Skip to main content
Log in

Marginal cost and second-best pricing for water services

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the pricing strategy of water services relative to marginal cost and second-best pricing rules, which is a principal concern of utility commissions. The water utility is viewed as a multiproduct firm providing residential and nonresidential services, and a translog multiproduct cost function is estimated for a cross section of U.S. water utilities. Marginal costs are estimated and combined with demand elasticities to simulate second-best prices for water services. Results show that while the existing price structure is quite different from the one suggested by marginal costs, it does not depart substantially from the second-best optimum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol, William J. and David F. Bradford (1970) ‘Optimal Departures from Marginal Cost Pricing’,American Economic Review 60, 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J., John C. Panzar, and Robert D. Willig (1982)Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Laurits R., Dale W. Jorgenson, and Lawrence J. Lau (1973) ‘Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers’,Review of Economics and Statistics,55, 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Robert M. and Richard G. Stevie (1981) ‘A Water Supply Cost Model Incorporating Spatial Variables’,Land Economics,57, 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W. Mark and Asghar Zardkoohi (1978) ‘A Test of the Property-Rights Theory of the Firm: Water Utilities in the United States’,Journal of Law and Economics,21, 395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Martin S. (1972) ‘Distributional Equity and the Optimal Structure of Public Prices’,American Economic Review,62, 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, Haynes,et al. (1978)Planning Water Supply: Cost Differentials and Plumbing Permits, EPA Report, Cincinnati, OH: US EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, James M. (1982) ‘The Welfare Implications of Externalities and Price Elasticities for Telecommunications Pricing’,Review of Economics and Statistics,69, 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huettner, David A. (1982) ‘Optimal Second Best Pricing of CATV Pole Attachments’,Southern Economic Journal,48, 996–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. Youn (1985)Economic Modelling of Water Supply: An Econometric Analysis of the Multiproduct Firm, EPA Report, Cincinnati, OH: US EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Patrick C. (1981) ‘Water Service: Regulation and Rate Reform’, Occasional Paper No. 4, National Regulatory Research Institute, Ohio State University, November.

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1927) ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation’,Economic Journal,37, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Frank A. (1986) ‘Assessing USA Postal Ratemaking: An Application of Ramsey Prices’,Journal of Industrial Economics,39, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, Ralph (1976) ‘Analyzing the Marginal Cost of Water Supply’,Land Economics,52, 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, Robert D. and Elizabeth E. Bailey (1979) ‘The Economic Gradient Method’,American Economic Review,69, 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, Robert D. and Elizabeth E. Bailey (1981) ‘Income-Distribution Concerns in Regulatory Policymaking’, in G. Fromm (ed.),Studies in Public Regulation, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research underlying this paper was supported by a cooperative agreement grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The author would like to thank Robert Clark, Richard Stevie, Haynes Goddard, John Wassom, Philip Fanara and Curt Grimm for helpful comments and suggestions, and Pat Pearson who prepared many drafts of this paper. Special thanks go to referees for their comments and suggestions to improve the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, H.Y. Marginal cost and second-best pricing for water services. Rev Ind Organ 10, 323–338 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027078

Key words

Navigation