Further studies of a zinc-air cell employing a packed bed anode part I: Discharge
- 148 Downloads
The zinc-air cell employing a packed bed anode, described previously , has been the subject of further investigation. A 76 cm2 (air electrode area) laboratory cell has been used to determine cell performance under a varying load corresponding to the Simplified Federal Urban Driving Schedule. The results were then used as a basis for the conceptual design of a 55 kW (peak power) battery. Projected specific energy of the battery was 110 Wh kg−1 and projected specific power 97 W kg−1 under SFUDS discharge. These values were increased to 228 Wh kg−1 and 97 W kg−1 when capacity is important and to 101 Wh kg−1 and 150 W kg−1 when power is important, based on the results of discharge experiments at 45°C. Preliminary experiments were carried out to determine the long term stability of the air electrode in this application, to measure self discharge of the zinc and to test the practicality of mechanically recharging the cell.
KeywordsZinc Physical Chemistry Specific Energy Peak Power Conceptual Design
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- P. N. Ross, ‘Zinc electrode and rechargeable zinc-air battery’, U.S. patent 4 842 963 (27 June 1989).Google Scholar
- J. W. Evans and G. Savaskan,J. Appl. Electrochem. 21 (1991) 105–110.Google Scholar
- Idem, ‘Battery using a metal particle bed electrode’, U.S. Patent 5 006 424 (9 April 1991).Google Scholar
- A Simplified Version of the Federal Urban Driving Schedule for Electric Vehicle Battery Testing, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, DOE/ID-10146 (August 1988).Google Scholar
- A. Appleby, J. Pompon and M. Jaquier,in Proceedings of the 10th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference Newark, Delaware (1975) pp. 811–6.Google Scholar
- P. C. Foller,J. Appl. Electrochem. 16 (1986) 527–43.Google Scholar
- H. B. Sierra Alcázar and P. D. Nguyen,in Proceedings of the 22nd Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Philadelphia PA, AIAA (Washington, 1987) Vol, 2, pp. 1033–38.Google Scholar