. L., in preparation, Origin of four Upper Pennsylvanian (Missourian) sedimentary cycles in the subsurface of western Kansas: Kans. Geol. Surv. Bull.Google Scholar
  25. Watney, W. L., 1984, Recognition of favorable reservoir trends in Upper Pennsylvanian cyclic carbonates in western Kansas,in Hynes, H. J. (Ed.), Limestones of the midcontinent, Tulsa Geological Society Special Publication no. 2: Tulsa Geological Society, Tulsa, p. 201–245.Google Scholar
  26. Weller, J. M., 1930, Cyclical sedimentation of the Pennsylvanian period and its significance: Jour. Geol., v. 38, p. 97–135.Google Scholar
  27. Yarger, 1983, Regional interpretation of Kansas aeromagnetic data: Kans. Geol. Surv. Geophys. Ser. 1, 35 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. L. Watney
    • 1
  1. 1.Kansas Geological SurveyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations