Skip to main content
Log in

Ovipositional behavior of lesser peachtree borer in presence of host-plant volatiles

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reactions of lesser peachtree borer [Synanthedon pictipes (G&R)] to volatiles of peach wood, either natural or chemically fractionated, were observed. Mated females were stimulated by and responsive to such materials and deposited significantly more eggs on substrates, including unnatural hosts, that had been treated with aqueous mixtures of bark-canker materials. Stimulation to oviposit occurred even when the female was blinded, indicating the presence of chemical cues. Natural canker-bark extracts immediately stimulated ovipostion and for a few hours significantly increased the number of eggs laid. However, average fecundity was not increased. Antennectomy did not significantly decrease response to volatiles by gravid females, and alternate sites of such chemoreception were not located. Complex mixtures derived by solvent extraction, steam distillation, and volatiles trapping from bark, canker, and gum all had activity. Observations of insect behavior in outdoor cages and also in the laboratory indicated that visual, chemosensory, and mechanosensory receptors are involved in host finding and oviposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, J.F., Mikolajczak, K.L., andReed, D.K., 1987. Analysis of peach bark volatiles and their electroantennogram activity with lesser peachtree borer,Synanthedon pictipes (Grote and Robinson).J. Chem. Ecol. 13:2103–2114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobb, M.L. 1959. The biology of the lesser peachtree borer in Virginia.J. Econ. Entomol. 53:634–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W.L., Jr., Eisner, T., andWhittaker, R.H. 1970. Allomones and kairomones: Transpacific chemical messengers.BioScience 20:21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, M.L., Wong, T.T.Y., andLamansky, K.W. 1968. Rearing methods and biology of the lesser peachtree borer,Synanthedon pictipes, in the laboratory.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61:809–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deseo, K.V. 1976. The oviposition of the Indian meal moth (Plodia interpunctella HBN., Lep., Phyticidae) influenced by olfactory stimuli and antennectomy.Symp. Biol. Hung. 16:61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests.Biometrics 11:1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, C.R., andWells, J.M., 1982. Evidence of an ovipositional stimulant for peachtree borer.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1125–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girault, A.A. 1907. The lesser peachtree borer.U.S.D.A. Bur. Entomol. Bull. 68(partIV):31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, E. M. 1947. Perennial peach canker and the canker complex in New York, with methods of control.Cornell Univ. Agric. Stn. Mem. 276:1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.L. 1917. The lesser peachtree borer.Ohio Agric. Exp. Bull. 307:399–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, S.T., andNickerson, G.B. 1964. Detection of certain hop constituents in brewing products.Proc. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 5–13.

  • Saxena, K.N., andGoyal, S. 1978. Host-plant relations of the citrus butterflyPapilio demoleus L.: Orientation and ovipositional responses.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, E. 1976. Sensory aspects of insect plant interactions, pp. 228–248,in Proceedings of XV International Congress of Entomologists, August 19–27, Washington, D.C.

  • Stadler, E. 1980. Chemoreception on arthropods: Sensory physiology and ecological chemistry, pp. 223–241,in R. Gilles (ed.). Animal and Environmental Fitness. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, E. 1983. Attractants, arrestants, feeding and ovipositional stimulants in insect-plant relationships: Application for pest control, pp. 243–258,in D.L. Whitehead and W.S. Bowers (eds.). Natural Products for Innovative Pest Management. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, F.C. 1986.Cytospora canker and the establishment of lesser peachtree borer (Lepidoptera: Sessiidae) in peach trees.J. Econ. Entomol. 79:537–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, L.F., andNorris, D.M. 1982. Light and other stimullii in the location of feeding sites by lesser peachtree borer larvae.Environ. Entomol. 11:399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, R.T., andFraenkel, G.S. 1960. The specificity of the tobacco hornworm,Protoparce sexta, to solanaceous plants.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 53:503–507.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mention of firm or product names does not imply recommendation or endorsement by USDA over others not mentioned.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reed, D.K., Mikolajczak, K.L. & Krause, C.R. Ovipositional behavior of lesser peachtree borer in presence of host-plant volatiles. J Chem Ecol 14, 237–252 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022544

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022544

Key words

Navigation