Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A review of employee evaluation procedures and a description of “high potential” executives and professionals

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews standard personnel selection procedures with a focus on the personal interview, the assessment center, and standard psychological tests. A testing system is described that has been used by companies to select executives and professionals. Finally, psychological characteristics of “high potential” executives and professionals are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society for Personnel Administration. (1985).Results of a resource survey on testing. Arlington, VA: ASPA Information Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E. (in press). The managerial and professional job functions inventory (MP-JFI). In S. Gael (Ed.),Job analysis handbook. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Baehr, M.E. (1984a).The development and validation of the estimates of potential for successful performance (PSP) of higher-level personnel. Chicago: The University of Chicago, Office of Continuing Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E. (1984b). The empirical link between program development and performance needs of professionals and executives.Continuum, 48, 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E. (1981).A job-focussed approach to the validation of screening procedures for first line supervisory positions. Chicago: The University of Chicago, Human Resources Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E. (1976).National validation of a selection test battery for male transit bus operators. (UMTA-MA-06-0011-77-1). Chicago: The University of Chicago, Industrial Relations Center. (NTIS No. PB-283 709/AS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E. (1957).The Temperament Comparator. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E., and Allen, D.C. (1984).Managerial and Professional Job Functions Inventory: Interpretation and research manual. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, G.O., & Baehr, M.E. (1958).EMO Questionnaire. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E., & Corsini, R.J. (1957).The Press Test. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E., & Froemel, E.C. (1980).Experience and Background Inventory. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E., Furcon, J.E., & Froemel, E.C. (1968).Psychological assessment of patrolman qualifications in relation to field performance. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E., Lonergan, W.G., & Hunt, B.A. (1978).Managerial and Professional Job Functions Inventory. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E., & Moretti, D.M. (1985).System for Testing and Evaluation of Potential (STEP) and legal compliance. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E., Penny, R.E., III & Froemel, E.C. (1980).A validation and analysis of selection procedures for male and female bus operators (Final Report, UMTA-MA-06-0011-77-1). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, M.E., & Williams, G.B. (1968). Prediction of sales success from factorially determined dimensions of personal background data.Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.J., Bobko, P., & Pine, S.M. (1977). Single-group validity: Fallacy of the facts?Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 155–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, G.K., Seashore, H.G., & Wesman, A.G. (1951).Counseling from profiles: A casebook for the Differential Aptitude Tests. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentz, V.J. (1983). Research findings from personality assessment of executives.Sixth annual symposium on applied behavioral science, at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, V.R. (1977) Differential prediction: A methodological artifact?Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 146–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D.W., & Campbell, R.J. (1968). Selection of salesmen by means of an assessment center.Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D.W., Campbell, R.J., & Grant, D.L. (1974).Formative years in business: A long-term AT&T study of managerial lives. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D.W., & Grant, R.J. (1966). The assessment center in the measurement of potential for business management.Psychological Monographs,80 (Serial No. 625).

  • Bruce, M.M. (1959).Bruce Vocabulary Inventory. New Rochelle, NY: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsini, R.J. (1957).Nonverbal Reasoning. Park Ridge, IL: London, House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Development Dimensions (1975).Catalog of assessment and development exercises. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.

  • Dipboye, R.L., Fontenelle, G.A., and Garner, K. (1984). Effects of previewing the application on interview process and outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnette, M.D. (1976). Aptitudes, abilities, and skills. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.),Handbook of industrial-organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnette, M.D., (1962). Personnel management.Annual Review of Psychology, 13, 285–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak, B.J. (1956). The general aptitude test battery.Personnel and Guidance Journal, 35, 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, B.J., & Muchinsky, P.M. (1982). Biodata determinants of vocational typology: An integration of two paradigms.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 714–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1970).Guidelines on employee selection procedures. Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furcon, J.E., Baehr, M.E., and Zolik, E.S. (1966).Creative personality: A factor analytic study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

  • Ghiselli, E.E. (1971).Explorations in managerial talent. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, P.W.B. (1980).Salary prediction in higher-level positions by job functions performed and incumbent qualifications. Chicago: The University of Chicago, Human Resources Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, L.D., & Schrader, W.J. (1963). An empirically derived managerial key for the California Psychological Inventory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H.G. (1957).California Psychological Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R.M. (1976). Recruiting, selection, and job replacement. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.),Handbook of industrial-organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamner, W.C., Kim, J.S., Baird, L., & Bigoness, W.T. (1974). Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential employees in a simulated work sampling task.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 705–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S.R., & McKinley, J.C. (1957).Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, H.G., III, Schwab, D.P., Huett, D.L., & Ford, J.J. (1975). Interviewer validity as a function of interview structure, biographical data, and interviewee order.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 748–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.L. (1966).The psychology of vocational choice. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck, J.R., & Bray, D.W. (1976). Management assessment center evaluations and subsequent job performance of white and black females.Personnel Psychology, 29, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Resources Center, The University of Chicago. (1961).Word Fluency. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1978). Differential and single-group validity of employment tests by race: A critical analysis of three recent studies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Relations Center, The University of Chicago (1967).Technical appendix to validation of a sales selection test battery against paired comparison ratings of performance on the job. Chicago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzell, R.A., & Dyer, F.J. (1977). Differential validity revived.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • London House, Inc. (1983).London House testing and evaluations programs. Park Ridge, IL: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D.W. (1975).An overview of assessment centers (Technical Report). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manpower Research and Development Division, The University of Chicago. (1971).The establishment of a management appraisal program and validation of a psychological test battery for assessment of management potential. Chicago: The University of Chicago, Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D.C. (1961).The achieving society. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, E.J., DeNisi, A.S., & Shaw, J.B. (1979). Use of the Position Analysis Questionnaire for establishing the job component validity of tests.Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, E.J., Jeanneret, P.R., & Mecham, R.C. (1979).Position Analysis Questionnaire. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mecham, R.C., & McCormick, E.J. (1969).The use of data based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire in developing synthetically derived attribute requirements of jobs. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Occupational Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P.E. (1954).Clinical vs. Statistical Prediction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiner, A.G., & Owens, W.A. (1985). Using Biodata to predict job choice among college graduates.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSS Assessment Staff (1948).The assessment of men. New York: Reinhart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panel discussion on the changing role of the human resources executive. (1985).Personnel, pp. 22–28.

  • Sackett, P.R., & Dreher, G.F. (1982). Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F.L., Berner, J.G., & Hunter, J.E. (1973). Racial differences in validity of employment tests: Reality or illusion?Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E., Pearlman, K., & Shane, G.S. (1979). Further tests of the Schmidt-Hunter bayesian validity generalization procedure.Personnel Psychology, 32, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E., & Urry, V.W. (1976). Statistical power in criterion-related validation studies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F.L., & Johnson, R.H. (1973). Effect of race on peer ratings in an industrial situation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 237–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., & Hill, T.E. (1977). Sex and race composition of assessment center groups as a determinant of peer and assessor ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 261–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRA Test Catalogue for Business (1985). Chicago: Science Research Associates.

  • Standards for Educational & Psychological Tests (1974). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Inc.

  • Thurstone, L.L., & Jeffrey, T.E. (1956).Closure Flexibility (Concealed Figures). Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, T.G., & Mellinger, J.J. (1957).Cree Questionnaire. Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, D.H., & Rowe, P.M. (1977). Consulting the application form prior to the interview: An essential step in the selection process.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnage, J.J., & Muchinsky, P.M. (1984). A comparison of the predictive validity of assessment center evaluations versus traditional measures in forecasting supervisory job performance: Interpretative implications of criterion distortion for the assessment paradigm.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 595–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures (1978). Adopted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, the Department of Justice, and the Civil Service Commission.Federal Register 43, pp. 38290–38315.

  • Webster, E.C. (1964).Decision making in the employment interview. Montreal: McGill University, Industrial Relations Center.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London House, Inc., The University Of Chicago, Chicago

    Melany E. Baehr

Authors
  1. Melany E. Baehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baehr, M.E. A review of employee evaluation procedures and a description of “high potential” executives and professionals. J Bus Psychol 1, 172–202 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020808

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020808

Keywords

Search

Navigation