Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 361–369 | Cite as

A little bit more evidence of lottery regressivity: The Kansas State Lottery

  • Pamela Mobilia


This paper examines the existence of regressivity at the Kansas State Lottery using county level data. The classic “t-test” is used to test if the mean per capita bet in classes, defined as being below or above the median state income, are the same. The results show that the means of the per capita bets are not statistically different. Another test directly tests regressivity using the mean of bets expressed as a percentage of income. The results show that lower income counties bet more as a percentage of income. The second test also defines classes as being below or above the median educational level, labor force participation rate, employment rate, unemployment rate, population density, percentage white and the population size. The results show that Kansas runs a regressive lottery.


Population Size Population Density Median State Labor Force Educational Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brinner, R.E. & Clotfelter, C.T. (1975). An economic appraisal of state lotteries.National Tax Journal, 23, 395–404.Google Scholar
  2. Clotfelter, C.T. & Cook, P.J. (1989).Selling hope: state lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Grossman, M. (1973). Unemployment and consumption: note.American Economic Review, 63, 208–213.Google Scholar
  4. Kansas Lottery (1988).Annual Report 1988. Topeka, KS: The Kansas Lottery.Google Scholar
  5. Newbold, P. (1984).Statistics for business and economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. New York Times (1990). From the first meeting to the final penalty (The Pete Rose case).The New York Times, 8/25/89, page A23(L) col. 1.Google Scholar
  7. Passell, P. (1989). Lotto is financed by the poor and won by the states,The New York Times, 5/21/89, page E6(n) col 1.Google Scholar
  8. Satterthwaite, F.W. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110–114.Google Scholar
  9. Spiro, M.H. (1974). On the incidence of the Pennsylvania lottery.National Tax Journal, 27, 57–61.Google Scholar
  10. Suits, D.B. (1977). Gambling taxes: Regressivity and revenue potential.National Tax Journal, 30, 19–35.Google Scholar
  11. U.S. Department of Commerce. (1988).Area Resource File, Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
  12. Vescey, G. (1989). The owner who paid a gambler,The New York Times, 7/19/90, page B11(N) col 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela Mobilia
    • 1
  1. 1.Brooklyn College and National Bureau of Economic ResearchUSA

Personalised recommendations