Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 9, pp 1289–1295 | Cite as

Olfactory aposematism

Association of food toxicity with naturally occurring odor
  • Scott Camazine


Visual and acoustic cues may serve as aposematic signals that warn predators of poisonous foods. Olfactory aposematism, the use of innocuous odors as warning signals for toxic foods, is another possible means of alerting an animal that a potential food item is unpalatable. Although it has been suggested that olfactory aposematism might be the principle mode of warning utilized by plants in their defense against herbivores, experimental evidence is lacking. This study demonstrates that the opossum,Didelphis virginiana, can utilize an innocuous volatile compound found naturally in a mushroom as a warning signal for a delayed illness caused by mushroom toxin. This supports the contention that characteristic odors of toxic plants may serve a warning function, protecting herbivores from being poisoned and plants from being consumed.

Key words

Aposematism olfactory odor opossum Didelphis virginiana 1-octen-3-ol mushroom volatile toxicity bioassay 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brower, L.P. 1969. Ecological chemistry.Sci. Am. 220(2):22–29Google Scholar
  2. Brower, L.P., andBrower, J.V.Z. 1962. Experimental studies of mimicry. 6. The reaction of toads (Bufo terrestris) to honeybees (Apis mellifera) and their dronefly mimics (Eristalis vinetorum).Am. Nat. 96:297–307.Google Scholar
  3. Brower, L.P., andBrower, J.V.Z. 1965. Experimental studies of mimicry. 8. Further investigations of honeybees (Apis mellifera) and their dronefly mimics (Eristalis spp).Am. Nat. 99:173–187.Google Scholar
  4. Brower, L.P., Brower, J.V.Z., andWestcott, P.W. 1960. Experimental studies of mimicry. 5. The reactions of toads (Bufo terrestris) to bumblebees (Bombus americanorum) and their robberfly mimics (Mallophora bomboides), with a discussion of aggressive mimicry.Am. Nat. 94:343–355.Google Scholar
  5. Camazine, S. 1983. Mushroom chemical defense: Food aversion learning induced by the hallucinogenic toxin, muscimol.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1473–1481.Google Scholar
  6. Camazine, S., Resch, J.F., Eisner, T., andMeinwald, J. 1983. Mushroom chemical defense: Pungent sesquiterpenoid dialdehyde antifeedant to opossum.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1439–1447.Google Scholar
  7. Cott, H.B. 1940. Protective Coloration in Animals. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  8. Dunning, D.C., andRoeder, K.D. 1965. Moth sounds and the insect-catching behavior of bats.Science 147:173–174.Google Scholar
  9. Eisner, T., andGrant, R.P. 1981. Toxicity, odor aversion, odor aversion, and “olfactory apose-matism.”Science 213:476.Google Scholar
  10. Fogel, R., andTrappe, J.M. 1978. Fungus consumption (mycophagy) by small animals.Northwest Sci. 52:1–31.Google Scholar
  11. Fullard, J.H. 1977. Phenology of sound-producing arctiid moths and the activity of insectivorous bats.Nature 267:42–43.Google Scholar
  12. Gamzu, E. 1977. The multifaceted nature of taste-aversion-inducing agents: Is there a single common factor?, pp. 477–509,in L.M. Barker, M.R. Best, and M. Domjan (eds.). Learning Mechanisms in Food Selection. Baylor University Press, Texas.Google Scholar
  13. Garcia, J., andRusiniak, K.W. 1980. What the nose learns from the mouth, pp. 141–156,in D. Müller-Schwarze and R.M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals. Plenum Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Moulton, D.G. 1973. The use of animals in olfactory research, pp. 143–223,in W.I. Gay (ed.). Methods of Animal Experimentation, Vol. IV, Environment and the Special Senses. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Palmerino, C.C., Rusiniak, K.W., andGarcia, J. 1980. Flavor-illness aversions: The peculiar roles of odor and taste in the memory for poison.Science 208:753–755.Google Scholar
  16. Pyysalo, H. 1976. Identification of volatile compounds in seven edible fresh mushrooms.Acta Chem. Scand. B 30:235–244.Google Scholar
  17. Rothschild, M. 1961. Defensive odors and Mullerian mimicry among insects.Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. London 113:101–121.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, S.M. 1977. Coral-snake pattern recognition and stimulus generalization by naive great kiskadees (Aves: Tyrannidae).Nature 265:535–536.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Camazine
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biological SciencesCornell UniversityIthaca

Personalised recommendations