Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 485–494 | Cite as

A three-stage process of reactions to change: Maternal employment and day care

  • Hyman Rodman
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

This article delineates a three-stage process of reactions to social and economic changes that threaten traditional values. In the first stage, public and professional reactions are predominantly negative; in the second stage, predominantly ambivalent; and in the third stage, predominantly accepting. This three-stage process is used to analyze the reactions to increases in maternal employment and day care. A key issue for future investigation is whether the same process represents a predictable sequence of reactions to other social and economic changes that threaten traditional values.

Key words

day care family change maternal employment reactions to change self-care 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auerbach, J. D. (1988).In the business of child care: Employer initiatives and working women. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. Belsky, J. (1988). The “effects” of infant day care reconsidered.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 3, 235–272.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, J., & Eggebeen, D. (1991). Early and extensive maternal employment and young children's socioemotional development: Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 1083–1110.Google Scholar
  4. Belsky, J., & Steinberg, L. D. (1978). The effects of day care: A critical review.Child Development, 49, 929–949.Google Scholar
  5. Bremner, R. H. (1974).Children and youth in America: A documentary history (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Etaugh, C. (1980). Effects of nonmaternal care on children: Research evidence and popular views.American Psychologist, 35, 309–319.Google Scholar
  7. Fein, G., & Fox, N. (Eds.). (1988). Infant day care [Special issues].Early Childhood Research Quarterly,3, (3/4).Google Scholar
  8. Flynn, C. P., & Rodman, H. (1991). Latchkey children and after-school care: A feminist dilemma? In E. A. Anderson & R. C. Hula (Eds.),The reconstruction of family policy (pp. 77–89). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  9. Galambos, N. L., Petersen, A. C., & Lenerz, K. (1988). Maternal employment and sex typing in early adolescence: Contemporaneous and longitudinal relations. In A. E. Gottfried & A. W. Gottfried (Eds.),Maternal employment and children's development: Longitudinal research (pp. 155–189). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  10. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1957). Working mothers and delinquency.Mental Hygiene, 41, 327–352.Google Scholar
  11. Goldin, C. (1988).Marriage bias: Discrimination against married women workers, 1920's to 1950's (Working Paper No. 2747). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  12. Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1988). Maternal employment and children's development: An integration of longitudinal findings with implications for social policy. In A. E. Gottfried & A. W. Gottfried (Eds.),Maternal employment and children's development: Longitudinal research (pp. 269–287). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Gottfried, A. E., Gottfried, A. W., & Bathurst, K. (1988). Maternal employment, family environment, and children's development: Infancy through the school years. In A. E. Gottfried & A. W. Gottfried (Eds.),Maternal employment and children's development: Longitudinal research (pp. 11–58). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  14. Hand, H. B. (1957). Working mothers and maladjusted children.Journal of Educational Sociology, 30, 245–246.Google Scholar
  15. Hochschild, A. R. (1989).The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman, L. W. (1961). Effects of maternal employment on the child.Child Development, 32, 187–197.Google Scholar
  17. Hoffman, L. W. (1984). Work, family, and the socialization of the child. In R. D. Parke (Ed.),Review of child development research, (Vol. 7) (pp. 223–282). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Leslie, L. A., Anderson, E. A., & Branson, M. P. (1991). Responsibility for children: The role of gender and employment.Journal of Family Issues, 12, 197–210.Google Scholar
  19. MacEwen, K. E., & Barling, J. (1991). Effects of maternal employment experiences on children's behavior via mood, cognitive difficulties, and parenting behavior.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 635–644.Google Scholar
  20. Menaghan, E. G., & Parcel, T. L. (1990). Parental employment and family life: Research in the 1980s.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1079–1098.Google Scholar
  21. Morgan, H., & Tucker, K. (1991).Companies that care: The most family-friendly companies in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Pleck, J. H. (1979). Men's family work: Three perspectives and some new data.Family Coordinator, 28, 481–488.Google Scholar
  23. Rodman, H. (1988). From latchkey stereotypes toward self-care realities. In S. K. Steinmetz (Ed.),Family and support systems across the life span (pp. 99–104). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. Rodman, H., Pratto, D. J., & Nelson, R. S. (1985). Child care arrangements and children's functioning: A comparison of self-care and adult-care children.Developmental Psychology, 21, 413–418.Google Scholar
  25. Rodman, H., & Sidden, J. (1992). A critique of pessimistic views about United States families.Family Relations, 41, 436–439.Google Scholar
  26. Rutter, M. (1981). Social-emotional consequences of day care for preschool children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 4–28.Google Scholar
  27. Scanzoni, J. (1991). Balancing the policy interests of children and adults. In E. A. Anderson & R. C. Hula (Eds.),The reconstruction of family policy (pp. 11–22). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  28. Shelton, B. A. (1990). The distribution of household tasks: Does wife's employment status make a difference?Journal of Family Issues, 11, 115–135.Google Scholar
  29. Siegel, A. E., & Haas, M. B. (1963). The working mother: A review of research.Child Development, 34, 513–542.Google Scholar
  30. Siegel, A. E., Stolz, L. M., Hitchcock, E. A., & Adamson, J. (1959). Dependence and independence in the children of working mothers.Child Development, 30, 533–546.Google Scholar
  31. Spock, B. (1957).Baby and child care. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  32. Stolz, L. M. (1960). Effects of maternal employment on children: Evidence from research.Child Development, 31, 749–782.Google Scholar
  33. Thompson, R. A. (1991). Infant day care: Concerns, controversies, choices. In J. V. Lerner & N. L. Galambos (Eds.),Employed mothers and their children (pp. 9–36). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  34. Trost, C. (1992, February 18). To cut costs and keep the best people, more concerns offer flexible work plans.Wall Street Journal, pp. B1, B3.Google Scholar
  35. Yarrow, M. R., Scott, P., de Leeuw, L., & Heinig, C. (1962). Child-rearing in families of working and nonworking mothers.Sociometry, 25, 122–140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyman Rodman
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Development and Family StudiesUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboro

Personalised recommendations