Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The propensity to exit and innovation

  • Empirical Research On Industrial Organization: Two Papers And Comment
  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In offering an answer to the question, “Who exits and why?”, I introduce a model relating the decision to remain in, or exit from an industry, to conditions of demand and the underlying technology. In particular, I argue that two elements of technology are important — the role of scale economies in an industry and the extent to which the underlying technological information conditions can be characterized by either an entrepreneurial or a routinized regime. Based on the evidence from over 300 U.S. manufacturing industries, I conclude that the process of firm selection and industry evolution tends to conform either to the model of the revolving door, where the bulk of exiting businesses are new entrants, or else the metaphor of the forest, where incumbent establishments tend to be displaced by new entrants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1990)Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and Audretsch, David B. (1989) ‘Small-Firm Entry in U.S. Manufacturing’,Economica,56, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1988) ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’,American Economic Review,78, 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1987) ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size’,Review of Economics and Statistics,69, 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albach, Horst, Kurt Bock, and Thomas Warnke, (1984) ‘Wachstumskrisen von Unternehmen’,Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung,36, 779–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. (1962) ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in R.R. Nelson (ed.),The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 609–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. (1995) ‘Innovation, Growth and Survival’,International Journal of Industrial Organization,13.

  • Audretsch, David B. (1991) ‘New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime’,Review of Economics and Statistics,60, 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Talat Mahmood (1995) ‘New Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function’,Review of Economics and Statistics,71, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Hideki Yamawaki (1992) ‘Sub-Optimal Scale Plants and Compensating Factor Differentials in U.S. and Japanese Manufacturing’, in David B. Audretsch and John J. Siegfried (eds.),Empirical Studies in Industrial Organization: Essays in Honor of Leonard W. Weiss, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 161–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, John S. and David I. Rosenbaum (1990) ‘The Determinants of Entry and Exit Rates into U.S. Manufacturing Industries’,Review of Industrial Organization,5, 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller, C. W. F. (1989) ‘Exit from Declining Industries and the Case of Steel Castings’,Economic Journal,99, 949–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, Richard and Bruce D. Phillips (1985) ‘Uses and Limitations of USEEM/USELM Data’, Washington, D.C.: Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Charles, Judith Connor, Steven Heeringa, and John Jackson (1990) ‘Studying (Small) Business with the Michigan Employment Security Commission Longitudinal Data Base’,Small Business Economics,2, 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. Shelton and Bruce D. Phillips (1989) ‘Comparison Between Small Business Data Base (USEEM) and Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Employment Data: 1978–1986’,Small Business Economics,1, 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, John and Joachim Schwalbach (1990) ‘International Comparisons of Entry and Exit’, in Paul Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.),Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E., J. Khalilzadeh-Shirazi, and Michael E. Porter (1975) ‘Scale Economies in Statistical Analyses of Market Power’,Review of Economics and Statistics,57, 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, William S. and Thomas A. Wilson (1967) ‘Advertising, Market Structure, and Performance’,Review of Economics and Statistics,49, 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossutta, D. and M. Grillo (1986) ‘Excess Capacity, Sunk Costs and Collusion: A Non-Cooperative Bargaining Game’,International Journal of Industrial Organization,4, 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrenmöller, Alex (1987) Existenzgründungsstatistik:Nutzung amtlicher Datenquellen zur Erfassung des Gründungsgeschehens, Stuttgart: C.C. Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Timothy, Mark J. Roberts, and Larry Samuelson (1989) ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants’,Quarterly Journal of Economics,104, 671–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Timothy, Mark J. Roberts, and Larry Samuelson (1988) ‘Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries’,Rand Journal of Economics,19, 495–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David S. (1987a) ‘The Relationship Between Firm Growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries’,Journal of Industrial Economics,35, 567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David S. (1987b) ‘Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth’,Journal of Political Economy,95, 657–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Laurie Beth, and John J. Siegfried (1992) ‘Entry and Exit in United States Manufacturing Industries from 1977 to 1982’, in David B. Audretsch and John J. Siegfried (eds.),Empirical Studies in Industrial Organization: Essays in Honor of Leonard W. Weiss, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A. (1992)Market Dynamics and Entry, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A. (1991) ‘Entry and the Rate of Innovation’,Economic Innovation and New Technology,1, 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A. (1989) ‘The Interaction Between Domestic and Foreign Based Entrants’, in D. B. Audretsch, L. Sleuwaegen, and H. Yamawaki (eds.),The Convergence of International and Domestic Markets, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul and Joachim Schwalbach, (eds.), (1991)Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, Pankaj and Barry Nalebuff (1990) ‘The Devolution of Declining Industries’,Quarterly Journal of Economics,105, 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gort, Michael and Steven Klepper (1982) ‘Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations’,Economic Journal,92, September, 630–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwyn H. (1987) ‘The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector’,Journal of Industrial Economics,35, 583–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. (1980)Strategies for Declining Businesses, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, Boyan (1982) ‘Selection and Evolution of Industry’,Econometrica,50, 649–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, George G., E. Griffiths, R. Carter-Hill and Tsoung-Chao-Lee (1980)The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, Steven (1992) ‘Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle’, presented at the Conference on Market Processes and Corporate Networks, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, November.

  • Klepper, Steven and Elizabeth Graddy (1990), ‘The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure’,Rand Journal of Economics,21, 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. (1990) ‘Exit from Declining Industries: ‘Shakeout’ or ‘Stakeout’?’Rand Journal of Economics,84, 538–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred (1920)Principles of Economics, 8th ed., London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, José and Pedro Portugal (1994) ‘Life Duration of New Firms’,Journal of Industrial Economics 27, 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Dennis C. (1976) ‘Information, Mobility, and Profit’,Kyklos,29, 419–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter (1982)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter (1978) ‘Forces Generating and Limiting Concentration under Schumpeterian Competition’,Bell Journal of Economics,9, 524–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schary, Martha A. (1991) ‘The Probability of Exit’,Rand Journal of Economics,22, 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. and David Ross (1990)Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1911)Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus, 7th ed., 1987, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Joachim (1994) ‘Small-Firm Entry in Manufacturing Industries’,Small Business Economics,5, 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1975)Markets and Hierarchies: Antitrust Analysis and Implications, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney G. (1984) ‘Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes’,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,5, 287–320.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Berlin, Germany

    David B. Audretsch

Authors
  1. David B. Audretsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I am grateftful to Jianping Yang for his computational assistance, and to a referee of this journal for his helpful suggestions. In addition, Paul Geroski, Steve Klepper and Mark Roberts made important comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Any remaining errors and omissions are my responsibility.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Audretsch, D.B. The propensity to exit and innovation. Rev Ind Organ 10, 589–605 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026884

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026884

Key words

Search

Navigation