Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetry of information and contestability theory

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, contestability theory is examined under conditions of asymmetric information. Signals of economic profitability to potential entrants are the incumbent's list price and accounting rate of return. A disequilibrium analysis indicates that, while potential entry imposes a price discipline, incumbents can earn profits, although not indefinitely under stable conditions. Also, there may be wasteful entry even into industries where prices approximate the optimum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol, William J., Panzar, John C. and Willig, Robert D. (1982)Contestable Markets and the Theory Industry Structure, New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J., Panzar, John C. and Willig, Robert D. (1983) ‘Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure: Reply’,American Economic Review,73, 491–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J., Panzar, John C. and Willig, Robert D. (1986) ‘On the Theory of Perfectly Contestable Markets’, in Joseph E. Stiglitz and Frank Mathewson (eds.),New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 339–70. (Includes a summary of discussions of the paper by several scholars.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, Robert D. and Mahabir, Dhanayshar (1988) ‘Contestability: A Revisionist View’,Economica 55(2), 269–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. and Porter, M. E. (1977) ‘From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition’,Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 241–61.

  • DeGroot, Morris H. (1970)Optimal Statistical Decisions, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Franklin M. and McGowan, John J. (1983) ‘On the Misuse of Accounting Rates of Return to Infer Monopoly Profits’,American Economic Review 73(1), 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Joseph E., Jr. (1987) ‘Oligopolistic Entry Deterrence under Incomplete Information,’Rand Journal of Economics,18(2), 211–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. A. and Mayer, C. P. (1986) ‘On the Application of Accounting Rates of Return’,Economic Journal,96, 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, W. Bentley (1987) ‘Entry, Sunk Costs and Market Structure’,Canadian Journa of Economics,XX(1), 140–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, Robert and Shaanan, Joseph (1982) ‘Stochastic Dynamic Limit Pricing: An Empirical Test’,Review of Economics and Statistics,64, 413–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Steven A. and Mirman, Leonard J. (1983) ‘Equilibrium Pricing: The Effects of Private Information and Stochastic Demand’,Econometrica 51(4), 981–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mood, Alexander M. and Graybill, Franklin A. (1963)Introduction to the Theory of Statistics 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, Oskar (1963)On the Accuracy of Economic Observations, Princeton University Press.

  • Nalebuff, Barry and Scharfstein, David (1987) ‘Testing in Models of Asymmetric Information’,Review of Economic Studies,LIV, 265–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, Roy (1985) ‘Repeated Principal-Agent Games with Discounting’,Econometrica,53(5), 1173–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, James L. (1981) ‘Non-Aggressive Bidding Behavior and the “Winner's Curse”’,Economic Inquiry,XIX, 380–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George (1968)The Organization of Industry, Homewood, Ill.: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank Marcel Boyer, Mukesh Eswaran, John Galbraith, Barry Ma, Barbara Spencer, Vicky Zinde-Walsh and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Research on this paper was supported by the FCAR and the SSHRCC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cairns, R.D. Asymmetry of information and contestability theory. Rev Ind Organ 9, 99–107 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024222

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024222

Key words

Navigation