Skip to main content
Log in

Testing for market power in the U.S. motor carrier industry

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the 1980's, researchers noted a trend towards increased concentration in the general freight, less-than-truckload (LTL) portion of the U.S. motor carrier industry. The purpose of this study is to employ new empirical industrial organization techniques to determine whether the more concentrated, post-1980, LTL industry exerted monopoly pricing behavior and to compare the nature of pricing behavior before and after regulation reform.

The results suggest that the trend toward increased industry concentration does not imply anti-competitive performance. Also, the results indicate the presence of regulation-induced market power several years prior to regulation reform in 1980.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Trucking Associations (1989)1988 Motor Carrier Annual Report. Alexandria: American Trucking Associations, Financial and Operating Statistics Service, pp. 21–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Trucking Associations (1988)1987 Motor Carrier Annual Report. Alexandria: American Trucking Associations, Financial and Operating Statistics Service, pp. 22–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, E. (1982) ‘The Estimation of the Degree of Oligopoly Power’,Journal of Econometrics,19, 287–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T. (1989) ‘Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power’, in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds.,Handbook of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam: North-Holland, Vol. 2, pp. 1012–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. and M. Porter (1977) ‘From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition’,Quarterly Journal of Economics,92, 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, T. and J. Stowers (1991) ‘Effects of a Deregulated Environment on Motor Carriers: A systematic, Multi-Segment Analysis’,Transportation Journal,30, 4–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daughety, A. and F. Nelson (1988) ‘An Econometric Analysis of Changes in the Cost and Production Structure of the Trucking Industry, 1953–1982’,The Review of Economics and Statistics, Feb. pp. 67–75.

  • Enis, C. and E. Morash (1987) ‘Some Aspects of Motor Carrier Size, Concentration Tendencies, and Performance After Deregulation’,Akron Business and Economic Review,18, 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlaender, A. and R. Spady (1981)Freight Transportation Regulation: Equity, Efficiency, and Competition, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (1993)Econometrics, New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, C., T. Corsi, and J. Jarrell (1989) ‘U.S. Motor Carrier Cost Structure Under Deregulation’,Logistics and Transportation Review,25, 231–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interstate Commerce Commission (1945–1988)Annual Report to Congress.

  • Keeler, T. (1989) ‘Deregulation and Scale Economies in the U.S. Trucking Industry: An Econometric Extension of the Survivor Principle’,Journal of Law and Economics,32, 229–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. (1990) ‘Deregulation and Structural Change in the LTL Motor Freight Industry’,Transportation Journal,29, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, B. S. and L. Stanley (1987) ‘The Impact of Deregulation on the Production Structure of the Motor Carrier Industry’,Economic Inquiry, 26, 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, B. S. and H. Tanaka (1995) ‘An Econometric Analysis of Differences Between Motor Carriers: Implications for Market Structure’, Forthcoming,Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Autumn 1995.

  • McMullen, B. S. (1987) ‘The Impact of Regulation Reform on the U.S. Motor Carrier Industry: A Preliminary Examination’,Journal of Transportation Economics and Policy,121, 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. (1983) ‘A Study of Cartel Stability: The Joint Executive Committee, 1880–1886’,The Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakowski, J. (1988) ‘Marketing Economies and the Results of Trucking Deregulation in the Less-Than-Truckload Sector’,Transportation Journal, 27, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakowski, J. (1990) ‘The Market Failure in LTL Trucking: What Hath Deregulation Brought?’,Transportation Practitioners Journal, 56, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow, V. (1986) ‘Estimating Monopoly Behavior with Competitive Recycling: An Application to Alcoa’,Rand Journal of Economics,17, 389–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1958) ‘The Economies of Scale’,Journal of Law and Economics,1, 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, C. and V. Tremblay (Forthcoming, 1995) ‘Advertizing, Price, and Welfare: Evidence from the U.S. Brewing Industry’,Southern Economics Journal.

  • Tremblay, V. (1985) ‘Strategic Groups and the Demand for Beer’,The Journal of Industrial Economics,39, 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, V. (1993) ‘The Organizational Ecology of Strategic Groups in the American Brewing Industry: A Comment’,Industrial and Corporate Change,2, 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, C., T. Corsi, C. Grimm, and C. Evans (1990)The Economics Effects of Surface Freight Deregulation, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., R. Windle, C. Grimm, and T. Corsi (1993) ‘Reevaluating Returns to Scale in Transportation’, Working Paper, University of Maryland.

  • Ying, J. (1990) ‘The Inefficiency of Regulation a Competitive Industry: Productivity Gains in Trucking Following Reform’,The Review of Economics and Statistics,2, 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying, J. and T. Keeler (1991) ‘Pricing in a Deregulation Environment: The Motor Carrier Experience’,RAND Journal of Economics,22, 264–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Thomas Corsi for his contribution of the 1977 data used for this study. Also, we wish to thank Wesley Wilson for many helpful suggestions generously provided at various stages of this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nebesky, W., McMullen, B.S. & Lee, MK. Testing for market power in the U.S. motor carrier industry. Rev Ind Organ 10, 559–576 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026881

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026881

Key words

Navigation