Skip to main content
Log in

On the relationship betweenT 1 andT 2 for stochastic relaxation models

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the relaxation dynamics of two quantum levels coupled to a stochastic bath. We emphasize that even if the matrix elements of the fluctuating Hamiltonian are Gaussian, a second-order cumulant truncation is not exact. For various stochastic models, including the case of a spin-1/2 particle in a fluctuating magnetic field, we calculate 1/T 1, the population relaxation rate, and 1/T 2, the phase relaxation rate, up to fourth order in perturbation theory. We show that unlike the commonly accepted second-order result that 1/T 2⩾1/2T 1, when fourth-order terms are included, in some instances 1/T 2<1/2T 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Bloch,Phys. Rev. 70:460 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Abragam,The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Oxford, London, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. P. Slichter,Principles of Magnetic Resonance, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Wolf,Spin-Temperature and Nuclear-Spin Relaxation in Matter (Clarendon, Oxford, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Carrington and A. D. McLachlan,Introduction to Magnetic Resonance (Harper and Row, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. C. Farrar and E. D. Becker,Pulse and Fourier Transform NMR (Academic Press, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Bloembergen, E. M. Purcell, and R. V. Pound,Phys. Rev. 73:679 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. K. Wangsness and F. Bloch,Phys. Rev. 89:728 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Bloch,Phys. Rev. 102:104 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. G. Redfield,Adv. Mag. Res. 1:1 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. G. Gordon,Adv. Mag. Res. 3:1 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. M. Deutch and I. Oppenheim,Adv. Mag. Res. 3:43 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. F. Fox,J. Math. Phys. 17:1148 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. F. Fox,Phys. Rep. 48:179 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Kubo,Adv. Chem. Phys. 15:101 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Kubo,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 17:1100 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Kubo,J. Math. Phys. 4:174 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. H. Freed,J. Chem. Phys. 49:376 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Yoon, J. M. Deutch, and J. H. Freed,J. Chem. Phys. 62:4687 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Oppenheim, S. Mukamel, and J. Ross,Phys. Rev. A 17:1988 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Mukamel,Chem. Phys. 37:33 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. L. Skinner and D. Hsu,J. Phys. Chem. 90:4931 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Budimir, J., Skinner, J.L. On the relationship betweenT 1 andT 2 for stochastic relaxation models. J Stat Phys 49, 1029–1042 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017558

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017558

Key words

Navigation