Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 407–419 | Cite as

Do families share-and-share-alike? The need to understand intrahousehold resource allocations

  • Cathleen D. Zick
Article

Abstract

There is much to be learned about familial resource sharing and the role it plays in individual welfare. This article encourages family economists to take the lead in investigating questions of intrahousehold resource allocations. The article reviews the descriptive and theoretical work that has been done in this area and concludes with suggestions of how family economists could expand on the work that has been done to date.

Key words

familial altruism household production intrahousehold resource allocations resource sharing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. S. (1976). Altruism, egoism, and genetic fitness: Economics and sociobiology.Journal of Economic Literature, 14, 817–826.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1981).A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Behrman, J. R. (1988). Intrahousehold allocation of nutrients in rural India: Are boys favored? Do parents exhibit inequality aversion?Oxford Economic Papers, 40, 32–54.Google Scholar
  4. Behrman J.R., & Deolalikar, A. (1988). Health and nutrition. In H. Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan (Eds.),Handbook of Development Economics (pp. 631–711). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, W. K., & Wang, Y. (1990). Time together, time apart: An economic analysis of shared time with spouses.Lifestyles: Family and Economic Issues, 11, 89–119.Google Scholar
  6. Bryant, W. K., & Zick, C. D. (in press). Are we investing less in the next generation? Historical trends in time spent caring for children. In R. Avery (Ed.)Household time use: Research in the 21st century, Proceedings of a conference in honor of Jean Warren and Kathryn Walker. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  7. Espenshade, T. J. (1984).Investing in children: New estimates of parental expenditures. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Gershuny, J., & Robinson, J. P. (1988). Historical changes in the household division of labor.Demography, 25, 537–552.Google Scholar
  9. Hirshleifer, J. (1977). Shakespeare vs. Becker on altruism: The importance of having the last word.Journal of Economic Literature, 15, 500–502.Google Scholar
  10. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.Google Scholar
  11. Kooreman, P., & Kapteyn, A. (1987). A disaggregated analysis of the allocation of time within the household.Journal of Political Economy, 95, 223–249.Google Scholar
  12. Lazear, E. P., & Michael, R. T. (1988).Allocation of income within the household. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lino, M. (1990). Expenditures on a child by husband-wife families.Family Economics Review, 3(3), 2–18.Google Scholar
  14. Lino, M. (1991). Expenditures on a child by single-parent families.Family Economics Review, 4(1), 2–7.Google Scholar
  15. Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis.International Economic Review, 21, 31–44.Google Scholar
  16. McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand.International Economic Review, 22, 333–349.Google Scholar
  17. Olson, D. H., & McCubbin, H. I. (1983).Families: What makes them work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Pitt, M. M., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1985). Health and nutrient consumption across and within farm households.Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 212–223.Google Scholar
  19. Rosenzweig, M. R. (1986). Program interventions, intrahousehold distribution and the welfare of individuals: Modeling household behavior.World Development, 14, 233–243.Google Scholar
  20. Rushton, J. P. (1980).Altruism, socialization, and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Schoeni, R. F. (1991).Another leak in the bucket? Public transfer income and private family support. Unpublished working paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  22. Senauer, B., Garcia, M., & Jacinto, E. (1988). Determinants of the intrahousehold allocation of food in the rural Philippines.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 170–180.Google Scholar
  23. Szinovacz, M. (1987). Family power. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.),Handbook of Marriage and the Family (pp. 651–693). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. Terrell, W. T. (1986). Child support expenditure estimates for child support guidelines. InEssentials of child support guidelines development: Economic issues and policy considerations, (pp. 65–100). Washington, DC: Women's Legal Defense Fund.Google Scholar
  25. Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach.Journal of Human Resources, 25, 635–664.Google Scholar
  26. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion and riskless choice: A referencedependent model.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.Google Scholar
  27. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1988).Who's helping out? Support networks among American families (Current Population Reports, Series P-70, No. 13). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, E. O. (1975).Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathleen D. Zick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family and Consumer StudiesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations