Skip to main content
Log in

Perturbed angular correlations with111Cd in the α and δ phases of In-Sn

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence on the TDPAC distribution of dissolved impurities (Sn in In) and (In in Sn) as a function of concentration has been studied at room temperature and at liquid-nitrogen temperature. Models for the observed distributions of the electric field gradients are discussed. The results are consistent with theoretical estimates of the screening charge distribution around the valency impurity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Bożek, J. Golczewski, B. Ingarden-Dutkiewicz, J. Kajfosz, M. Lach and P. Wodniecki, in Hyperfine interactions studied in nuclear reactions and decay. Uppsala, Sweden, 1974, contributed paper IV. 43, p. 228.

  2. M. Forker, Nucl. Instr. 106 (1973) 121.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Zmora, L.M. Lowe and W.V. Prestwich, Nucl. Instr. 113 (1973) 155.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Matthias, W. Schneider and R.M. Steffen, Phys. Letters 4 (1963) 41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Kohn and S.H. Vosko, Phys. Rev. 119 (1960) 912.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Budtz-Jørgensen, F. Abildskov, K. Bonde-Nielsen, H. Ravn and U. Willumsen, Phys. Rev. B8 (1973) 5411.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.S. Langer and S.H. Vosko, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 12 (1959) 196.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W.T. Anderson, Jr., F.C. Tatcher and R.E. Hewitt, Phys. Rev. 171 (1968) 541. F.C. Tatcher and R.E. Hewitt, Phys. Rev. B1 (1970) 454; the α value cited by us corresponds to a new value for the quadrupole moment of115In.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.J. Helfrich and R.A. Dood, Acta Met. 12 (1964) 667.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.G. Fink, E.R. Jette, S. Katz and F.J. Schnettler, Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 88 (1945) 321.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F.D. Feiock and W.R. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 187 (1969) 39.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.S. Raghavan, P. Raghavan and J.M. Friedt, Phys. Rev. Letters 30 (1972) 10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Behar and R.M. Steffen, Phys. Rev. C 7 (1973) 788.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Bertschat, H. Haas, F. Pleiter, E. Recknagel, E. Schlodder and B. Spellmeyer, in Hyperfine interactions studied in nuclear reactions and decay, Uppsala, Sweden, 1974, contributed paper II. 8, p. 40.

  15. M. Forker, J.B. Fechner, H. Haverkamp and G. Schäfer,ibid contributed paper IV. 39, p. 220.

  16. E.N. Kaufmann, Phys. Rev. B8 (1973) 1382 and 1387.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Berthier, P. Boyer and J.I. Vargas, Proc. Intern. Conf. Hyperfine interactions detected by nuclear radiations (Rehovot, Israel, 1970).

  18. E. Gerdau, J. Wolf, H. Winkler and J. Braunfurth, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A311 (1969) 197.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Budtz-Jørgensen, C., Bonde Nielsen, K. Perturbed angular correlations with111Cd in the α and δ phases of In-Sn. Hyperfine Interact 1, 81–92 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022444

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022444

Keywords

Navigation