Advertisement

Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 6, Issue 1–4, pp 5–14 | Cite as

Electronic structure of hydrogen-like impurities in nearly-free-electron metals

Article

Abstract

Recent developments in our understanding of the electronic structure of hydrogen and its isotopes in simple metals is reviewed. The role of nonlinear electron density distribution in the interpretation of the electronic properties of hydrogen-like impurities is emphasized. Calculated Knight shifts and hyperfine fields at μ+ site and electric field gradients at cubic host nuclear sites due to interstitial μ+ are compared with recent experimental data. The feasibility of using positive muon as a probe of defect structure is discussed. Future experiments and theoretical investigations aimed at a deeper understanding of the electronic properties of μ+ are suggested.

Keywords

Hydrogen Thin Film Density Distribution Electronic Property Deep Understanding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Z. D. Popovic et al., Phys. Rev. B.13, 590 (1976).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. O. Almbladh et al., Phys. Rev. B.14, 2250 (1976).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. Zaremba et al., J. Phys. F.7, 1763 (1977).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Jena and K. S. Singwi, Phys. Rev. B17, 3518 (1978).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Schenk,Nuclear and Particle Physics at Intermediate Energies, ed. J. B. Warren (Plenum, New York) 1976.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964); W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    U. von Barth and L. Hedin, J. Phys. C5, 1629, (1972); A. K. Rajagopal and J. Callaway, Phys. Rev.137, 1912, (1973).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. Jena, K. S. Singwi and R. M. Nieminen, Phys. Rev. B17, 301 (1978). The discrepancy in the spin-density enhancement, η (O) at large rs between this calculation and that of Ref. 9 is due to an inaccurate treatment of the bound state contribution in Ref. 8. This difference is now resolved and we agree with the results of Ref. 9. The ambient spin-densities, ζ0 used in this reference were taken from Ref. 5 and are wrong for, Fe and Co. (See Ref. 22 for details.)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Munjal and K. Petzinger, Hyperfine Int.4, 301 (1978).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    V. G. Grvebinnik, et al., JETP Lett.23, 8 (1976).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Jena, F. Y. Fradin and D. E. Ellis (to be published).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. W. Veal, D. J. Lam and D. G. Westlake (to be published).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    W. Kohn and S. H. Vosko, Phys. Rev.118, 912 (1960).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Blandin and J. Friedel, J. Phys. Radium21, 689 (1960).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. Grüner and M. Minier, Adv. Phys.26, 231 (1977).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Camani et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 836 (1977).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    O. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 832 (1977).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Jena, S. G. Das and K. S. Singwi, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 264 (1978).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. F. Meier, Helv. Phys. Acta48, 227 (1975).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    E. Daniel and J. Friedel, J. Phys. Chem. Solids24, 1601 (1963).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    D. P. Hutchinson et al., Phys. Rev.131, 1351 (1963).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    C. G. Shull,Magnetic and Inelastic Scattering of Neutrons by Metals, ed. T. J. Roeland and P. A. Beck, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1967; L. W. Roeland et al., (to be published).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. L. G. Foy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1064 (1973); I. I. Gurevich et al., JETP42, 222 (1976); N. Nishida et al., Solid State Comm.22, 235 (1977); H. Graf et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 1644 (1976); I. I. Gurevich et al., JETP42, 741 (1976); and H. Graf et al., Solid State Comm.23, 653 (1977).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    B. N. Harmon and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B10, 1979 (1972).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    A. C. Switendick, Int. J. Quantum Chem.5, 459 (1971).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    W. B. Gauster et al., Sol. State Comm.24, 619 (1977).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    W. J. Kossler et al., (to be published).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    P. Jena, Sol. State Comm. (to be published).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© North-Holland Publishing Company 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Jena
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsMichigan Technological UniversityHoughton
  2. 2.Materials Science DivisionArgonne National LaboratoryArgonne

Personalised recommendations