Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 355–372 | Cite as

Toward the turn of the century

  • Charles B. Hennon
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Families approaching the turn of the century are faced with a variety of economic forces that confront their very existence. This thematic issue of the Journal of Family and Economic Issues explores some of these critical factors and the types of adaptive strategies that families have or can incorporate. This article addresses how qualitative microanalysis, especially as informed through symbolic interaction theory, might help us better investigate, describe, analyze, understand, build theory about, and provide appropriate interventions for all families, especially those at risk. This article also highlights the contribution made by each author in this thematic issue.

Key words

cubistic family studies socially situated actions sustainable interaction symbolic interaction vocabularies of motive 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1957).Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H. S. (1986).Doing things together. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Couch, C. J. (1992). Toward a formal theory of social processes.Symbolic Interaction, 15, 117–134.Google Scholar
  4. Denzin, N. K. (1989a).Interpretative interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Denzin, N. K. (1989b).Interpretative biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Denzin, N. K. (1989c). Reading Tender Mercies: Two interpretations.The Sociological Quarterly, 30, 37–57.Google Scholar
  7. Deutscher, I. (1970). Beuchenwald, Mai Lai, and Charles Van Doren: Social psychology as explanation.The Sociological Quarterly, 11, 533–540.Google Scholar
  8. Deutscher, I. (1973).What we say/what we do: Sentiments & acts. Glenview, II: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  9. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1976–77). Family history and the life course.Journal of Family History, 2, 279–304.Google Scholar
  10. Gilgun, J. F., Daly, K., & Handel, G. (Eds.). (1992).Qualitative methods in family research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Godwin, D. D. (1991). Spouses' time allocation to household work: A review and a critique.Lifestyles: Family and Economic Issues, 12, 253–294.Google Scholar
  12. Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order.American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.Google Scholar
  13. Hayakawa, S. I. (1978).Language in thought and action (4th ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  14. Hennon, C. B. (1990). Quality of life: A discussion. In M. Carsky (Ed.),Proceedings: 36th Annual Conference of the American Council on Consumer Interest. Columbia, MO: ACCI.Google Scholar
  15. Hennon, C. B., & Arcus, M. (1993). Life-span family life education. In T. H. Brubaker (Ed.),Family relations: Challenges for the future (pp. 181–210). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Hennon, C. B., & Cole, C. L. (1981). Role strain and stress in split-shift relationships.Alternative Lifestyles: Changing Patterns in Marriage, Family and Intimacy, 4, 142–155.Google Scholar
  17. Joas, H. (1981). George Herbert Mead and the “division of labor”: Macrosociological implications of Mead's social psychology.Symbolic Interaction, 4, 177–190.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, J. M., & Altheide, D. L. (1991). Text without context and the problem of authority in ethnographic research.Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 12, 53–57.Google Scholar
  19. Kaplan, L., & Hennon, C. B. (1990).A social psychology of remarriage: A theoretical foundation for Personal Reflections (MUFCSC document #1-90). Oxford, OH: Miami University, Family and Child Studies Center.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan, L., & Hennon, C. B. (1992). Remarriage education: The Personal Reflections program.Family Relations, 41, 127–134.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplan, L., Hennon, C. B., & Ade-Ridder, L. (in press). Splitting custody of children between parents: Information for professionals concerning the impact on the sibling system.Families in Society.Google Scholar
  22. Katovich, M. A. (1987). Identity, time, and situated activity: An interactionist analysis of dyadic transactions.Symbolic Interaction, 10, 187–208.Google Scholar
  23. LaRossa, R. (1983). The transition to parenthood and the social reality of time.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 579–589.Google Scholar
  24. Maines, D. R. (1982). In search of mesostructure,Urban Life, 11, 267–279.Google Scholar
  25. Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive.American Sociological Review, 5, 904–913.Google Scholar
  26. Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (3rd ed.). (1979). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Owen, Alma J. (1991). Time and time again: implications of time perception theory.Lifestyles: Family and Economic Issues, 12, 345–359.Google Scholar
  28. Pestello, F. G., & Voydanoff, P. (1991). In search of mesostructure in the family: An interactionist approach to division of labor.Symbolic Interaction, 14, 105–128.Google Scholar
  29. Pestello, F. P. (1991). Discounting.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 20, 26–46.Google Scholar
  30. Sprey, J. (1979). Conflict theory and the study of marriage and the family. In W. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. Reiss (Eds.),Contemporary theories about the family: Vol. 2. General theories/theoretical orientations (pp. 130–159). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Stone, G. (1977). Personal acts.Symbolic Interaction, 1, 2–19.Google Scholar
  32. Straus, R. A. (1984). Changing the definition of the situation: Toward a theory of sociological intervention.Clinical Sociology Review, 2, 51–63.Google Scholar
  33. Strauss, A. (1978).Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Zurcher, L. (1979). Role selection: The influence of internalized vocabularies of motive.Symbolic Interaction, 2,(2), 45–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles B. Hennon
    • 1
  1. 1.Miami UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations