The effect of job title status on job evaluation ratings was examined. Eighty-six personnel management students used the Factor Evaluation System (FES) to evaluate two job descriptions. One of three different forms of a secretary and accountant job description, differing only on the status of the job title, was randomly assigned to the subjects. The results showed that job title status significantly influenced job evaluation ratings for both the accounting and secretarial jobs. The implications of these findings are discussed and recommendations are made to avoid the contamination of job evaluation results by job title status.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Baron, J. N., & Bielby, W. T. (1986). The proliferation of job titles in organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 561–586.
Benson, P. G., & Hornsby, J. S. (1988). The politics of pay: The use of influence tactics in job evaluation committees.Group and Organization Studies, forthcoming.
Bernardin, H. N., & Beatty, W. W. (1984).Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston, MA: Kent Publishing.
Bogart, A. (1969). Dealing with wage and salary compression.Compensation Review, 1, 6–14.
Cleavelin, C. C. (1959). What's in a job titleThe Management Review, 48, 56–57.
DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 360–396.
Feldman, J. M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127–148.
Fulk, J., Brief, A. P., & Barr, S. H. (1985). Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations.Journal of Business Research, 13, 301–313.
Giese, S. L. (1985, December).Comparison of a point method job evaluation instrument using student raters and professional raters. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Akron, OH.
Grams, R., & Schwab, D. P. (1985). An investigation of systematic gender-related error in job evaluation.Academy of Management Journal, 28, 279–290.
Hills, F. S. (1987).Compensation decision making. Chicago: Dryden Press.
Hornsby, J. S., Benson, P. G., & Smith, B. N. (1987). An investigation of gender bias in the job evaluation process.Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 150–159.
Johnson, G. (1982). Easing the squeeze on the salary ladder.Industry Week, Feb. 22, 65–68.
Keppel, G. (1982).Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook, Second Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Landy, F. J. & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating.Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107.
Landy, F. J. & Farr, J. L. (1983).The measurement of work performance: Methods, theory, and applications. New York: Academic Press.
Lowe, R. (1985, March). An experimental study of bias in job evaluation. Paper presented at the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta.
Schwab, D. P. (1985). Job evaluation research and research needs. In H. I. Hartmann (Ed.), Comparable worth: New directions for research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Schwab, D. P., & Grams, R. (1983, November). A study of job evaluation practice among compensation specialists: A summary of findings. Unpublished report to the American Compensation Association.
Schwab, D. P., & Grams, R. (1985). Sex-related errors in job evaluation: A “real-world” test.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 533–539.
Smith, B. N., Benson, P. G., Hornsby, J. S., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1987). “A rose by any other name ...”: The impact of job titles on job evaluation results. Paper presented at the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta.
Treiman, D. J. (1979).Job evaluation: an analytical review. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Science.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science, 185, 1124–1131.
U. S. Civil Service Commission (1977).Instructions for the Factor Evaluation System. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, B.N., Hornsby, J.S., Benson, P.G. et al. What is in a name: The impact of job titles on job evaluation results. J Bus Psychol 3, 341–351 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023051
- Social Psychology
- Evaluation System
- Evaluation Result
- Social Issue
- Factor Evaluation