Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applicant perceptions of simulated behavior description interviews

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavior description interviews (Janz, 1982) were compared to standard interview techniques in the context of a recruiting interview. Positive or negative recruiter affect was combined with the two types of interview techniques to determine if positive recruiter affect can reduce the hypothesized stress induced by behavior description interviews. Simulated recruiting interviews were presented using videotaped interviews where different types of questions were asked (behavior description vs. standard) and recruiter affect was manipulated through eye contact, smiling, and other non-verbal communication. Sixty-seven undergraduates were randomly assigned to view one of the four simulated interviews. Subjects' perceptions of the recruiter and interview were collected on a post-experimental questionnaire. Multivariate analysis of variance indicated main effects for both type of interview questions (F=2.69, p<.05) and recruiter affect (F=9.25, p<.001). Implications for recruiting interviews were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dunnette, M. D., & Borman, W. C. (1979). Personnel selection and classification systems.Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 477–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, D. C., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. G. (1986). Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater, and type of job on interview decisions.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (1980). Problems in the employment interview. In K. M. Rowland, M. London, G. R. Ferris, J. L. Sherman (Eds.),Current Issues in Personnel Management. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (1983). The recruitment interview. In K. M. Rowland, G. R. Ferris, J. L. Sherman (Eds.)Current Issues in Personnel Management. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakel, M. D. (1981). Employment Interview. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.),Personnel Management. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W. L. (1963).Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imada, A. S., & Hakel, M. D. (1977). Influence of nonverbal communication and rater proximity on impressions and decisions in simulated employment interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 295–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz, T., Hellervik, L., & Gilmore, D. C. (1986).Behavior description interviewing: New, accurate, cost effective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, E. C., Brown, S. H., & Hamstra, B. W. (1980). Selection interviewing in the life insurance industry: An update of research and practice.Personnel Psychology, 33, 725–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D., & Sincoff, M. (1978). Favorable impression characteristics of the recruitment interview.Personnel Psychology, 31, 495–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, B. L. (1973). Attitudes toward invasion of privacy in the personnel selection process and job applicant demographic and personality correlates.Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L., Heneman, H. G., & Schwab, D. P. (1980). Individual reactions to organizational recruiting: A review.Personnel Psychology, 33, 529–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L., & Miller, H. E. (1983). Recruiter and job influences on candidates for employment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decisions: Implications for the employment interview.Personnel Psychology, 29, 70–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 28223, NC

    David C. Gilmore

Authors
  1. David C. Gilmore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author would like to thank Michael O'Connor, Liebe Clayton, Michael Moody, and Patrick Gann for their assistance in the conduct of this research.

This work was supported in part by funds from the Foundation of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte and from the State of North Carolina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilmore, D.C. Applicant perceptions of simulated behavior description interviews. J Bus Psychol 3, 279–288 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023046

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023046

Keywords

Search

Navigation