Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 445–455 | Cite as

Financial responsibility for children following divorce and remarriage

  • Marilyn Coleman
  • Lawrence H. Ganong
Article

Abstract

In this article the phenomena of the declining financial status of children following the divorce of their parents are explored. Two cultural beliefs are proposed as particularly relevant for understanding why some parents do not provide financially for their children following divorce: the belief that the nuclear family form is the only one that is normal and natural, and the belief that an individual's rights are of supreme importance. The consequences of these beliefs for the financial support of children are discussed, and suggestions for addressing the situation are presented.

Key words

child support divorce mediation remarriage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. (1985).Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. (1989). [Longitudinal stepfamily research]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  3. Farber, B. (1973).Family and kinship in modern society. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  4. Fine, M. A., & Fine, D. R. (1992). Recent changes in laws affecting stepfamilies: Suggestions for legal reform.Family Relations, 41, 334–340.Google Scholar
  5. Haynes, J. (1988). Power balancing. In J. Folberg & A. Milne. (Eds.),Divorce mediation (pp. 277–296). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Hill, M. S. (1992). The role of economic resources and remarriage in financial assistance for children of divorce.Journal of Family Issues, 13, 158–178.Google Scholar
  7. Hoffman, S. D., & Duncan, G. J. (1988). What are the economic consequences of divorce?Demography, 25, 641–645.Google Scholar
  8. Miller, A. T. (1991).Tangling with pathology: Displacement and the private Western nuclear family. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  9. Pearson, J., & Thoennes, N. (1988). Divorce mediation research results. In J. Folberg & A. Milne. (Eds.),Divorce mediation (pp. 429–452). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Ramsey, S., & Masson, J. (1985). Stepparent support of stepchildren: A comparative analysis of policies and problems in the American and English experience.Syracuse Law Review, 36, 659–714.Google Scholar
  11. Redman, R. M. (1991). The support of children in blended families: A call for change.Family Law Quarterly, 25, 83–94.Google Scholar
  12. Tropf, W. D. (1984). An exploratory examination of the effect of remarriage on child support and personal contacts.Journal of Divorce, 7(3), 57–73.Google Scholar
  13. Uzoka, A. F. (1979). The myth of the nuclear family: Historical background and clinical implications.American Psychologist, 34, 1095–1106.Google Scholar
  14. Visher, E. B., & Visher, J. S. (1988).Old loyalties, new ties: Therapeutic strategies with stepfamilies. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  15. White, L. K., & Booth, A. (1985). The quality and stability of remarriages: The role of stepchildren.American Sociological Review, 50, 689–698.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marilyn Coleman
    • 1
  • Lawrence H. Ganong
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Missouri-ColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations