Skip to main content
Log in

Joint oligopsony-oligopoly in the U.S. leaf tobacco market, 1924–39

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The leaf tobacco marketplace is highly organized. Prior to 1940, the few large tobacco companies controlled that organization explicitly. The question is whether this organization set oligopsonistic leaf prices or minimized production and transaction costs. A model of joint oligopsonyoligopoly shows that pricing of cigarettes and leaf tobacco was unified: oligopolistic cigarette pricing was sufficient to curtail both cigarette production and leaf purchases. The companies could just bid in the market for the leaf necessary for that cigarette production rate.Prima facie, the organization was not for oligopsony coordination. The implied econometric model of pricing fits observed behavior well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beese, D. H. (ed.) (1972)Tobacco Consumption in Various Countries, Research Paper 6, 3rd ed. London: Tobacco Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, Dennis W. (1978) ‘Market Behavior with Demand Uncertainty and Price Inflexibility’,American Economic Review,68, 571–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, Dennis W. (1979) ‘Contracts, Price Rigidity, and Market Equilibrium’,Journal of Political Economy,87, 1034–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, James L. (1987) ‘Organization and Control of the Leaf Tobacco Marketplace: Transaction Efficiency or Price Collusion?’ (Mimeographed).

  • Jackson, Elmo L. (1955)The Pricing of Cigarette Tobacco. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, William H. (1951)Price Policies in the Cigarette Industry. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, Julio and Saloner, Garth (1987) ‘The Relative Rigidity of Monopoly Pricing’,American Economic Review,77, 917–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, Richard B. (1950)The American Cigarette Industry. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1937)First Annual Report on Tobacco Statistics. Statistical Bulletin No. 58). Washington DC.

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1947, 1950)Annual Report on Tobacco Statistics. Washington DC.

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1984)Tobacco (Economic Research Service, Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 468). Washington DC.

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1975)Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970. Washington DC.

  • U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly (1966)Concentration Ratios in Manufacturing Industry. 89th Congress, 2nd Session. Washington DC.

  • Vernon, J., Rives, N. and Naylor, T. (1969) ‘An Econometric Model of the Tobacco Industry’,Review of Economics and Statistics,51, 149–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, William (1964)Microstatics. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1985) ‘Assessing Contract’,Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,1, 177–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. Y. (1979) ‘An Essay on Monopoly Power and Stable Price Policy’,American Economic Review,69, 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Malcolm Boyd, Dennis Carlton, John Garen, Stephen Karlson, Li Way Lee, An-loh Lin, Robert Miller, Stephen Spurr and the referee have given me thoughtful, perceptive and useful comments. I am pleased to acknowledge their involvement without implicating them in whatever errors remain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamilton, J.L. Joint oligopsony-oligopoly in the U.S. leaf tobacco market, 1924–39. Rev Ind Organ 9, 25–39 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024217

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024217

Key words

Navigation