Skip to main content
Log in

Entry barriers, release behavior, and multi-product firms in the music recording industry

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article models the product release behavior of multi-product oligopolistic firms in the music recording industry. The model predicts that increasing industry concentration may result in an apportionment of the market among the existing firms, and fewer new product releases. Even though the minimum efficient scale of production in the industry is modest, the apportionment outcome is stabilized by the existence of industry entry barriers that raise the costs of potential competitors or entrants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black, M. and Greer, D. (1987) Concentration and Non-Price Competition in the Recording Industry,Review of Industrial Organization,3, 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, E. H. (1962)The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, (8th ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Chapple, S. and Garofulo, R. (1977)Rock ‘n’ Roll is Here to Pay: The History and Politics of the Music Industry. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1979) Payola in Radio and Television Broadcasting,The Journal of Law and Economics,22, 269–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannen, F. (1990)Hit Men: Power Brokers and Fast Money Inside the Music Business. Time Books: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B. C. and Lipsey, R. G. (1975) The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Reconsidered: Some New Developments in the Theory of Spatial Competition,Review of Economic Studies,42, 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (1988) The Principle of External Accountability in Competitive Markets, Unpublished Manuscript. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, D. (1984) Unpublished testimony, United States District Court, Central District of California, Federal Trade Commission vs. Warner Communications Inc.

  • Koenker, R. and Perry, M. (1981) Product Differentiation, Monopolistic Competition, and Public Policy,The Bell Journal of Economics,12, 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krattenmaker, T. and Salop, S. (1986) Competition and Cooperation in the Market for Exclusionary Rights,American Economic Review,76, 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1979)Variety, Equity, and Efficiency. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1987)Product Differentiation, The New Palgrave. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salop, S. and Scheffman, D. (1983) Raising Rivals' Costs,American Economic Review,73(2), 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1979) The Welfare Economics of Product Variety: An Application to the Ready-To-Eat Cereals Industry,Journal of Industrial Economics,28, 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. and Ross, D. (1990)Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1978) Entry Deterrence in the Ready-To-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry,Bell Journal of Economics,9, 305–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidak, J. G. and Kronemyer, D. E. (1987) The “New Payola” and the American Record Industry: Transactions Costs and Precautionary Ignorance in Contracts for Illegal Services,Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,10, 521–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. M. (1976) Product Differentiation and Welfare,American Economic Review,66, 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1964) A Theory of Oligopoly,Journal of Political Economy,72, 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1987), The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price,Journal of Economic Literature,25, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988)The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterson, M. (1984)Economic Theory of the Industry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to William G. Shepherd for his unstinting counsel and thoughtful comments. I also thank Herbert Gintis, Andrew Brimmer, Robert Gitter, Michael Podgursky, Dean Baker, and Linda Ewing for helpful comments on early drafts. Robert H. Nellson provided outstanding research assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, P.J. Entry barriers, release behavior, and multi-product firms in the music recording industry. Rev Ind Organ 9, 85–98 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024221

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024221

Key words

Navigation