Zusammenfassung
Die Hemmwirkung der Cellobiose und Glucose auf die cellulytische Aktivität der Oliven wird untersucht. Die Glucose wirkt als schwaches Hemmittel, während die Cellobiose einen starken Einfluß hat. In Gegenwart von Dixon konnte der konkurrenzlose Charakter der Hemmung belegt werden (Ki Cellobiose 43,8 mM; Ki Glycose 471 mM). Die Wirkung der Ascorbinsäure, Weinsäure, Natrium-Kalium-Tartrat, Eisengluconat und Eisenlactat wurden ebenfalls untersucht.
Summary
The inhibitory effect of cellobiose and glucose on the cellulolytic activity of olives was studied. The glucose acts as a slight inhibitor, whereas the cellobiose exercises a greater inhibition. By means of Dixon's representation, the competitive nature of the inhibition was established (Ki cellobiose 43.8 mM; Ki glucose 471 mM). The inhibiting effect of ascorbic acid, tartaric acid, sodium-potassium tartrate, ferrous gluconate and ferrous lactate was also studied.
References
Pressey R (1977) ACS Symp Ser 47:172
Yamaki SH, Matsuda K (1977) Plant Cell Physiol 18:81
Lewis LN, Varner JE (1970) Plant Physiol 46:194
Reid PD (1974) Plant Physiol 53:732
Byrne H (1975) J Biol Chem 250:1012
Awad M, Lewis SLN (1980) J Food Sci 45:1625
Paull RE, Chem NJ (1983) Plant Physiol 72:382
Mustafa AB, Harper DB, Jhonston DE (1986) J Sci Food Agric 37:43
Parr DM, Dickinson DB (1973) Plant Physiol 51:577
Bell TA, Etchells JL, Singleton JA, Samart W (1965) J Food Sci 30:233
Buesher R, Hudson M (1984) J Food Sci 49:954
Hinton DM, Pressey R (1974) J Food Sci 39:783
Almin KE, Eriksson KE (1967) Biochim Biophys Acta 139:238
Almin KE, Eriksson KE, Jansson C (1967) Biochim Biophys Acta 139:248
Tyn DY, Mandels M (1980) Enzyme Micro Technol 2:91
Schwimmer S (1980) In: Source book of food enzymology. AVI Publishing Company, Westport CT
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heredia, A., Fernandez-Bolaños, J. & Guillen, R. Inhibitors of cellulolytic activity in olive fruits (Olea europaea, Hojiblanca var.). Z Lebensm Unters Forch 189, 216–218 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01028066
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01028066