Advertisement

Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 233–260 | Cite as

Quadrupole interactions at different probe ions implanted in nickel single crystals as observed by β-γ TDPAC

  • F. Namavar
  • M. Rots
  • J. Claes
  • R. Coussement
Article

Abstract

We discuss specific features of those angular correlation experiments sensitive to the nuclear polarization in the intermediate state and investigate, in view of radiation damage studies, the interest of using allowed as well as first-forbidden β-decay as the primary radiation in a TDPAC cascade. The description of the technique is illustrated by experiments on the samples\(^{129} \mathop {Te}\limits^ \to \underline {Ni} , ^{132} \mathop {Te}\limits^ \to \underline {Ni} , ^{111} \mathop {Ag}\limits^ \to \underline {Ni}\) and\(^{133} \mathop {Xe}\limits^ \to \underline {Ni}\) produced by ion implantation into nickel single crystals. These results clearly demonstrate the unique possibility to make the experiments selectively sensitive to those impurity atoms associated with lattice defects. Although the formulation is in all aspects general especially the cross terms (k1≠k2) in the angular correlation treatment are emphasized. In this way the presence of a combined hyperfine interaction, cumbersome for radiation damage studies, has been explored to gain sensitivity in impurity site characterization.

Keywords

Nickel Intermediate State Lattice Defect Hyperfine Interaction Impurity Atom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on hyperfine interactions, Madison, ed. R.S. Raghavan and D.E. Murnick (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), Hyp. Int. 4 (1978).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A.R. Miedema, J. Less-Common Met. 32 (1973) 117.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.R. Chelikowski, Phys. Rev. B19 (1979) 686.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. Behar and R.M. Steffen, Phys. Rev. C7 (1973) 788.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    H. Bertschat, H. Haas, F. Pleiter, E. Recknagel, E. Schlodder and B. Spellmeyer, Phys. Rev. B12 (1975) 1.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. de Waard, R.L. Cohen, S.R. Reintsema and S.A. Drentje, Phys. Rev. B10 (1974) 3760.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. Hohenemser, A.R. Arends, H. de Waard, H.G. Devare, F. Pleiter and S.A. Drentje, Hyp. Int. 3 (1977) 297.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    O. Echt, E. Recknagel, A. Weidinger and Th. Wichert, Z. Phys. B32 (1978) 59.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    L. Thomé and H. Bernas, Hyp. Int. 5 (1978) 361.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    P. Herzog, K. Krien, K. Freitag, M. Reuschenbach and H. Walitzki, Nucl. Phys. A337 (1980) 261.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Raghavan, E.N. Kaufmann, R.S. Raghavan, E.J. Ansaldo and R.A. Naumann, Phys. Rev. B13 (1976) 285.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on hyperfine interactions, Berlin 1980, Hyp. Int. 10 (1981) and references therein.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Wilkens, in Fundamental aspects of radiation damage in metals ed. M.T. Robinson and F.W. Young (US Dept. Commerce, Springfield, 1976), 98.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Rots, F. Namavar and R. Coussement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 1099.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    S.M. Harris, Nucl. Phys. 11 (1959) 387.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R.S. Raghavan, P. Raghavan and E.N. Kaufmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 111, 802 (E); R.S. Raghavan, P. Raghavan and E.N. Kaufmann, Phys. Rev. C12 (1975) 2022.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    R.R. Lewis, Phys. Rev. 163 (1967) 935.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    R.M. Steffen and K. Alder, in The electromagnetic interaction in nuclear spectroscopy, ed. Hamilton (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975) 583.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. Haroutunian, M. Meyer, I. Berkes, G. Marest and R. Coussement, Hyp. Int. 8 (1980) 41.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    H. Frauenfelder and R.M. Steffen, in Alpha-, beta- and gamma-ray spectroscopy, ed. K. Siegbahn (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965) 997.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Raghavan, R.S. Raghavan and E.N. Kaufmann, Phys. Lett. 48A (1974) 131.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    E. Matthias, B. Olsen and W. Schneider, Arkiv f. Fysik 24 (1963) 245.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    E. Matthias, W. Schneider and R.M. Steffen, Phys. Rev. 125 (1962) 261.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    S.A. Drentje and J. Ekster, J. Appl. Phys. 45 (1974) 3242.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    R. Sanders, Nucl. Phys. A138 (1969) 583.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    S.R. Reintsema, Ph.D. thesis, Groningen (1976).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    S.R. Reintsema, H. de Waard and S.A. Drentje, Hyp. Int. 2 (1976) 367.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    F. Namavar, M. Rots, R. Coussement, H. Ooms and J. Claes, Hyp. Int. 4 (1978) 716.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    A.C. Damask, G.J. Dienes and V.G. Weizer, Phys. Rev. 113 (1959) 781.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    V.S. Shirley and C.M. Lederer, in Table of isotopes, 7th ed. (Wiley, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    M. Rots, H. Ooms, J. Claes, F. Namavar and R. Coussement, Hyp. Int. 5 (1978) 391.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    D. Visser, L. Niesen, H. Postma, and H. de Waard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 (1978) 882.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    J. Claes, F. Namavar and M. Rots, Phys. Lett. 88A (1982) 303.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    H. Ooms, J. Claes, F. Namavar, H. van de Voorde and M. Rots, Nucl. Phys. A 321 (1979) 180.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    F. Pleiter and C. Hohenemser, Phys. Rev. B25 (1982) 106.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    F. Pleiter, Hyp. Int. 5 (1977) 109.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    A. Traversé, L. Thomé, L. Brossard and C. Cohen, Hyp. Int. 7 (1979) 333.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    M. Deicher, O. Echt, E. Recknagel and Th. Wichert, Hyp. Int. 10 (1981) 667.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    A.R. Arends, H. Hasper, C. Hohenemser, J.G. Mullen, G. van Opbroek and F. Pleiter, Hyp. Int. 10 (1981) 659.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer Scientific Publishing Company 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Namavar
    • 1
  • M. Rots
    • 1
  • J. Claes
    • 1
  • R. Coussement
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituut Kern- en StralingsfysikaKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations