Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 373–382 | Cite as

Balancing regulation and affordability of housing

  • Carol B. Meeks
Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Housing regulation is a growing concern because affordability of housing has been declining and regulations which increase housing costs have been escalating. Many of the regulations which have been adopted fulfill goals of protection of health, safety, or welfare; preservation of the environment; or improved energy conservation. Little attention, however, has been paid to the effect of these regulations on affordability. This article reviews the role of government regulation on housing, and discusses the parameters of the affordability/regulatory issue.

Key words

affordability housing housing regulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, A. (1990). At the top of the heap: Research helps Georgia manage its trash.Research Reporter, 20(1), 17–19.Google Scholar
  2. Berendt, J. (1988).Home: Fannie Mae: Fifty years of opening doors for American home buyers. Washington, DC: Federal National Mortgage Association.Google Scholar
  3. Brannigan, V. M. (1983). Applying new laws to existing buildings: Retrospective fire safety codes.Journal of Urban Law, 60, 447–472.Google Scholar
  4. Brannigan, V. M. & Meeks, C. B. (1991). European unification, single markets, and product safety: The American experience with federal/state regulation of housing safety.Journal of Consumer Policy, 14, 63–86.Google Scholar
  5. Chaluvadi, A. (1991, August). Market share of top builders.Housing Economics, pp. 51–52.Google Scholar
  6. Cheit, R. (1990).Setting safety standards: Regulation in the public and private sectors. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. D'Alessandris, D. (1991, November). Lead paint abatement.Housing Economics, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
  8. Dacquisto, D., & Meyer, D. (1992, May 4). The 7–11 code change—A step backwards?Nation's Building News, pp. 4–5, 9.Google Scholar
  9. Downs, A. (1991). The advisory commission of regulatory barriers of affordable housing: Its behavior and accomplishments.Housing Policy Debate, 2, 1095–1137.Google Scholar
  10. Gramlich, E. (1990).A guide to benefit-cost analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Kean, T. (1991).“Not in my back yard” Removing barriers to affordable housing. Washington, DC: The Advisory Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing.Google Scholar
  12. Kuehn, R. H. (1988).The homebuilding industry: What will it take to produce more affordable housing? (HP#6). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Real Estate Development.Google Scholar
  13. Mage, D. T., & Gammage, R. B. (1985). Evaluation of changes in indoor air quality occurring over the past several decades. In R. B. Gammage & S. V. Kaye (Eds.),Indoor Air and Human Health (pp. 5–36). Chelsea, MI: Lewis.Google Scholar
  14. McFadden, J. R., & Brandt, J. A. (1990, October).Public policy. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association of Housing Educators, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
  15. Meeks, C. B. (1980).Housing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. National Association of Home Builders. (1992).The Future of Home Building. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  17. Ponessa, J. (1992).Environmental and safety issues in housing. Unpublished manuscript. NJ: Rutgers University Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
  18. Sanders, S. (1992, May 10). Talking trash.Athens Dailey News, pp. D1, D9.Google Scholar
  19. Seidel, S. R. (1978).Housing costs & government regulations: Confronting the regulatory maze. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.Google Scholar
  20. Stevens, J. (1991).Environmental impact issues of the '90s. Paper presented at the 1991 Annual Technical Conference for the Association of Home Equipment Educators. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
  21. Stum, M. S. (1992). Seeking solution to solid waste management: The role of lifestyles.The Journal of Consumer Education, 10, 22–26.Google Scholar
  22. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1991a).1990 Housing Highlights (CH-S-1-1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1991b).Characteristics of new housing: 1990 (Current Construction Reports Series C25-9013). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989).Comparing risks and setting environmental priorities (PM-220). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  25. Urban Land Institute. (1979).Reducing the development cost of housing: Actions for state and local governments. (Proceedings of the HUD National Conference on Housing Costs). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  26. White, W. (1978, May).Final report of the task force on housing costs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol B. Meeks
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Housing and Consumer EconomicsUniversity of GeorgiaAthens

Personalised recommendations