Skip to main content
Log in

Positioning models in marketing: Toward a normative-integrated model

  • Research Notes
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we argue that the optimal use of positioning models employed in marketing communication (e.g., multiattribute attitude models, self-image congruence models) is a function of situational factors such as product utilitarianism and product value-expressiveness. A normative model is introduced to show how positioning models can be used effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assael, H. (1985).Marketing management: strategy and action. Boston: Kent Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F.M. & Talarzyk, W.W. (1972). An attitude model for the study of brand preference.Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (February), 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, H.W., Jr., Ray, M.L. and Strong, E.G. (1972). An attitudinal framework for advertising strategy.Journal of Marketing, 36 (April), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P.R. (1982). Person-situation: segmentation's missing link.Journal of Marketing, 46 (Fall), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P.R. and Ginter, J.L. (1987). Market segmentation, product differentiation, and marketing strategy.Journal of Marketing, 51 (April), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell, G. (1982). Terms vs. concepts: marketing segmentation, brand positioning and other aspects of the academic-practitioner gap. In theProceedings of the Educator's Conference on Marketing Theory, San Antonio, Texas.

  • Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, attitude, intention and behavior, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of the relationship between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object.Human Relations, 16, 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.E. and Massy, W.F. (1965). Market segmentation and the effectiveness of a brand's price and dealing policies.Journal of Business, 38 (April), 186–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A.G. and Levitt, C. (1984). Audience involvement in advertising: four levels.Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (June), 581–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, R.I. (1968). Benefit segmentation, a decision-oriented research tool.Journal of Marketing, 32 (July), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1984).Marketing management, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1986).Principles of marketing, Third Edition. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, R.J. (1975). Changing brand attitudes through modification of cognitive structure.Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (March), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V. and Jain, A.K. (1978). An approach to normative segmentation.Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (August), 338–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oglivy, D. (1963).Confessions of an advertising man, New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C.W., Jaworski, B.J. and Maclnnis, D.J. (1987). Strategic brand concept-image management.Journal of Marketing, 50 (October), 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punj, G. and Stewart, D.W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for applications.Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (May), 134–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J.T. (1974). The concept and application of life style segmentation.Journal of Marketing, 38 (January), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, M.L. (1982).Advertising and communication management, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R. (1961).Reality in advertising, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M.J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review.Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (December), 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M.J. (1985). Self-image/product image congruity and consumer decision making.International Journal of Management, 2 (December), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M.J. and Johar, J.S. (1985). Self-image congruence models versus multiattribute attitude models: when to use what model for product positioning. In R.F. Lusch, G.T. Ford, G.L. Frazier, R.D. Howell, C.A. Imgeme, M. Reilly, and R.W. Stampfl, (Eds.),1985 AMA Educators' Proceedings. Chicago: American Marketing Association, (pp. 1–5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, W.A., Munson, J.M., and Locander, W.B. (1983). Improving the effectiveness of persuasive communications: matching message with functional profile.Journal of Business Research, 11 (June), 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umesh, U.N. (1987). Transferability of preference models across segments and geographic areas.Journal of Marketing, 51 (January), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind, Y. (1978). Issues and advances in segmentation research.Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (August), 338–345.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johar, J.S., Joseph Sirgy, M. Positioning models in marketing: Toward a normative-integrated model. J Bus Psychol 3, 475–485 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020715

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020715

Keywords

Navigation