Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

, Volume 91, Issue 2, pp 490–513

The proton spin: The role of quark-gluonic and hadronic degrees of freedom

  • A. V. Kiselev
  • V. A. Petrov
Article

Abstract

The proton spin structure is analyzed theoretically in terms of both partonic and hadronic fields.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Leutwyler and J. Stern,Nucl. Phys. B,20, 77 (1970); R. Jackiw, R. Van Roegen, and G. B. West,Phys. Rev. D,2, 2473 (1970); R. A. Brandt and G. Preparata,Nucl. Phys. B,27, 541 (1971).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. J. G. Hey and J. E. Mandula,Phys. Rev. D,5, 2610 (1972); K. Sassaki,Prog. Theor. Phys.,54, 1816 (1975); M. A. Ahmed and G. G. Ross,Phys. Lett. B,56, 385 (1975).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Frishman,Phys. Rep. C,13, 1 (1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. L. Adler,Phys. Rev.,177, 2426 (1969); J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw,Nuovo Cimento A,51, 47 (1969).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. V. Kisselev and V. A. Petrov, “Spin crisis: Myths and reality,” Preprint 90-23 [in English], Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Kodaira,Nucl. Phys. B,165, 129 (1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. D. Bjorken,Phys. Rev.,148, 1467 (1966).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Bourquin et al.,Z. Phys. C,21, 27 (1983).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. J. Lipkin,Phys. Lett. B,214, 429 (1988).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Ashman et al.,Phys. Lett. B,206, 364 (1988);Nucl. Phys. B,328, 1 (1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Høgaasen and F. Myhrer,Z. Phys. C,48, 295 (1990).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. N. Bogolyubov and D. V. Shirkov,Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. I. Akhiezer and V. B. Berestetskii,Quantum Electrodynamics, Interscience, New York (1965).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. L. Jaffe and A. Manohar,Nucl. Phys. B,337, 509 (1990).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Baum et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,45, 2000 (1980).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. L. Jaffe,Phys. Lett. B,193, 101 (1987).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Ansel'mino, B. L. Ioffe, and É. Lider,Yad. Fiz.,49, 214 (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. D. Carlitz, J. C. Collins, and A. H. Mueller,Phys. Lett. B,214, 229 (1988).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Altarelli and G. G. Ross,Phys. Lett. B,212, 391 (1988).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Altarelli and W. J. Stirling,Part. W.,1, 40 (1989).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi,Nucl. Phys. B,126, 298 (1977).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. V. Efremov and O. V. Teryaev, “Spin structure of the nucleon and triangle anomaly,” Preprint E2-88-287 [in English], JINR, Dubna (1988).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. D. Carlitz, J. C. Collins, and A. H. Mueller, “The role of the axial anomaly in determining spin-dependent parton distributions,” in:Proc. XXIVth Rencontres de Moriond. Editions Frontiers (1989), pp. 623–637.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Forte,Phys. Lett. B,224, 189 (1989);Nucl. Phys. B,331, 1 (1990).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. T. Bodwin and J. Qiu,Phys. Rev. D,41, 2755 (1990).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Manohar, “Parton distributions from an operator viewpoint,” Preprint UCSD/PTH/90-14, University of California, San Diego (1990).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Altarelli and B. Lampe,Z. Phys. C,47, 315 (1990).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    L. Mankiewiez and A. Schäffer,Phys. Lett. B,242, 455 (1990).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    W. Vogelsang, “The gluonic contribution tog 1p(x, Q 2) in the parton model,” Preprint D0-TH 90/10, Dortmund University, Dortmund (1990).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. Cronsfröm and J. Mickelsson,J. Math. Phys.,24, 2528 (1983).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. E. Mandula,Phys. Rev. Lett.,65, 1403 (1990).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. S. Gorsky and B. L. Ioffe,Part. W.,1, 114 (1990).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. D. Dolgov and A. D. Zakharov,Nucl. Phys. B,27, 525 (1971).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    T. Hatsuda,Nucl. Phys. B,329, 376 (1990).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    T. P. Cheng and L. F. Li, “The proton “spin contents”: current status and perspectives,” Preprint CMU-HEP-90-2, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburg (1990).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    H. Fritzsch,Mod. Phys. Lett. A,5, 1815 (1990).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    X. Ji,Phys. Rev. Lett.,65, 408 (1990).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. H. Mueller,Phys. Lett. B,234, 517 (1990).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    H. Y. Cheng,Phys. Lett. B,219, 347 (1989).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    G. Veneziano,Mod. Phys. Lett. A,4, 1605 (1989).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    H. Fritzsch,Phys. Lett. B,242, 451 (1990).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    E. Guadagnini,Nucl. Phys. B,236, 35 (1984); P. O. Mazur, M. A. Nowak, and M. Praszalowicz,Phys. Lett. B,147, 137 (1984).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    S. J. Brodsky, J. Ellis, and M. Karliner,Phys. Lett. B,206, 309 (1988).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    N. W. Park, J. Schechter, and H. Weidel,Phys. Lett. B,228, 420 (1989).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Z. Ryzak,Phys. Lett. B,217, 325 (1989).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    T. D. Cohen and M. K. Banerjee,Phys. Lett. B,230, 129 (1989).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    C. Rosenzweig, J. Schechter, and G. Trahern,Phys. Rev. D,21, 3388 (1980); P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano,Nucl. Phys. B,171, 253 (1980); E. Witten,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),128, 363 (1980); P. Nath and R. Arnowitt,Phys. Rev. D,23, 473 (1981).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    G. M. Shore and G. Veneziano,Phys. Lett. B 244, 75 (1990).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    J. Schechter et al., “Effective Lagrangian for the two-component approach to the “proton spin” puzzle,” Preprint SU-4228-450, Syracuse University, Syracuse (1990).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    A. V. Kiselev and V. A. Petrov,Teor. Mat. Fiz.,88, 146 (1991).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    V. I. Ogievetskii and I. V. Polubarinov,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,45, 237 (1963).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    H. Kemmer,Helv. Phys. Acta,33, 829 (1960).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    V. I. Ogievetskii and I. V. Polubarinov,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,45, 966 (1963).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Particle Data Group, in:Phys. Lett. B,239, 1 (1990).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    E. Witten,Nucl. Phys. B,156, 269 (1979); G. Veneziano,Nucl. Phys. B,159, 213 (1979).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    R. V. Jackiw, in:Lectures on Current Algebra [Russian translations], Atomizdat, Moscow (1977).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    A. A. Ansel'm and A. A. Iogansen,Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz,49, 185 (1989).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    G. B. West,Nucl. Phys. B,288, 444 (1987).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    A. V. Kisselev and V. A. Petrov, “Singular structure of the parton distributions in semihard and soft processes,” in:Proc. XXIVth Recontres de Moriond. Editions Frontieres (1989), pp. 213–221.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    D. Coffman et al.,Phys. Rev. D.,38, 2695 (1988); J. Jousset et al.,Phys. Rev. D,41, 1389 (1990).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    J. Ellis, E. Gabathuler, and M. Karliner,Phys. Lett. B,217, 173 (1989).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    O. Dumbrajs et al.,Nucl. Phys. B,216 277 (1983).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    W. Grein and P. Knoll,Nucl. Phys. A,338, 332 (1980).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    V. A. Novikov et al.,Nucl. Phys. B,165, 55 (1980).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    F. J. Gilman and R. Kauffman,Phys. Rev. D,36, 2761 (1987).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    R. Akhoury and J. M. Frere,Phys. Lett. B,220, 258 (1989).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    K. T. Chao,Nucl. Phys. B,335, 101 (1990).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    N. N. Bogolyubov et al.,General Principles of Quantum Field Theory [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1987).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    G. Barton,Introduction to Dispersion Techniques in Field Theory, New York (1965).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Kiselev
  • V. A. Petrov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations