Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 335–351 | Cite as

Effect of qualitative and quantitative variation in allelochemicals on a generalist insect: Iridoid glycosides and the southern armyworm

  • Gillian M. Puttick
  • M. Deane Bowers
Article

Abstract

The behavioral and physiological effects of plant allelochemicals have been difficult to demonstrate; it is not often clear whether the compounds are deterrent, toxic, or both. In this study, we compared the qualitative and quantitative effects of several iridoid glycosides on a generalist lepidopteran herbivore,Spodoptera eridania (Noctuidae). Larval growth and survivorship and larval preference or avoidance were measured on artificial diets containing different iridoid glycosides at different concentrations. We also tested the toxicity/deterrence of these compounds. We found that iridoid glycosides retarded larval growth significantly at relatively low concentrations and that they were usually avoided in preference tests. The toxicity/ deterrence test did not always reflect the results of these other tests. The merits of using a variety of methods for determining deterrence and/or toxicity of plant allelochemicals are discussed.

Key words

Iridoid glycosides Spodoptera eridania Lepidoptera Noctuidae allelochemical variation toxicity/deterrence plant-insect interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmad, S. 1982. Roles of mixed-function oxidases in insect herbivory. Proceedings, 5th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  2. Berenbaum, M. 1978. Toxicity of a furanocoumarin to armyworms: A case of biosynthetic escape from insect herbivores.Science 201:532–534.Google Scholar
  3. Bernays, E.A., andDeluca, C. 1981. Insect anti-feedant properties of an iridoid glycoside: Ipolamiide.Experientia 37:1289–1290.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, P.A., Feeny, P., Contardo, L., andRobson, D.S. 1978. Allylglucosinolate and herbivorous caterpillars: a contrast in toxicity and tolerance.Science 200:1296–1298.Google Scholar
  5. Bobbitt, J.M., Schmid, H., andAfrica, T.B. 1961.Catalpa glycosides. I. The characterization of catalposide.J. Org. Chem. 26:3090–3094.Google Scholar
  6. Bowers, M.D. 1983. The role of iridoid glycosides in hostplant specificity of checkerspot butterflies.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:475–493.Google Scholar
  7. Bowers, M.D. 1984. Iridoid glycosides and hostplant specificity in larvae of the buckeye butterfly,Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1567–1577.Google Scholar
  8. Bowers, M.D., andPuttick, G.M. 1988. The effect of qualitative variation in iridoid glycosides on generalist and specialist herbivores.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:319–334.Google Scholar
  9. Brausten, L.B., Wilkinson, C.F., andEisner, T. 1977. Herbivore-plant interactions: Mixedfunction oxidases and secondary plant substances.Science 196:1349–1352.Google Scholar
  10. Burnett, W.C., Jones, S.B., Mabry, T.J., andPadolina, W.G. 1974. Sesquiterpene lactonesinsect feeding deterrents inVernonia.Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2:25–29.Google Scholar
  11. Chambliss, L., andJones, C.M. 1966. Cucurbitacins: Specific insect attractants in Cucurbitaceae.Science 153:1392–1393.Google Scholar
  12. Chang, C.C., andNakanishi, K. 1983. Specionin, an iridoid insect antifeedant fromCatalpa speciosa.J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1983:605–606.Google Scholar
  13. Deboer, G., andHanson, F.E. 1984. Foodplant selection and induction of feeding preference among host and non-host plants in larvae of the tobacco hornwormManduca sexta.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 35:177–193.Google Scholar
  14. Feeny, P. 1975. Biochemical coevolution between plants and their insect herbivores, pp. 3–19,in L.E. Gilbert and P.H. Raven (eds.). Coevolution of Animals and Plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  15. Gould, F. 1984. Mixed function oxidases and herbivore polyphagy: the devil's advocate position.Ecol. Entom. 9:29–34.Google Scholar
  16. Inouye, H. 1971. Biosynthesis of iridoid and secoiridoid glucosides, pp. 290–313,in H. Wagner and L. Horhammer (eds.). Pharmocognosy and Phytochemistry. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, S.R., Nielsen, B.J., andDahlgren, R. 1975. Iridoid compounds, their occurrence and systematic importance in the angiosperms.Bot. Not. 128:148–180.Google Scholar
  18. Jermy, T., Hanson, F.E., andDethier, V.G. 1968. Induction of specific food preference in lepidopterous larvae.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 11:211–230.Google Scholar
  19. Jirawongse, V. 1964. A chemotaxonomic study of the Scrophulariaceae. PhD thesis. Purdue University, University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  20. Kooiman, P. 1972. The occurrence of iridoid glycosides in the Scrophulariaceae.Acta Bot. Neerl. 19:329–340.Google Scholar
  21. Krieger, R.I., Feeny, P., andWilkinson, C.F. 1971. Detoxification enzymes in the guts of caterpillars: An evolutionary answer to plant defenses?Science 172:579–581.Google Scholar
  22. Metcalf, C.L., Flint, W.P., andMetcalf, R.L. 1962. Destructive and Useful Insects, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, J.S., andFeeny, P. 1983. Effects of benzylisoquinoline alkaloids on the larvae of polyphagous Lepidoptera.Oecologia 58:332–339.Google Scholar
  24. Nayar, J.K., andFraenkel, G. 1963. The chemical basis of host selection in the catalpa sphinxCeratomia catalpae (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 56:119–122.Google Scholar
  25. Rhoades, D.F. 1979. Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores, pp. 3–54,in G.A. Rosenthal and D.H. Janzen, (eds.). Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Roby, M.R., andStermitz, F.R. 1984. Penstemonoside and other iridoids fromCastilleja rhexifolia: Conversion of penstemonoside to the pyridine monoterpene alkaloid rhexifoline.J. Nat. Prod. 47:853–859.Google Scholar
  27. Schoonhoven, L.M. 1972. Secondary plant substances and insects.Recent Adv. Phytochem. 5:197–224.Google Scholar
  28. Scriber, J.M., andFeeny, P. 1979. Growth of herbivorous caterpillars in relation to feeding specialization and to the growth form of their food plants.Ecology 60:829–850.Google Scholar
  29. Slansky, F., andFeeny, P.P. 1977. Stabilization of the rate of nitrogen accumulation by larvae of the cabbage butterfly on wild and cultivated food plants.Ecol. Monogr. 47:209–228.Google Scholar
  30. Slansky, F., andScriber, J.M. 1985. Food consumption and utilization, pp. 87–163,in G.A. Kerkut and L.I. Gilbert, (eds.). Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 4. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Sokal, R.R., andRohlf, F.J. 1969. Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  32. Soo Hoo, C.F., andFraenkel, G. 1966. The selection of food plants in a polyphagous insect,Prodenia eridania (Cramer).J. Insect. Physiol. 12:693–709.Google Scholar
  33. Tietz, H.M. 1972. An Index to the Life Histories of the North American Macrolepidoptera. Allyn Museum of Entomology, Sarasota, Florida.Google Scholar
  34. Usher, B.F., andFeeny, P. 1983. Atypical secondary compounds in the family Cruciferae: tests for toxicity toPieris rapae, an adapted crucifer-feeding insect.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 34:257–262.Google Scholar
  35. Waldbauer, G.P. 1962. The growth and reproduction of maxillectomized tobacco hornworms feeding on normally rejected non-solanaceous plants.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 5:147–158.Google Scholar
  36. Waldbauer, G.P. 1968. The consumption and utilization of food by insects.Adv. Insect. Physiol. 5:229–288.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gillian M. Puttick
    • 1
  • M. Deane Bowers
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum of Comparative ZoologyHarvard UniversityCambridge

Personalised recommendations