Skip to main content
Log in

Reasons for employee sabotage in the workplace

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unionized workers at a factory were asked to rate a variety of reasons which would justify the use of sabotage in an organization, as well as the justifiability of four general methods of sabotage (slowdowns, destructiveness, dishonesty, and causing chaos). Results showed that as compared to those who didn't accept a wide variety of reasons for sabotage, those who accepted a variety of reasons would more readily justify all forms of sabotage except dishonesty. The data is discussed in terms of the reasons for the lack of justification that dishonesty receives, as well as future directions for the study of sabotage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, V. L., & Greenberger, D. B. (1980). Destruction and perceived control. In A. Baum and J. E. Singer (Eds.),Advances in Environmental Psychology. (Vol. 2), Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, R. M. (1981). Self-presentational styles. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.),Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1979). The social learning perspective: Mechanisms of aggression. In H. Toch (Ed.) Psychology of crime and criminal justice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. & Kupers, C. (1964). Transmission of patterns of self-reinforcement through modeling.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1977).Human aggression. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1970). Experimental investigations of hostility catharsis.Journal of Clinical and Counseling Psychology, 35, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena.Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H. & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing the different kinds of hostility.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 522–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R. & Geis, F. (Eds.) (1970).Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. (1964).The approval motive. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1962). Studies in interpersonal bargaining.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6, 52–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, P. (1980).Sabotage in industry. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. K. (1984). Symbolic interactionism: A framework for the study of cultural mechanisms in organizations.Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Eastern Academy of Management, 21, 163–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B. (1978). Aggression as impression management.Social Psychology, 41, 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. (1969). Role-playing: Psychology by consensus.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978).The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934).Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R. (1982).People in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In B. Staw (Ed.),Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, Ct.: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980).Impression management. Monterey, Ca.: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (Ed.) (1985).The self and social life. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. R., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts.American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G. R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1983).The accountability of conduct: A social psychological analysis. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L., & Stucky, R. J. (1983).Excuses: Masquerades in search of grace. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 12). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terris, W. (1985).Employee theft: theory, research and applications. Park Ridge, IL: London House Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toch, H. (1969).Violent men. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillman, D. (1979).Hostility and aggression. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giacalone, R.A., Rosenfeld, P. Reasons for employee sabotage in the workplace. J Bus Psychol 1, 367–378 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01018145

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01018145

Keywords

Navigation