Skip to main content
Log in

Hypefine critical exponents and probe disturbance effects

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of probe disturbance is considered for static critical exponents that are determined from hyperfine fields on isolated impurity probes in a magnetic solid. Based on Ising model calculations and reanalysis of relevant experimental data, it is concluded that for reduced temperatures restricted tot≤10−2, the systematic error made in a hyperfine measurement of the exponent β is less than 2%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. Letters 24 (1970) 1479;

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.P. Kadanoff, 1970 Varenna Summer School on Critical phenomena, ed. M.S. Green (Academic Press, New York, 1971) p. 100;

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.E. Stanley, A. Hankey and M.H. Lee,op. cit., p. 237.

  4. M.E. Fisher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46 (1974) 597.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.K. Wertheim, H.J. Guggenheim and D.N.E. Buchanan, Phys. Rev. Letters 20 (1968) 1158.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Hohenemser, in Hyperfine interactions studied by nuclear reactions and decay, Contributed papers, ed. E. Karlsson and R. Wäppling (University of Uppsala, Sweden, 1974) p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.L. Oddou, J. Moulin and P. Peretto, Phys. Letters 48A (1974) 55;

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.L. Oddou, J. Berthier and P. Peretto, Phys. Letters 45A (1973) 445.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Bleck, R. Butt, R. Michaelson, S.S. Rosenblum and W.D. Zeitz, in Hyperfine interactions studied by nuclear reactions and decay, Contributed papers, ed. E. Karlsson and R. Wäppling (University of Uppsala, Sweden, 1974) p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T.K. Bergstresser, Phys. Rev. B, to be published.

  11. S.W. Lovesey and W. Marshall, Proc. Phys. Soc. 89 (1966) 613.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.C. Reno and C. Hohenemser, Phys. Rev. Letters 25 (1970) 1007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Kachnowski, A. M. Gottlieb and C. Hohenemser, in Hyperfine interactions studied by nuclear reactions and decay, Contributed papers, ed. E. Karlsson and R. Wäppling (University of Uppsala, Sweden, 1974) p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.S. Kouvel and J.B. Comly, Phys. Rev. Letters 20 (1968) 1237.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Arrott and J.E. Noakes, Phys. Rev. Letters, 19 (1967) 786.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Hohenemser, T. Kachnowski and T.K. Bergstresser, Phys. Rev. B, to be published.

  17. J.L. Oddou, P. Peretto and J. Berthier, Int. Conf. on Hyperfine interactions (Leuven, Belgium, September 1975).

  18. R. Suter and C. Hohenemser, 21 st Annual Conf. on Magnetism and magnetic materials (Philadelphia, 1975) AIP Conference Proceedings, to be published.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work supported in part by the National Science Foundation, USA, and the Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie, the Netherlands.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergstresser, T.K., Kachnowski, T. & Hohenemser, C. Hypefine critical exponents and probe disturbance effects. Hyperfine Interact 1, 323–328 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022464

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022464

Keywords

Navigation