Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 12, Issue 8, pp 1755–1764 | Cite as

Structural and metabolic changes in femaleSchistosoma mansoni following male stimulation

  • David A. Erasmus
Article

Abstract

Pairing of males and females from single-sex infections results in the multiplication and differentiation of undifferentiated cells of the vitelline lobule culminating in the production of mature vitelline cells involved in egg shell formation. These changes are accompanied by increases in the rate of uptake of tyrosine, thymidine, and an increased accumulation of calcium.

Key words

Schistosoma mansoni vitelline gland differentiation tyrosine thymidine calcium rates of uptake male stimulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Byram, J.E., andSenft, A.W. 1979. Structure of the schistosome egg shell: Amino acid analysis and incorporation of labeled amino acids.Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 28:539–547.Google Scholar
  2. Clegg, J.A., andSmyth, J.D. 1968. Growth, development and culture methods, pp. 395–466,in M. Florkin (ed.). Chemical Zoology, Vol. 11. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Den Hollander, J.E., andErasmus, D.A. 1984.Schistosoma mansoni: DNA synthesis in males and females from mixed and single-sex infections.Parasitology 88:463–476.Google Scholar
  4. Den Hollander, J.E., andErasmus, D.A. 1986).Schistosoma mansoni: Male stimulation and DNA synthesis.Parasitology 91:431–459.Google Scholar
  5. Erasmus, D.A. 1973. A comparative study of the reproductive system of mature, immature and “unisexual” femaleSchistosoma mansoni.Parasitology 67:165–183.Google Scholar
  6. Erasmus, D.A. 1975a. The subcellular localization of labeled tyrosine in the vitelline cells ofSchistosoma mansoni.Z. Parasitenkd. 46:75–81.Google Scholar
  7. Erasmus, D.A. 1975b.Schistosoma mansoni: Development of the vitelline cell, its role in drug sequestration and changes induced by Astiban.Exp. Parasitol. 38:240–356.Google Scholar
  8. Erasmus, D.A., andDavies, T.W. 1979.Schistosoma mansoni andS. haematobium: Calcium metabolism of the vitelline cell.Exp. Parasitol. 47:91–106.Google Scholar
  9. Erasmus, D.A., andPopiel, I., 1980.Schistosoma mansoni: Drug-induced changes in the cell population of the vitelline gland.Exp. Parasitol. 50:171–187.Google Scholar
  10. Erasmus, D.A., Popiel, I., andShaw, J.R. 1982. A comparative study of the vitelline cell ofSchistosoma mansoni, S. haematobium, S. japonicum, andS. mattheei.Parasitology 84:283–287.Google Scholar
  11. Gönnert, R. 1955. Schistosomiasis studies 11. Uber die Eibildung bySchistosoma mansoni und das Schickal der Eir in Wirtorganismus.Z. Trop. Parasitol. 6:33–52.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, A.R.C., Russell, R.J., andCharters, A.D. 1984. A review of schistosomiasis in immigrants in western Australia, demonstrating the unusual longevity ofSchistosoma mansoni.Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 78:385–388.Google Scholar
  13. Johri, L.N., andSmyth, J.D. 1956. A histochemical approach to the study of helminth morphology.Parasitology 46:107–116.Google Scholar
  14. Moore, D.V., andSandground, J.H. 1956. The relative egg producing capacity ofSchistosoma mansoni andSchistosoma japonicum.Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 5:831–840.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, D.V., Yolles, T.K., andMeleney, H.E. 1954. The relationship of male worms to the sexual development of femaleSchistosoma mansoni.J. Parasitol. 40:166–185.Google Scholar
  16. Nollen, P.M., Floyd, R.D., Kolzow, R.G., andDeters, D.L. 1976. The timing of reproductive cell development and movement inSchistosoma mansoni. S. japonicum, andS. haematobium using techniques of autoradiography and transplantation.J. Parasitol. 62:227–231.Google Scholar
  17. Popiel, I., andBasch, P.F. 1984. Reproductive development of femaleSchistosoma mansoni (Digenea: Schistosomatidae) following bisexual pairing of worms and worm segments.J. Exp. Zool. 232:141–150.Google Scholar
  18. Popiel, I., andErasmus, D.A. 1981.Schistosoma mansoni: Niridazole induced damage to the vitelline gland.Exp. Parasitol. 52:35–48.Google Scholar
  19. Popiel, I., andErasmus, D.A. 1982.Schistosoma mansoni: The survival and reproductive status of mature infections in mice treated with oxamniquine.J. Helminthol. 56:257–261.Google Scholar
  20. Popiel, I., Cioli, D., andErasmus, D.A. 1984. Reversibility of drag induced regression in femaleSchistosoma mansoni upon pairing with male worms in vivo.Z. Parasitenkd. 70:421–424.Google Scholar
  21. Shaw, J.R., andErasmus, D.A. 1981.Schistosoma mansoni: An examination of the reproductive status of females from single sex infections.Parasitology 82:121–124.Google Scholar
  22. Shaw, M.K., andErasmus, D.A. 1982.Schistosoma mansoni: The presence and ultrastructure of the vitelline cells in adult males.J. Helminthol. 56:51–53.Google Scholar
  23. Shaw, M.K., andErasmus, D.A. 1983.Schistosoma mansoni: Changes in elemental composition in relation to the age and sexual status of the worms.Parasitology 86:439–453.Google Scholar
  24. Shaw, J.R., Marshall, I. andErasmus, D.A. 1977.Schistosoma mansoni: In vitro stimulation of vitelline cell development by extracts of male worms.Exp. Parasitol. 42:14–20.Google Scholar
  25. Short, R.B. 1983. Sex and the single schistosome.J. Parasitol. 69:3–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Erasmus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity CollegeCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations