Skip to main content
Log in

Voltammetric behaviour of iron in cement Part IV: Effect of acetate and urea additions

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of acetate and urea on the cyclic voltammetric behaviour of iron in cured cement paste were investigated. The voltammetric results indicate that sodium acetate and urea do not cause depassivation of iron in cement. The addition of ∼0.2 M of either sodium acetate or urea prevents depassivation of iron in cement exposed to 0.1 M sodium chloride upon potential cycling. However, the addition of even relatively high concentrations of sodium acetate or urea (e.g. 1.0 M), cannot prevent depassivation by 0.2 M sodium chloride upon potential cycling. The voltammetric results also indicate that sodium acetate, urea, and calcium magnesium acetate (CMA) are only marginally effective as corrosion inhibitors for reinforced concrete, compared with an inhibitor of known effectiveness, such as sodium nitrite. Thus, while acetates and urea may well be ‘non-corrosive’ deicers when used by themselves, large amounts of sodium chloride should not be mixed with acetates or urea as a cost-reducing measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. L. Page and D. W. J. Treadway,Nature 297 (1982) 109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Tinnea,Mater. Perform. 26(12) (1987) 9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. E. Locke, K. J. Kennelley, M. D. Boren and V. Luster,Transp. Res. Rec. 1113 (1987) 30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. L. McCrum.Mater. Perform. 28(12) (1989) 24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. N. Hansen,U.S. Patent 4 698 173 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Vogel,Ger. Offen. DE 3 434, 953 (1986).

  7. J. Pelikan, J. Vosta, J. Mostecky, M. Smrz and J. Lohnisky,Czech. Patent 184 118 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. T. Hinatsu, W. F. Graydon and F. R. Foulkes,J. Appl. Electrochem. 19 (1989) 868.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 20 (1990) 841.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 21 (1991) 425.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. K. Gouda and G. E. Monfore,J. Res. Dev. Labs Portld. Cem. Assoc. 7(3) (1965) 24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. F. Griffen, in ‘Corrosion of Metals in Concrete,’ ACI SP 49-8, American Concrete Institute, Detroit (1975) p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. S. Berke,Mater. Perform. 28(10) (1989) 41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Andrade, C. Alonso and J. A. Gonzalez,Cem. Coner. and Aggreg 8(2) (1986) 110.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Ratinov, S. Yenisherlova and R. Zagirova, Durability of Concrete (Prague),Prelim. Rept. (1969) D-135.

  16. C. Boqi, H. Dinghai, G. Hengquan and Z. Yinghao,Cem. and Concr. Res. 13 (1983) 603.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. P. Virmani, K. C. Clear and T. J. Pasko, FWHA Report No. FWHA/RE-83/012, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ushirode, W.M., Hinatsu, J.T. & Foulkes, F.R. Voltammetric behaviour of iron in cement Part IV: Effect of acetate and urea additions. J Appl Electrochem 22, 224–229 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01030181

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01030181

Keywords

Navigation