Journal of Protein Chemistry

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 197–219 | Cite as

Reevaluation of the amino acid sequence of porcine follitropin

  • Hiromu Sugino
  • Koji Takio
  • Darrell N. Ward
Article

Abstract

We have reevaluated the sequence of porcine follicle-stimulating hormone (pFSH) with more recent protein-sequencing methodology. This has led to revision of the earlier proposed sequence. As with almost all reported gonadotropin α-subunits, NH2-terminal heterogeneity was found in the porcine FSH α-subunit (FSHα), starting with residue Phe (1), Asp (3), Gly (4), or Thr (7). In the β-subunit, there were found to be at least two molecular species, starting with residue Asn (1) (minor 20%) or Cys (3) (major 80%) as NH2-terminal and ending at residue Glu (108) as COOH-terminal. The net effect of the present revisions is to increase the homology of pFSHβ with other reported follitropin sequences. Apparent differences in the half-cystine placements in a previous proposal for pFSHβ compared with other species of FSH are no longer tenable. The half-cystine placements thus remain a constant structural feature throughout the gonadotropin hormones (choriogonadotropin, follitropin, and lutropin).

Key words

Porcine follitropin sequence structure beta subunit alpha subunit 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chu, W. P-C. (1972). M. S. thesis, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Texas, p. 61.Google Scholar
  2. Closset, J., Maghuin-Rogister, G., Hennen, G., and Strosberg, A. D. (1978).Eur. J. Biochem. 86, 115–120.Google Scholar
  3. Esch, F. S., Mason, A. J., Cooksey, K., Mercado, M., and Shimasaki, S. (1986).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 6618–6621.Google Scholar
  4. Fujiki, Y., Rathnam, P., and Saxena, B. B. (1978).J. Biol. Chem. 253, 5363–5368.Google Scholar
  5. Kato, Y. (1988).Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 55, 107–112.Google Scholar
  6. Maghuin-Rogister, G., Combarnous, Y., and Hennen, G. (1973).Eur. J. Biochem. 39, 255–263.Google Scholar
  7. Maghuin-Rogister, G., Hennen, G., Closset, J., and Kopeyan, C. (1976).Eur. J. Biochem. 61, 157–163.Google Scholar
  8. Masaki, T., Tanabe, M., Nakamura, K., and Soejima, M. (1981).Biochim. Biophy. Acta 666, 44–50.Google Scholar
  9. Maurer, R. A. (1987).Mol. Endocrinol. 1, 717–721.Google Scholar
  10. Pierce, J. G., and Parsons, T. F. (1981).Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 465–495.Google Scholar
  11. Sairam, M. R., Seidah, N. G., and Chretien, M. (1981).Biochem. J. 197, 541–552.Google Scholar
  12. Saxena, B. B., and Rathnam, P. (1976).J. Biol. Chem. 251, 993–1005.Google Scholar
  13. Shome, B., Parlow, A. F., Liu, W-K., Nahm, H. S., Wen, T., and Ward, D. N (1988).J. Protein Chem. 7, 325–339.Google Scholar
  14. Sugino, H., Bousfield, G. R., Moore, W. T. Jr., and Ward, D. N. (1987).J. Biol. Chem. 262, 8603–8609.Google Scholar
  15. Ward, D. N., Reichert, L. E. Jr., Liu, W-K., Nahm, H. S., Hsia, J., Lamkin, W. M., and Jones, N. S. (1973).Recent Prog. Hormone Res. 29, 533–561.Google Scholar
  16. Ward, D. N., Bousfield, G. R., Gordon, W. L., and Sugino, H. (1988). In:Microheterogeneity of Glycoprotein Hormones (Keel, B. A., and Grotjan, H. E. Jr., eds), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  17. Watkins, P. C., Eddy, R., Beck, A. K., Vellucci, V., Leverone, B., Tanzi, R. E., Gusella, J. F., and Shows, T. B. (1987).DNA 6, 205–212.Google Scholar
  18. Whitley, R. J., Keutmann, H. T., and Ryan, R. J. (1978).Endocrinology 102, 1874–1886.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiromu Sugino
    • 1
  • Koji Takio
    • 2
  • Darrell N. Ward
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyThe University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterHouston
  2. 2.Frontier Research ProgramInstitute of Physical and Chemical ResearchWako, SaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations