Abstract
In this study three experiments investigate the relationship of sensitivity to word structure to direct and indirect measures of reading achievement in normal high school and college students using a four-part morpheme Sensitivity Test (MST). This test assesses knowledge of the syntactic category of common noun, verb, and adjective suffixes (Part 1), the ability to generalize this knowledge to novel forms (Part 2), the ability to distinguish derivationally-related word pairs from pseudo-related word pairs (Part 3), and knowledge of how suffixes differ in their effect on syllable boundaries in the complex word (Part 4). Experiment 1 showed that the SAT Verbal scores of 26 undergraduates correlate significantly (p<0.05) with Parts 2 and 4 of the MST; Part 1 showed ceiling effects. Experiment 2 showed that the Nelson Reading Test scores of 24 ninth-grade students correlate significantly (p<0.005) with all parts of the MST. Experiment 3 showed a significant difference between means (p<0.005) on all parts of the MST for 26 proficient and 54 non-proficient high school readers. Results are consistent with the morphophonemic nature of English spelling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M.J. (1990).Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Baugh, A. C. & Cable, T. (1963).A history of the English language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology,Word 14: 150–177.
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection,Nature 301: 419–421.
Brady, S. A. & Shankweiler, D. P., Eds. (1991).Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Ass.
Brittain, M. M. (1970). Inflectional performance and early reading achievement,Reading Research Quarterly 6: 34–48.
Brown, R. (1973).A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P. & Richman, B. (1971).The American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Chomsky, N. (1964). Comments for project literacy meeting. Project Literacy Report No. 2. Reprinted in M. Lester (ed.),Readings in applied transformational grammar (pp. 1–8). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968).The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Derwing, B. L. & Baker, W. J. (1979). Recent research on the acquisition of English morphology. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (eds.),Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp. 209–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dever, R. B. & Gardner, W. I. (1970). Performance of normal and retarded boys on Berko's test of morphology,Language and Speech 13: 162–177.
de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P.A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech,Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2: 267–278.
Elbro, C. (1989).Morphological awareness in dyslexia. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, Institute for General and Applied Linguistics.
Freyd, P. & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21: 282–295.
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Camp, L., Blachman, B. & Werfman, M. (1980). Steps toward literacy: A linguistic approach. In P. Levinson & C. H. Sloan (eds.),Auditory processing and language: Clinical and research perspectives. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Liberman, I. Y., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. G. & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Orthography and the beginning reader. In J. Kavanaugh and R. Venezsky (eds.),Orthography, reading and dyslexia (pp. 137–154). Baltimore: University Park Press.
Mann, V. A. (1984). Longitudinal prediction and prevention of early reading difficulty,Annals of Dyslexia 34: 117–136.
Mann, V. A. & Brady, S. (1989). Reading disability: The role of language deficiencies,Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56: 811–816.
Marchand, H. (1969).The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. Munich: University of Alabama Press.
Myerson, R. (1976). A study of children's knowledge of certain word formation rules and the relationship of this knowledge to various forms of reading achievement. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. University Micro-films International, 76–30, 205.
Newfield, M. U. & Schlanger, B. B. (1968). The acquistion of morphology by normal and educable mentally retarded children,Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 11: 693–706.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading skill. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum Ass.
Read, C. & Ruyter, L. (1985). Reading and spelling skills in adults of low literacy,Remedial and Special Education 6: 43–52.
Templeton, S. & Scarborough-Franks, L. (1985). The spelling's the thing: Knowledge of derivational morphology in phonology and orthography among older students,Applied Psycholinguistics 6: 371–389.
Tyler, A. & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology,Journal of Memory and Language 28: 649–667.
Vogel, S. A. (1977). Morphological ability in normal and dyslexic children,Journal of Learning Disabilities 10: 41–49.
Wiig, E. H., Semel, E. M. & Crouse, M. A. (1973). The use of English morphology by high-risk and learning disabled children,Journal of Learning Disabilities 6: 457–465.
Wysocki, K. & Jenkins, J. R. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization,Reading Research Quarterly 22: 66–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahony, D.L. Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Read Writ 6, 19–44 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027276
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027276