Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The psychology of the near miss

Journal of gambling behavior volume 2, pages 32–39 (1986)Cite this article

Abstract

Near misses are widely believed to encourage future play, even in games of chance where the probability of winning remains constant from trial to trial. Some commercial gambling systems, particularly instant lotteries and slot machines, are contrived to ensure a higher frequency of near misses than would be expected by chance alone. Theoretical interpretations and relevant experiments are examined. A distinction is drawn between possible short-term and longer-term effects of manipulating the rate of occurrence of near misses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.Psychological Bulletin, 55 102–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsel, A. (1968). Secondary reinforcement and frustration.Psychological Bulletin, 69 278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergler, E. (1958).The Psychology of Gambling London: Hanison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1982). The Psychology of Preferences.Scientific American, January, 136–142.

  • Loftus, G. R. and Loftus, E. K. (1983)Mind at Play New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E.J. (1975). The illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowrer, O.H. (1960).Learning Theory and Behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission (1978).Report of the Royal Commission on Gambling. Command 7200. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarne, J. (1975).Scarne's New Complete Guide to Gambling. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1953).Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. & Razzell, P. (1975).The Pools Winners. London: Caliban Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, L.H. & Grote, F.W. (1967). Temporal presentation of winning symbols and slot machine playing.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, England

    R. L. Reid

Authors
  1. R. L. Reid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The first four experiments reported in the text were carried out by Amanda Shattock, supported by a Grant from the Social Science Research Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reid, R.L. The psychology of the near miss. J Gambling Stud 2, 32–39 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019932

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019932

Keywords

search

Navigation