Advertisement

Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 345–385 | Cite as

Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection

  • Folke ölander
  • John ThØgersen
Articles

Abstract

A number of the environmental problems threatening our habitat are to a greater or lesser extent caused by present consumer lifestyles. More sustainable lifestyles cannot be obtained without marked changes in consumer attitudes and consumer behaviour. To arrive at a synthesis of what is known, and of what needs to be known, about the determinants of consumer behaviour with an environmental impact, a frame of reference employing three main classes of variables is used: motivation, ability, and opportunity. Apart from surveying the research of others, illustrations are given from studies carried out by the group of researchers at the Aarhus School of Business to which the authors belong; this research has been mainly concerned with waste handling and recycling. In addition, various strategies for changing consumer behaviour in an environment-friendly direction are considered. Information, moral arguments, and economic incentives are discussed as instruments for change. In setting goals for change strategies, broad goals such as heightened psychic and communicative activity in matters of environmental concern ought to be considered as an alternative to the elicitation of very specific behaviours.

Keywords

Consumer Behaviour Specific Behaviour Economic Incentive Main Classis Change Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Zusammenfassung

Einsicht in das Vehalten von Konsumenten als Voraussetzung für den Schutz derZahlreiche Umweltprobleme, die unsere Lebensgrundlagen bedrohen, werden Umwelt. mehr oder weniger von den Lebensgewohnheiten der Konsumenten verursacht. Lebensstile, die demgegenüber eher als “nachhaltig” gelten können, könen nur durch deutliche Veränderungen im Bereich der Einstellungen und des Verhaltens von Konsumenten erzielt werden.

Der Beitrag liefert eine Zusammenschau dessen, was über die Einflu\faktoren auf das Verbraucherverhalten bekannt ist, soweit es Umweltwirkungen hat, und zeigt ebenso auf, was dazu noch nicht bekannt ist. Als Bezugsrahmen wählt er ein Modell, das Merkmale auf den drei Ebenen Motivation, Fähigkeit und Möglichkeit unterscheidet.

Au\er einem überblick über Forschungsergebnisse, die in der Literatur berichtet werden, schildert der Beitrag auch Ergebnisse der Forschergruppe an der Aarhus School of Business, zu der die beiden Autoren des Beitrages gehören. Diese Ergebnisse beziehen sich in erster Linie auf Abfallverhalten und Wiederverwertung.

Schlie\lich werden verschiedene Strategien zur Veränderung des Verbraucherverhaltens in umweltfreundlicher Richtung behandelt, vor allem Informationen, moralische Argumente und ökonomische Anreize. Bei der Formulierung von Zielen für solche Veränderungen sollten breite Zielsetzungen, wie z.B. gesteigerte psychische und kommunikative Aktivität in Umweltangelegenheiten, als Alternative zur Erreichung sehr spezifischen Verhaltens erwogen werden.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: J. Kühl & J. Beckmann (Eds.),Action-control: From cognition to behavior, pp. 11–39. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1988).Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research.Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous (1982). The public's opinion of recycling.Resource Recycling (May/June), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  6. Bagozzi, R. P. (1982). A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intentions, and behavior.Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 562–584.Google Scholar
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dabholkar, P. A. (1994). Consumer recycling goals and their effect on decisions to recycle: A means-end chain analysis. Psychology & Marketing,11(5).Google Scholar
  8. Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1990). Trying to consume.Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 127–140.Google Scholar
  9. Bech-Larsen, T. (1995).Danish consumer attitudes to the functional and environmental characteristics of food packaging. Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business, Department of Marketing. MAPP working paper.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, L. J., Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Darley, J. M. (1981). Relating attitudes to residential energy use.Environment and Behavior, 13, 590–609.Google Scholar
  11. Belk, R. W. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior.Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 157–164.Google Scholar
  12. Belk, R. W. (1985). Issues in the intention — behavior discrepancy. In: J. N. Sheth (Ed.),Research in consumer behavior, pp. 1–34. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  13. Berger, I. E., & Corbin, R. M. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors.Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11, 79–89.Google Scholar
  14. Black, J. S., Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 3–21.Google Scholar
  15. Borden, R. J. (1985). Personality and ecological concern. In: D. B. Gray (Ed.),Ecological beliefs and behaviors, pp. 87–122. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brehm, J. (1966).A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brisson, I. (1993). Packaging waste and the environment: Economics and policy.Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 8, 183–292.Google Scholar
  18. Clee, M. A., & Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Consumer behavior and psychological reactance.Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 389–405.Google Scholar
  19. Cook, S. W., & Berrenberg, J. L. (1981). Approaches to encouraging conservation behavior: A review and conceptual framework.Journal of Social Issues, 37(2), 73–107.Google Scholar
  20. Cote, J. A., McCullough, J., & Reilly, M. (1985). Effects of unexpected situations on behavior-intention differences: A garbology analysis.Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 188–194.Google Scholar
  21. de Kruijk, M. D., & van Raaij, W. F. (1991).Similarities and frequencies of behaviors in an environmental context. Paper presented at the IAREP/SASE Conference, Stockholm, June 16–19.Google Scholar
  22. De Young, R. (1985–86). Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation.Journal of Environmental Systems, 15, 281–292.Google Scholar
  23. De Young, R. (1988–89). Exploring the difference between recyclers and non-recyclers: The role of information.Journal of Environmental Systems, 18, 341–351.Google Scholar
  24. De Young, R. (1990). Recycling as appropriate behavior: A review of survey data from selected recycling education programs in Michigan.Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3, 253–266.Google Scholar
  25. De Young, R., & Kaplan, S. (1985–86). Conservation behavior and the structure of satisfactions.Journal of Environmental Systems, 15, 223–292.Google Scholar
  26. Dervin, P. G. (1980). Communication gaps and inequities: Moving towards a reconceptualization. In: B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.),Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 2, pp. 73–112. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  27. Devine, P. G., & Hirt, E. R. (1989). Message strategies for information campaigns: A social psychological analysis. In: C. T. Salmon (Ed.),Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change, pp. 229–259. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Dholakia, R. R., Dholakia, N., & Firat, A. F. (1983). From social psychology to political economy: A model of energy use behavior.Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 231–247.Google Scholar
  29. Dunlap, R. E., Grieneeks, J. K., & Rokeach, M. (1983). Human values and pro-environmental behavior. In: W. D. Conn (Ed.),Energy and material resources: Attitudes, values and public policy. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  30. Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980.Environment and Behavior, 25, 275–321.Google Scholar
  31. Eagly, A. H. (1992). Uneven progress: Social psychology and the study of attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 693–710.Google Scholar
  32. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993).The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  33. Elements for an international work programme on sustainable production and consumption (1995). Document representing the outcome of the Oslo Roundtable Conference on Sustainable Production and Consumption, hosted by the Norwegian Ministry of Environment, February 6–10, 1995.Google Scholar
  34. Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors.Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102–117.Google Scholar
  35. Environmental Resources Limited (1993).The best of both worlds: Sustainability and quality lifestyles in the 21st century. The Hague: Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer.Google Scholar
  36. Etzioni, A. (1988).The moral dimension. Toward a new economics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Facilities for a sustainable household (1995). The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, Directorate Industry-, Construction, Product-, and Consumer Affairs, Directorate of International Environmental Affairs. Workshop report.Google Scholar
  38. Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In: R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.),The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, pp. 204–243. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  40. Fjeldstad, Ø. (1994). A fair share — “Environmental space” as a tool for changing consumption patterns. In: W. M. Lafferty (Ed.),Steps toward sustainable consumption, pp. 3–15. Oslo: Prosjekt Alternativ Framtid.Google Scholar
  41. Frey, B. S. (1992). Pricing and regulating affect environmental ethics.Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 399–414.Google Scholar
  42. Frey, B. S. (1993). Motivation as a limit to pricing.Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 635–664.Google Scholar
  43. Geller, E. S. (1989). Applied behavioral analysis and social marketing: An integration for environmental preservation.Journal of Social Issues, 45(1), 17–36.Google Scholar
  44. Geller, E. S. (1991). If only more would actively care.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 24, 607–611.Google Scholar
  45. Geller, E. S. (1995). Actively caring for the environment. An integration of behaviorism and humanism.Environment and Behavior, 27, 184–195.Google Scholar
  46. Geller, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. R. (1982).Preserving the environment: New strategies for behaviour change, pp. 113–157. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  47. Gill, J. D., Crosby, L. A., & Taylor, J. R. (1986). Ecological concern, attitudes, and social norms in voting behavior.Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 537–554.Google Scholar
  48. Goldenhar, L. M., & Connell, C. M. (1992–93). Understanding and predicting recycling behavior: An application of the Theory of Reasoned Action.Journal of Environmental Systems, 22, 91–103.Google Scholar
  49. Gray, D. B. (1985).Ecological beliefs and behaviors: Assessment and change. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  50. GrØnmo, S., & ölander, F. (1991). Consumer power: Enabling and limiting factors.Journal of Consumer Policy, 14, 141–169.Google Scholar
  51. Grunert, K. G., & Grunert, S. C. (1993).A comparative analysis of the influence of economic culture on East and West German consumers' subjective product meanings. Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business, Department of Marketing. MAPP working paper no. 14.Google Scholar
  52. Grunert, S. C., & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods.Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 39–62.Google Scholar
  53. Hardin, G. (1968). Tragedy of the commons.Science, 162, 1243–1248.Google Scholar
  54. Hille, J. (1995). Environmental shares and sustainable consumption. In: E. StØ (Ed.),Sustainable consumption, pp. 45–89. Oslo: National Institute for Consumer Research (SIFO).Google Scholar
  55. Hirschman, A. (1970).Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior. Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program.Environment and Behavior, 23, 195–220.Google Scholar
  57. Humphrey, C. R., Bord, R. J., Hammond, M. M., & Mann, S. M. (1977). Attitudes and conditions for cooperation in a recycling program.Environment and Behavior, 9, 107–124.Google Scholar
  58. Hutton, R. B., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Consumer response to a five-year campaign to combat air pollution.Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10, 242–256.Google Scholar
  59. IOCU (1993a).Beyond the year 2000. The transition to sustainable consumption. A policy document on environmental issues. London: Consumers International.Google Scholar
  60. IOCU (1993b).Sustainable consumption. Proceedings of the IOCU/Consumentenbond Conference and Seminar, 27–29 April, 1993, The Hague. London: Consumers International.Google Scholar
  61. Jensen, M. (1994).Tyske forbrugeres evaluering of fØdevareemballage (German consumers' assessment of food packaging). Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business, Department of Marketing. Master's thesis.Google Scholar
  62. Johansson, M. (1993).Et adf∄rdsteoretisk grundlag for regulering af husholdningernes affaldsbortskaffelse (A behavioural science framework for regulating household waste separation). Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business, Department of Marketing. Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  63. Jones, R. E. (1990). Understanding paper recycling in an institutionally supportive setting: An application of the theory of reasoned action.Journal of Environmental Systems, 19, 307–321.Google Scholar
  64. Kattzev, R. D., & Pardini, A. U. (1987). The comparative effectiveness of reward and commitment approaches in motivating community recycling.Journal of Environmental Systems, 17, 93–113.Google Scholar
  65. Kempton, W., Darley, J. M., & Stern, P. C. (1992). Psychological research for the new energy problems. Strategies and opportunities.American Psychologist, 47, 1213–1223.Google Scholar
  66. Kinnear, T., Taylor, J. R., & Ahmed, S. (1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: Who are they?Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 20–24.Google Scholar
  67. Kok, G., & Siero, S. (1985). Tin recycling: Awareness, comprehension, attitude, intention and behavior.Journal of Economic Psychology, 6, 157–173.Google Scholar
  68. Lee, Y.-J., & De Young, R. (1993). Intrinsic satisfaction derived from office recycling behavior: A case study in Taiwan.Social Indicators Research, 31, 63–76.Google Scholar
  69. Leonard-Barton, D. (1981). Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation.Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 243–252.Google Scholar
  70. Lipsey, M. W. (1980).The structure of ecologically responsible behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI, May.Google Scholar
  71. Lynn, M., & Oldenquist, A. (1986). Egoistic and nonegoistic motives in social dilemmas.American Psychologist, 41, 529–534.Google Scholar
  72. Macey, S. M., & Brown, M. A. (1983). The role of past experience in repetitive household b ehavior.Environment and Behavior, 15, 123–141.Google Scholar
  73. McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (1993). A structural equation analysis of the relationships of personal values, attitudes and beliefs about recycling, and the recycling of solid waste products.Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 641–646.Google Scholar
  74. McClelland, L., & Canter, R. J. (1981). Psychological research on energy conservation: Context, approaches, methods. In: A. Baum & J. E. Singer (Eds.),Advances in environmental psychology, Vol. 3. Energy conservation: Psychological perspectives. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  75. McDougall, G. H. G., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1979). Consumer energy conservation: A framework for policy research.Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 272–276.Google Scholar
  76. Moisander, J., & Uusitalo, L. (1994).Attitude-behavior inconsistency: Limitations of the reasoned action approach in predicting behavior from proenvironmental attitudes. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Colloquium of the International Association for Research in Economic Psychology, Rotterdam, July 10–13.Google Scholar
  77. Neuman, K. (1986). Personal values and commitment to energy conservation.Environment and Behavior, 18, 53–74.Google Scholar
  78. Nowak, K., Julander, C.-R., Lundberg, D., & ölander, F. (1971). Alternativa mål för samhällsinformation. I. Den nuvarande informationsteknikens innebörd och tillämpning (Alternative goals for public information. I. The essence and application of present techniques for the spreading of information).Sociologisk Forskning, No. 4, 185–196.Google Scholar
  79. Nowak, K., Julander, C.-R., Lundberg, D., & ölander, F. (1972). Alternativa mål för samhällsinformation. II. Problemmedvetande och aktivitet som samhällsinformationens mål (Alternative goals for public information. II. Problem awareness and activity as the goal of public information).Sociologisk Forskning, No. 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
  80. OECD (1989).Economic instruments for environmental protection. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  81. OECD (1991).Environmental indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  82. Oskamp, S., Harrington, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M., & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior.Environment and Behavior, 23, 494–519.Google Scholar
  83. Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1992). Market-based approaches to solid waste management.Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 8, 63–90.Google Scholar
  84. Pelton, L. E., Strutton, D., Barnes Jr., J. H., & True, S. L. (1993). The relationship among referents, opportunity, rewards, and punishments in consumer attitudes toward recycling: A structural equation approach.Journal of Macromarketing (Spring), 60–74.Google Scholar
  85. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1993).Consumer behavior and marketing strategy. Third ed. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  86. Pickett, G. M., Kangun, N., & Grove, S. J. (1993). Is there a general conserving consumer?Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, 234–243.Google Scholar
  87. Pieters, R. (1988). Attitude-behavior relationships. In: W. F. van Raaij, G. van Veldhoven, & K.-E. Wärneryd (Eds.),Handbook of economic psychology, pp. 144–204. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  88. Pieters, R. (1989).Attitudes and behavior in a source-separation program: A garbology approach. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  89. Pieters, R. G. M. (1991). Changing garbage disposal patterns of consumers: Motivation, ability, and performance.Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10, 59–76.Google Scholar
  90. Platt, J. (1973). Social traps.American Psychologist, 28, 641–651.Google Scholar
  91. Pomazal, R. J., & Jaccard, J. J. (1976). An informational approach to altruistic behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 317–326.Google Scholar
  92. Reynolds, T. J. (1985). Implications for value research: A macro vs. micro perspective.Psychology & Marketing, 2, 297–305.Google Scholar
  93. Ritchie, J. R. B., & McDougall, G. H. G. (1985). Designing and marketing consumer energy conservation policies and programs: Implications from a decade of research.Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 4, 14–32.Google Scholar
  94. Ronis, D. L., Yates, J. F., & Kirscht, J. P. (1989). Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. In: A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. Greenwald (Eds.),Attitude structure and function, pp. 213–239. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  95. Salmon, C. T. (1989). Campaigns for social “improvements”: An overview of values, rationales, and impacts. In: C. T. Salmon (Ed.),Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change, pp. 19–53. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  96. Sarver, V. T., Jr. (1983). Ajzen and Fishbein's “theory of reasoned action”: A critical assessment.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 13, 155–163.Google Scholar
  97. Schwartz, S. H. (1970). Moral decision making and behavior. In: J. Macauley & L. Berkowitz (Eds.),Altruism and helping behavior, pp. 127–141. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  98. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influence on altruism. In: L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 221–279. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  99. Seligman, C., Hall, D., & Finegan, J. (1983). Predicting home energy consumption: An application of the Fishbein-Ajzen model.Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 647–651.Google Scholar
  100. Sjödén, P.-O. (1992). Ny livsstil... på livstid? Hinder och möjligheter för beteendeförändring och vidmakthållande (New life style... for a life time? Obstacles and opportunities for behaviour change and preservation). In: L. J. Lundgren (Ed.),Livsstil och miljö, pp. 102–124. Stockholm: Statens Naturvårdsverk.Google Scholar
  101. Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: Assessing the role of identification with “green consumerism.”Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 388–399.Google Scholar
  102. Stern, P. C. (1976). Effect of incentives and education on resource conservation decisions in a simulated commons dilemma.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1285–1292.Google Scholar
  103. Stern, P. C. (1992a). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change.Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269–302.Google Scholar
  104. Stern, P. C. (1992b). What psychology knows about energy conservation.American Psychologist, 47, 1224–1232.Google Scholar
  105. Stern, P. C., & Gardner, G. T. (1981). Psychological research and energy policy.American Psychologist, 36, 329–342.Google Scholar
  106. Stern, P. C., & Kirkpatrick, E. M. (1977). Energy behavior: Conservation without coercion.Environment, 10, 10–15.Google Scholar
  107. Stern, P. C., & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In: D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.),Handbook of environmental psychology, pp. 1043–1088. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  108. StØ, E. (Ed.) (1995).Sustainable consumption. Oslo: National Institute for Consumer Research (SIFO).Google Scholar
  109. ThØgersen, J. (1990).A behavioural science framework for source-separation systems for household waste. Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business, Department of Marketing. Working paper No. 20.Google Scholar
  110. ThØgersen, J. (1994a). A model of recycling behaviour. With evidence from Danish source separation programmes.International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 145–163.Google Scholar
  111. ThØgersen, J. (1994b). Monetary incentives and environmental concern. Effects of a differentiated garbage fee.Journal of Consumer Policy, 17, 407–442.Google Scholar
  112. ThØgersen, J. (1995a).The demand for environmentally friendly packaging in Germany. Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business, Department of Marketing. MAPP working paper, no. 31.Google Scholar
  113. ThØgersen, J. (1995b). Recycling as moral behaviour. In: E. StØ (Ed.),Sustainable consumption, pp. 375–405. Oslo: National Institute for Consumer Research (SIFO).Google Scholar
  114. ThØgersen, J., & Bech-Larsen, T. (1993).Emballagens miljØbelastning. En mål-middel-analyse af forbrugernes problemopfattelse og lØsningsstrategier (Environmental hardship caused by packaging. An ends-means analysis of consumers' problem cognizance and solution strategies). Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business, Department of Marketing. MAPP projektrapport.Google Scholar
  115. Triandis, H. C. (1977).Interpersonal behavior. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  116. Triandis, H. C. (1980). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In: M. M. Page (Ed.).Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1979, pp. 195–259. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  117. Uusitalo, L. (1990). Are environmental attitudes and behaviour inconsistent? Findings from a Finnish study.Scandinavian Political Studies, 13, 211–226.Google Scholar
  118. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior.Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.Google Scholar
  119. Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Moral norms and environmental behavior: An application of Schwartz's norm-activation model to yard burning.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 174–188.Google Scholar
  120. Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence.Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181–197.Google Scholar
  121. van Ophem, J. A. C. (1992). Household waste activities and economics: Separation of current solid household waste. In: W. J. M. Heijman & J. J. Krabbe (Eds.),Issues of environmental economic policy, pp. 29–47. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
  122. Verhallen, T. M. M., & Pieters, R. G. M. (1984). Attitude theory and behavioral costs.Journal of Economic Psychology, 5, 223–249.Google Scholar
  123. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A., & van Knippenberg, C. (1994). Antecedents of travel mode choice.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 285–300.Google Scholar
  124. Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers.Environment and Behavior, 22, 55–73.Google Scholar
  125. Weigel, R. H. (1985). Attitudes and actions in research on environmental problems.Journal of Resource Management and Technology, 14, 123–129.Google Scholar
  126. Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitude versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral response.Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 41–78.Google Scholar
  127. Wiener, J. L., & Doescher, T. A. (1991). A framework for promoting cooperation.Journal of Marketing, 55(2), 38–47.Google Scholar
  128. Zaltman, G. (1974). Strategies for diffusing innovations. In: J. N. Sheth & P. L. Wright (Eds.),Marketing analysis for societal problems, pp. 78–100. Urbana-Champaign, IL: The University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  129. Zikmund, W. G., & Stanton, W. J. (1971). Recycling solid wastes: A channels-of-distribution problem.Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 34–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Folke ölander
    • 1
  • John ThØgersen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MarketingThe Aarhus School of BusinessAarhus VDenmark

Personalised recommendations