Skip to main content
Log in

The use of structured multi-domain job analysis for the construction of assessment center methods and procedures

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the defensibility of the assessment center based on a content oriented validation strategy. One reason for the confusion in this area is the fact that there are no agreed upon methods for constructing the assessment procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe how structured multi-domain job analysis information can be used to develop an assessment center which is well grounded with regard to content validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentz, V. J. (1963). Research toward the development of a multiple assessment program for executive personnel. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

  • Bray, D. W. (1964a). The assessment center method of appraising management potential. In Blood, J. W. (Ed.),The personnel job in a changing world. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D. W. (1964b). The management progress study.American Psychologist, 19, 419–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D. W. (1982). The assessment center and the study of lives.American Psychologist, 37, 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, D. H., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1980). Identifying managerial potential: An alternative to assessment centers.Personnel, 57, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byham, W. C. (1977). Application of the assessment center method. In J. L. Moses & W. C. Byham (Eds.),Applying the assessment center method. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byham, W. C., & Wettengel, C. (1974). Assessment centers for identifying and developing management potential in government operations.Public Personnel Management, 3, 352–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., & Weick, K. E. (1970).Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. M., Moses, J. L., & Byham, W. C. (1977). The validity of assessment centers-a literature review.Development dimensions inc.monograph II, Pittsburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, G. F., & Sackett, P. R. (1981). Some problems with applying content validity evidence to assessment center procedures.Academy of Management Review, 6, 551–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, R. B. (1976). Managerial assessment centers. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.),Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck, J. R., & Bray, D. W. (1976). Management assessment center evaluations and subsequent job performance of black and white females.Personnel Psychology, 29, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, H. (1961). Summary report of the early identification of management potential research in Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) and affiliated companies. SONJ, Social Science Research Division.

  • Laurent, H. (1962). The validation of aids for the identification of management potential. SONJ, Social Science Research Division.

  • Laurent, H. (1968). Research on the identification of management potential. In J. A. Myers (Ed.),Predicting managerial success. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Braun & Brumfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinney, A. C. (1967). The assessment of performance change: An inductive example.Organizational Behavior And Human Performance, 2, 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A., & MacKinnon, D. W. (1946). Assessment of OSS personnel.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 10, 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A., MacKinnon, D. W., Miller, J. G., Fiske, D. W., & Hanfmann, E. (1948).Assessment of men. New York: Rinehart & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, S. D. (1977). The empirical and content validity of assessment centers vs. traditional methods for predicting managerial success.Academy of Management Review, 2, 442–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, S. D. (1981). The assessment center process and content validity: A reply to Dreher and Sackett.Academy of Management Review, 6, 561–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prien, E. P., & Katz, D. (1985). A review of the In-basket test. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Prien, E. P., & Ronan, W. W. (1971). Job analysis: A review of research findings.Personnel Psychology, 24, 371–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Dreher, G. G. (1981). Some Misconceptions about content-oriented validation: A rejoinder to Norton.Academy of Management Review, 6, 567–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Dreher, G. F. (1982). Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. K. (1960). The unsolved riddle of executive success.Personnel, 37, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures (1978).Federal Register,43, No. 166, 38290–38315.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schippmann, J.S., Hughes, G.L. & Prien, E.P. The use of structured multi-domain job analysis for the construction of assessment center methods and procedures. J Bus Psychol 1, 353–366 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01018144

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01018144

Keywords

Navigation