Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 58, Issue 1–2, pp 371–373 | Cite as

Response to “the Büttiker-Landauer model generalized”

  • M. Büttiker
  • R. Landauer
Short Communications

Abstract

Støvneng and Hauge have criticized our interpretation of what we have called the traversal time for tunneling. This is a brief rebuttal.

Key words

Tunneling traversal time modulated barrier 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. A. Støvneng and E. H. Hauge,J. Stat. Phys. (1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Büttiker and R. Landauer,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49:1739 (1982).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Büttiker and R. Landauer,J. Phys. C 21:6207 (1988).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. H. Hauge and J. A. Støvneng, Tunneling times: A critical view,Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Landauer,Nature 341:567 (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. R. Leavens and G. C. Aers,Solid State Commun. 63:1101, 1107 (1987); C. R. Leavens and G. C. Aers,Phys. Rev. B 39:1202 (1989).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Büttiker,Phys. Rev. B 27:6178 (1983).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Büttiker, Traversal reflection and dwell time for quantum tunneling, inElectronic Properties of Multilayers and Low Dimensional Semiconductor Structures, J. M. Chamberlain, L. Eaves, and J. C. Portal, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Büttiker
    • 1
  • R. Landauer
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Research DivisionT. J. Watson Research CenterYorktown Heights

Personalised recommendations